Originally Posted by
Vicky8675309:
“I understand and it seems like Bear is the "bitch eating crackers" which is a colloquialism that essentially means--you can't stand someone so much that just their breathing annoys you
I had a different perception of him and would not want to live with him like that IRL. However I found it interesting watching other HMs deal with him and with each other. I don't think they could have carried the show without him and Renee....well, they could have but then BB would have had to step in and create conflict via their tasks. I prefer HMs who can generate their own conflict without getting personal. I think Aubrey and Renee got too personal as did Katie and Boom however I think they tried to avoid getting personal and then snapped. I think they regretted getting personal yet I don't think they would admit to it. Just my opinion... I also don't think Bear is an angel yet he isn't mean imo. Annoying? yes, at times
”
Thanks for the explanation, that's a new phrase to me!
Yeah, that's probably one of the issues at the crux of it. I didn't feel like any one person should be 'a task' to be endured. All HMs should be on a equal footing and playing together against BB. TBH the whole game is so corrupted now (with showing them tweets etc) anyway.
I also didn't like the focus on him to the exclusion of others. I think there would have been some juicy stuff if things had been allowed to evolve naturally.
It just felt like lazy producing, letting one antagonistic HM do all the heavy lifting when it's their job to come up with tasks etc. not just stick someone in there to wind everyone up.
We both have a positive out of it though, you got your winner and for me the headache is over