DS Forums

 
 

How to make NewWho as good as Classic?


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 31-08-2016, 11:39
Nelson_De_Souza
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 413
I do have a soft spot for Matt's Doctor. When he was allowed to be funny, I think he was very funny. I actually think Matt's comedic skills were the best of all the Doctor's so far. And on reflection I think my phrasing was perhaps a little harsh. I guess I found the 11th Doctor less accessible, emotionally, than 9 and 10. But part of that was due to the fact that he had two companions on the trot (Amy and then Clara) who weren't created to be ordinary people but characters with an extraordinary tale of their own. And I think it works best when when there is an ordinary person (somelike like us) on board the TARDIS to draw out those more human interactions with the Doctor.

I do agree with your concerns about 12, however, and I do think this could continue to have a negative impact on the show. I guess we will find out in the Spring!
It's horses for courses, isn't it I suppose? Matt's Doctor may have been less accessible to some, but I found Amy the most captivating companion there's been and that worked wonderfully with Matt IMO. Her backstory enhanced the character (I found it relatable) and when Rory joined the party full-time, its the most enjoyment I've had from the show ever.

I agree Clara's way of coming into the show wasn't as good and never took to her, although part of that comes down to Jenna in my opinion not being as good an actress as other companions. That's all opinion though.

I do worry for the show at the moment though if its going down a more Classic Who route, its closing itself off more and more to people. Hopefully the next Doctor (which I hope comes with Chibnall) will be the breath of fresh air needed. They need to be fun and accessible....
Nelson_De_Souza is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 31-08-2016, 11:55
Mulett
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Essex
Posts: 8,406
I do worry for the show at the moment though if its going down a more Classic Who route, its closing itself off more and more to people. Hopefully the next Doctor (which I hope comes with Chibnall) will be the breath of fresh air needed. They need to be fun and accessible....
Peter Capaldi is one of my favourite actors and, by all accounts, is a lovely bloke too. But I just don't think his incarnation has worked.

I was SO upset when Clara stayed on at the end of "Last Christmas" and her continued presence (in my opinion) damaged season 9. I think the same for the 12th Doctor. I think the launch of the Chibnall era will stumble at the first step without a new Doctor.
Mulett is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31-08-2016, 12:00
Nelson_De_Souza
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 413
Peter Capaldi is one of my favourite actors and, by all accounts, is a lovely bloke too. But I just don't think his incarnation has worked.

I was SO upset when Clara stayed on at the end of "Last Christmas" and her continued presence (in my opinion) damaged season 9. I think the same for the 12th Doctor. I think the launch of the Chibnall era will stumble at the first step without a new Doctor.
Indeed. It's all fine and good being lovely off-screen but judging on what we seen on screen, I honestly don't get why anyone would want to travel with Peter's Doctor. I honestly don't get that.

I remember groaning too when I saw 'the Doctor AND Clara will return' for Series 9 thing too. It definitiely didn't help that series at all. There was nothing new to it. It's no surprise the promotional material came upon a stumbling block "same old, same old" or something on those lines, wasn't it?
Nelson_De_Souza is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 31-08-2016, 12:38
Lord Smexy
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 1,506
Romance for me is the weakest kind of storytelling and is so often done because of its basic nature. Every time there is a man and a woman there is always the need for them to have something more. It's weak storytelling as it usually stops the characters growing and they enter a rut. It is much more difficult and rewarding to not follow the status quo.
Basically this. It always gets to the point where the male and female lead inevitably fall in love and I can't help but groan at how cheap it is and wonder why I'm supposed to care. Many stories are prone to tack it on the end without actually bothering to build that chemistry up. I know it's something we can relate to, but by this point it's become so tedious it's more akin to eating cornflakes... I can relate to that to, but I don't want it shoehorned into everything I watch.

Why not have more same-sex relationships? They're still a relatively new thing in the scope of it all that the industry still tiptoes around, but I also think there's a much wider potential for ideas in it. The ones we do see tend to be more layered and compelling because there's the added drama of social rejection, self-esteem, etc. which tends to make the characters feel ever so closer and unbreakable together.
Lord Smexy is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 31-08-2016, 12:42
Lord Smexy
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 1,506
Think you're somewhat overstating things there. It's not every time, you know that. Over-egging it like that hardly helps your argument.

You say its weak storytelling and its basic, but isn't that why people like to watch things grow like that? If its basic, its relatable therefore easier to connect with characters. I am not for one moment saying every character needs relationships, but they are there to reflect life's true aspects, one of which is love and relationships. Quite a lot of people are in them, so shouldn't that be reflected?

In Doctor Who, its hardly ever got that much in the way of the show has it? The only one I can think where it was overdone was Clara and Danny in the Caretaker. That was overdone, but elsewhere its all slotted in perfectly and enhanced the story.
Series 2. Easily one of my worst series of Who, possibly behind only Season 24, and the ending was the nail in the coffin for me. It represents almost everything I dislike about these repetitive love stories.
Lord Smexy is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 31-08-2016, 13:48
TroubleMaker
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 58
Why not have more same-sex relationships?
As the OP, I don't remember any same-sex relationships in Classic Doctor Who.

I'd rather not see smooching in Doctor Who, whether heterosexual or LGBTQABCDEFG.

We only got a flaming Captain Jack because RTD believes in using his show running opportunities as a political and campaign tool when it comes to alternative sexualities.

Classic Who was always neutral in this regard. Was never used to ram a minority viewpoint down the mainstream's throat - unless you count appreciation of cult/scifi tv.

A recurring answer in this thread is bringing back cliffhanger episodes. Yes. Definitely.

Also, New Who episodes seems much more smug and all wrapped up in a pretty little bow at the end. Strikes me as having similarities to The Simpsons after about Season 12 when Homer became self-aware of his stupidity and played up to it.

Also missing from New Who: Quarries. Need more episodes set in a quarry, whether used a a quarry or as an alien landscape. That and a 6 episode story arc that involves the Doctor repeatedly running back and forth across a quarry from on side of battle to the other.
TroubleMaker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31-08-2016, 14:44
Mulett
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Essex
Posts: 8,406
As the OP, I don't remember any same-sex relationships in Classic Doctor Who.
I know! It's almost like society has changed in the past 27 years. Who'd have thought?
Mulett is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31-08-2016, 17:48
TroubleMaker
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 58
I know! It's almost like society has changed in the past 27 years. Who'd have thought?
Sexual relationship with a paving slab. Real family viewing....
TroubleMaker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31-08-2016, 18:33
Mulett
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Essex
Posts: 8,406
Sexual relationship with a paving slab. Real family viewing....
I'm currently watching Doctor Who from episode one (2005) with my 14 year old. She's really enjoying it too. We're halfway through season 2 and Love and Monsters is the next one we're watching. It'll be interesting to see what she thinks of those final scenes.
Mulett is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31-08-2016, 19:01
Lord Smexy
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 1,506
As the OP, I don't remember any same-sex relationships in Classic Doctor Who.

I'd rather not see smooching in Doctor Who, whether heterosexual or LGBTQABCDEFG.

We only got a flaming Captain Jack because RTD believes in using his show running opportunities as a political and campaign tool when it comes to alternative sexualities.

Classic Who was always neutral in this regard. Was never used to ram a minority viewpoint down the mainstream's throat - unless you count appreciation of cult/scifi tv.
It's not "political" when it comes to heterosexual relationships, I don't see why it's any different with same-sex ones.

My fault for bringing it up though, I didn't realise that in 2016 same-sex relationships were still vexing for some.
Lord Smexy is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 31-08-2016, 19:23
dave_windows
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 5,365
What are the elements you think would be needed to make the new episodes as good as the Classics?
Stop putting everything on modern day earth or spacestations.

Give us alien planets.
dave_windows is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31-08-2016, 19:27
Nakatomi
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: The North!
Posts: 2,201
Stop putting everything on modern day earth or spacestations.

Give us alien planets.
Some of the best classic Who episodes were Earthbound! Having said that, I'd love to see more alien planets or historical settings. I thought Moffat captured it pretty well with some of the episodes, in particular the opener of the last series which had quite a few planets. I still hold out hope for something like the Shadow Proclamation returning, it gave the show a big sense of scale.
Nakatomi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31-08-2016, 23:14
Brandon_Smith
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 2,295
My two penneth.

I think casting the Doctor as a romantic lead at the beginning of New Who in 2005 was a great idea and a key reason the show became the hit it did, here and around the world. I think Christopher and David both filled that role brilliantly and delivered incarnations that took the audience on a heady, passionate adventure for five years.

And I guess that's my point. I don't see the romance element necessarily as a 'will they/won't they' situation between the Doctor and his companion (it certainly wasn't that way with Donna).

For me it's more about how the Doctor interacts with the audience. I think that, with David in particular, a whole section of the viewing public fell head of heels in love with his Doctor and actually still is.

For me Matt's Doctor was more eccentric and emotionally closed, much more like a Classic Doctor, and Peter's Doctor even more so. The 12th incarnation feels much more like a Classic Doctor to me. I find a very strong similarity between Peter's Doctor and Tom Baker's Doctor, even down to how they sound.

But my personal feeling is that a Classic style Doctor just isn't hit the mark with a modern TV audience. And I don't feel popularity and quality are mutually exclusive. The show has hit the mark with both since in first came back in 2005. I just don't see anything that makes me feel the quality of the show has increased, only that its popularity is reducing.
I strongly agree with you I remember loving the time The Doctor and Rose spent together and thought the I love you in doomsday was a result of their character progression and the result of how far their friendship came but I also loved The Doctor and Donna as just friends I think RTD made the right choice introducing this element and making it more like a "soap" with the companions problems at home but it didn't overshadow the episode,
Brandon_Smith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2016, 07:46
Sam_Gee1
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 697
Some of the best classic Who episodes were Earthbound! Having said that, I'd love to see more alien planets or historical settings. I thought Moffat captured it pretty well with some of the episodes, in particular the opener of the last series which had quite a few planets. I still hold out hope for something like the Shadow Proclamation returning, it gave the show a big sense of scale.
Apart from the 3rd Doctor era very few stories were modern earth.

The War Machines, Faceless ones, The Web of Fear, The Invasion, Robot, Terror of the Zygons, The Android Invasion, Seeds of Doom, Hand of Fear, Image of the Fendahl, City of Death, Black Orchid, The Awakening, Ressurection of the Daleks, Mark of the Rani, The Two Doctors and Ghost Light.

That is not many at all, and what made these stories better is since modern day earth was rarely used it feels unique, and the fact that every one of those stories happens in completely different environments and settings. We aren't constricted in London and Cardiff.
Sam_Gee1 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2016, 12:34
Corwin
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 12,601
Apart from the 3rd Doctor era very few stories were modern earth.

The War Machines, Faceless ones, The Web of Fear, The Invasion, Robot, Terror of the Zygons, The Android Invasion, Seeds of Doom, Hand of Fear, Image of the Fendahl, City of Death, Black Orchid, The Awakening, Ressurection of the Daleks, Mark of the Rani, The Two Doctors and Ghost Light.
I wouldn't count Black Orchid (1920's) and Mark of the Rani (19th Century) as modern Earth.

Survival is partly (mostly?) set on Modern Earth, at least half of Logopolis is and Battlefield though set a few years in the future would probably count as well (given that all the Pertwee earth stories were probably a few years in the future).
Corwin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2016, 12:47
Sam_Gee1
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 697
I wouldn't count Black Orchid (1920's) and Mark of the Rani (19th Century) as modern Earth.

Survival is partly (mostly?) set on Modern Earth, at least half of Logopolis is and Battlefield though set a few years in the future would probably count as well (given that all the Pertwee earth stories were probably a few years in the future).
Ah yes, i couldn't really remember if Black Orchid was modern day or not. Survival was a tough one, as at least half the episode was on that cheetah planet, and i felt the story was more to do with that, than the Earth setting.

I have no idea why i put Mark as modern, the mind slips. Logopolis probably could be modern Earth as well, but i left it out similarly to Survival as i wouldn't call it an Earth story, it just happened to revolve around there from time to time.

Forgot completely about Battlefield, that can join the list.
Sam_Gee1 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2016, 18:23
daveyboy7472
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Peri's Cleavage
Posts: 14,690
Apart from the 3rd Doctor era very few stories were modern earth.

The War Machines, Faceless ones, The Web of Fear, The Invasion, Robot, Terror of the Zygons, The Android Invasion, Seeds of Doom, Hand of Fear, Image of the Fendahl, City of Death, Black Orchid, The Awakening, Ressurection of the Daleks, Mark of the Rani, The Two Doctors and Ghost Light.

That is not many at all, and what made these stories better is since modern day earth was rarely used it feels unique, and the fact that every one of those stories happens in completely different environments and settings. We aren't constricted in London and Cardiff.
How about Planet Of Giants? The Stones Of Blood?Mawdryn Undead? Time Flight-(to a certain degree?) Arc Of Infinity?

Plus the very first episode(If one counts it as a separate story, which in some ways it is)



daveyboy7472 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2016, 20:55
Hestia
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 272
How about Planet Of Giants? The Stones Of Blood?Mawdryn Undead? Time Flight-(to a certain degree?) Arc Of Infinity?

Plus the very first episode(If one counts it as a separate story, which in some ways it is)



Silver Nemesis?
Hestia is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2016, 21:54
Sam_Gee1
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 697
How about Planet Of Giants? The Stones Of Blood?Mawdryn Undead? Time Flight-(to a certain degree?) Arc Of Infinity?

Plus the very first episode(If one counts it as a separate story, which in some ways it is)



Ah yes the first 3 and Silver Nemeais. Well actually I debate planet of the Giants mainly because they are so small it's like a new world. Time flight and infinity aren't earth stories, they just happen to be there for a period of time.
Sam_Gee1 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2016, 13:14
johnnysaucepn
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 6,651
Classic Who was always neutral in this regard. Was never used to ram a minority viewpoint down the mainstream's throat - unless you count appreciation of cult/scifi tv.
What you think of as neutral is probably better classified as ramming a mainstream viewpoint down everybody's throats. Casual sexism to racial stereotyping and everything in-between.

Even aside from that, some of the most respected episodes - and, in fact, aspects of the Doctor's character as a whole - were about the right of the individual over that of the mainstream. From environmental campaigners, to faceless military, to the control of the media in suppressing individual thought. It seems odd to just focus on the kissing.
johnnysaucepn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2016, 13:34
Conall Cearnach
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 831
How about Planet Of Giants? The Stones Of Blood?Mawdryn Undead? Time Flight-(to a certain degree?) Arc Of Infinity?

Plus the very first episode(If one counts it as a separate story, which in some ways it is)



Don't be daft, the first episode was set in the early sixties.
Conall Cearnach is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2016, 14:08
Sam_Gee1
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 697
33 out of 155 classic who episodes were set on modern day Earth.
New Who 44 out of 107 episodes modern day Earth.

Simply Earth stories in general any era. I need to add a criteria, if more than half the story is on Earth, or an significant portion then i will count it.

Classic Who- 63 out of 155 set on Earth. May have missed a couple.

New Who- 85 out of 107 episodes on Earth, 80% of episodes!

What i want is definitely more alien planets, the stats speak for themselves.
Sam_Gee1 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2016, 16:57
TroubleMaker
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 58
33 out of 155 classic who episodes were set on modern day Earth.
New Who 44 out of 107 episodes modern day Earth.

Simply Earth stories in general any era. I need to add a criteria, if more than half the story is on Earth, or an significant portion then i will count it.

Classic Who- 63 out of 155 set on Earth. May have missed a couple.

New Who- 85 out of 107 episodes on Earth, 80% of episodes!

What i want is definitely more alien planets, the stats speak for themselves.
Which brings us back to the quarry...
TroubleMaker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2016, 17:43
daveyboy7472
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Peri's Cleavage
Posts: 14,690
Ah yes the first 3 and Silver Nemeais. Well actually I debate planet of the Giants mainly because they are so small it's like a new world. Time flight and infinity aren't earth stories, they just happen to be there for a period of time.
I would say Planet Of Giants counts as it still had modern settings and the non regular, normal sized people were quite contemporary. Time Flight was always questionable but Arc Of Infinity had a large amount of location stuff in each episode and Part 4 was nearly all location so I would say it counts.

Don't be daft, the first episode was set in the early sixties.
Does that mean Mawdryn Undead wasn't modern as it was set in 1983?
daveyboy7472 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply




 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 00:04.