• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Big Brother
CH5 Pathetic Blatant Bias
<<
<
4 of 5
>>
>
Bunions
25-08-2016
Originally Posted by Cat-:
“So if Bear wasn't there, what scenario do you propose as divisions and likely leaders? ”

Leaders:

Lewis
Aubrey
Renee
Saira
Biggins

Divisions:

Numerous, take your pick - there always are on BB and there always will be. It's human nature when you throw a bunch of disparate, desperate strangers together, lock the door and leave them to it.

The format was perfect. People will fall out and you just don't need any production meddling to make that happen.
Cat-
25-08-2016
Originally Posted by Bunions:
“Leaders:

Lewis
Aubrey
Renee
Saira
Biggins

Divisions:

Numerous, take your pick - there always are on BB and there always will be. It's human nature when you throw a bunch of disparate, desperate strangers together, lock the door and leave them to it.

The format was perfect. People will fall out and you just don't need any production meddling to make that happen.”

Why is Biggins there? So forget him.

As for the others, I don't find them intriguing.
MACTOWIN
25-08-2016
Now he has told us he is a BB Staff member I can understand the biased coverage.
appledash
25-08-2016
This whole series is a joke - even the live feed was the bear show the camera was on him like he was Tom cruise , every moment that a house mate spoke the chimpanzee couldn't help himself but take the camera away ,he's a ****ing clown and fingers crossed someone sticks one on him ,the ****
Cat-
25-08-2016
Originally Posted by MACTOWIN:
“Now he has told us he is a BB Staff member I can understand the biased coverage.”

Care to back it up?
Bunions
25-08-2016
Originally Posted by Cat-:
“Why is Biggins there? So forget him.

As for the others, I don't find them intriguing.”

You asked a question - I answered.

We're not going to see eye-to-eye on this because I think Bear is toxic and ruined the show for participants and viewers and you don't.

You can't understand why I feel that way and I can't understand why you don't.

Nuff said.
Reality Sucks
25-08-2016
Originally Posted by Cat-:
“This is what I mean as an example. You say that Aubrey is challenged by an overgrown toddler. I witnessed an overgrown spoilt brat in Aubrey.

Aubrey was brought out by Bear. As was Renee. They both are horrible females. No warmth and totally ruthless.”

That's how I see Bear - there's so much malice behind his "harmless pranks" . It's all about him and getting his mug in front of the camera all the time and he doesn't care who he tramples over to get his limelight.
MACTOWIN
25-08-2016
Originally Posted by Cat-:
“Care to back it up?”

I am sorry but this the BB Forum not The Crown Court Forum.
Cat-
26-08-2016
Originally Posted by Reality Sucks:
“That's how I see Bear - there's so much malice behind his "harmless pranks" . It's all about him and getting his mug in front of the camera all the time and he doesn't care who he tramples over to get his limelight.”

Why haven't you commented on Aubrey or Renee when it comes equally to malice and disruptive behaviour
smoggieboon
26-08-2016
Originally Posted by Lee_Bo:
“Roll on the next series where all the roles are the same but it's a new set of faces with people prepared to behave even worse than this time around.

I just hope they cut down on the innocent bystanders who are simply put in to be cannon fodder. Make them all assholes and let them tear each other and the house apart.

RIP BB”

To be honest, I think that this year's antics will scare off any interesting celebrities, and we'll get even more "Made in Chelsea/Essex/Geordieland" reality nonentities for the next series.
lon_chaney
26-08-2016
Originally Posted by Lee_Bo:
“He literally ruined the experience for everyone, most of the viewing public included.”

Nonsense.
Just because you have a bee in your bonnet dosnt mean everyone feels the same way.
Most people dont take it that seriously and just watch it as an irreverant laugh.
The ratings are good for this series.
Bunions
26-08-2016
Originally Posted by Cat-:
“Why haven't you commented on Aubrey or Renee when it comes equally to malice and disruptive behaviour”

What others do in there is ALWAYS in response to him and his bullshit.

They don't start the crap - he's the instigator every single time.

It's called retaliation and I just don't believe that the people who defend him, would themselves put up with someone like that idiot needling them constantly, wouldn't react.
Cranberryapple
26-08-2016
The Bear Bias has been as subtle as a brick.

Tonight's highlights was so bias it was actually embarrassing.

Something ( not cake gate ) kicked off between him and Renee as he told Marnie he was going to say sorry to her. But what did we get shown?! Well it wasn't whatever went on between them, rather, it was the complete opposite. It was an apologetic Bear making up, making breakfast, saying he wanted to just have fun, trying to talk to Renee and generally looking like the good guy.

But not a hint of what actually went on to know why Renee was behaving the way she was.

If that's not bias. I really don't know what is.🙄


Edit......Then again, it's no surprise. We had to wait until Sam came out to find out about the eye incident. Not a Murmur about that either.
starry
26-08-2016
There was bias on the official website even back in the CH4 days, it's been a mugs game voting on this for years.
Darcyprincess
26-08-2016
Originally Posted by Cat-:
“I don't know what to say other than I'm flabbergasted that a lot of fms that said they'd never take this show seriously, suddenly are taking this show seriously, and getting really wound up. I'm amazed actually.........truly absolutely astoundingly out of my mind out of it..........can't believe it. Well I rest my case ”

I'm not wound up Cat, but I'm more flabbergasted that you have not watched live feed but think you know Bear so well! As for taking the show serious, are you joking, it's become a massive joke! After having somebody like Bear on the show, especially if he does win it will never be taken seriously again by any real Celebrities! The show is dead!
Darcyprincess
26-08-2016
Originally Posted by MACTOWIN:
“Now he has told us he is a BB Staff member I can understand the biased coverage.”

That didn't shock anybody did i? I think he was actually telling the truth for once!
LHolmes
26-08-2016
Originally Posted by MARI XX:
“More usually lurking *waves. I watched live feed last night. Bear had a major petulant strop about not getting the most entertaining housemate. He was particularly aggravated with Ricky. What was shown on HL a bit of light-hearted fun, stealing the sash. BB keep on telling HM to sit down an keep quiet. To assist the faux calm of the highlights?”

I saw it too. He really felt like he was entitled to get 'most entertaining'. Most oafish more like. All he has done is upset people. He might be having fun and think his behaviour qualifies as 'entertaining', ditto those on his team, but it's not entertaining to those he is constantly trying to get a rise out of. He can't grasp this.

Also in the DR highlights before last, he said the others haven't shown enough sides... maybe they would've if he hadn't stifled them. And beyond being a tosser what sides has he shown of himself?
keep_it_real1
26-08-2016
lmao@ the embarrassingly over dramatized sourgrapes
ahoyy
26-08-2016
That's because Bear is the only one that has done anything all series. They have more footage to pick from because all the other housemates were dullards. Other housemates only came to anyone's notice by creating an argument with Bear. He made them relevant for five minutes by allowing them to argue with him on occasion.
keep_it_real1
26-08-2016
Originally Posted by ahoyy:
“That's because Bear is the only one that has done anything all series. They have more footage to pick from because all the other housemates were dullards. Other housemates only came to anyone's notice by creating an argument with Bear. He made them relevant for five minutes by allowing them to argue with him on occasion.”

Spot on the money! enough said......
Scarlet O'Hara
26-08-2016
Originally Posted by Bunions:
“What others do in there is ALWAYS in response to him and his bullshit.

They don't start the crap - he's the instigator every single time.

It's called retaliation and I just don't believe that the people who defend him, would themselves put up with someone like that idiot needling them constantly, wouldn't react.”

Exactly. It's annoying to read people say the other HMs aren't interesting or haven't done anything, when they've had an energy vampire in there hogging all the focus and deliberately needling them. Of course thats going to affect how they respond as individuals AND how they bond as a group. It's social psychology 101.

I can guess a few interesting dynamics we might have seen play out without Bear...Renee as house alpha, for example. Would her and Aubrey have bonded had they not been rallying against Bear? Ditto Renee and Sam? Could we have seen an interesting rivalry or power struggle? A house backlash against Renee, whose vulnerable side we might not have seen?

And Katie's neuroticism...how much of that could have played out if he hadn't pulled all the attention his way?

And Sam's ego? Or Lewis's narcissism? Or Heavy D not being a one note weirdo who copied Bear? Or Frankie's entertainment and possible game playing? Or Saira's obnoxiousness?

We've seen glimpses of all this but nothing more. Cos the entire social dynamic AND the show's focus has been largely, Bear. He can't even let us have an eviction without acting up for the cameras and that absolutely IS always interesting.
Ms Ann Thrope
26-08-2016
Originally Posted by ahoyy:
“That's because Bear is the only one that has done anything all series. They have more footage to pick from because all the other housemates were dullards. Other housemates only came to anyone's notice by creating an argument with Bear. He made them relevant for five minutes by allowing them to argue with him on occasion.”

Utter rubbish, he stifled the rest of them into a kind of hostage situation and killed the series with his stupid shenanigans.

He made the other housemate dull and that's the bottom line. I pretty much gave up on it when I saw which way the wind was blowing, it was just another Helen Wood situation, and I couldn't stand watching her either.
Bunions
26-08-2016
Originally Posted by ahoyy:
“That's because Bear is the only one that has done anything all series. They have more footage to pick from because all the other housemates were dullards. Other housemates only came to anyone's notice by creating an argument with Bear. He made them relevant for five minutes by allowing them to argue with him on occasion.”

Bear, Marnie and Heavy D were by FAR the biggest dullards in that house.

I think you need to use a different word, or perhaps learn the actual meaning of this this one?
Bunions
26-08-2016
Originally Posted by keep_it_real1:
“lmao@ the embarrassingly over dramatized sourgrapes ”

What is over dramatised about all the VTs on the website being about Bear?

How can stating a fact be overly dramatic?

I don't understand, can you explain?
Hoffmister
26-08-2016
I think those that vote to save Bear should be made to live with him for a month

Nah ... its not worth any of our pennies, the producers can be as bias as they like, they all ways have been but it normally dosent work and when it does like with Helen, they end up banning the person from their after shows as they are too... well.

Its just sad that BB has descended into this booze addled mess over the fun tasks they used to do on c4. C5 must of loved it when Bear created his own tasks, saves them spending any money.
<<
<
4 of 5
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map