Originally Posted by Aimee:
“That's the problem with trying to win by being 'entertaining' we don't get to see, or like, the real person. {Although i think we saw the NASTY side of him very clearly.]
He certainly did not win because he was popular. The thrust of the arguments in support of him winning were all 'he's been the most entertaining' 'he's been the show' NOT "he's such a nice guy'.
He did NOTHING to make anyone actually like him and, if that was his goal, it was a big, BIG fail.
Side note- Personally I still think Frankie was the best of both worlds, entertaining, funny AND kind. he should have won, but his fan base live in another country and BB stuffed all the other HMs in the edits.”
“That's the problem with trying to win by being 'entertaining' we don't get to see, or like, the real person. {Although i think we saw the NASTY side of him very clearly.]
He certainly did not win because he was popular. The thrust of the arguments in support of him winning were all 'he's been the most entertaining' 'he's been the show' NOT "he's such a nice guy'.
He did NOTHING to make anyone actually like him and, if that was his goal, it was a big, BIG fail.
Side note- Personally I still think Frankie was the best of both worlds, entertaining, funny AND kind. he should have won, but his fan base live in another country and BB stuffed all the other HMs in the edits.”
There was a moment with Stephen and Marnie in the garden where she said something like 'they wanna sing and dance and be all pally and I just want to get drunk and put on a good tv show' (it was something like that, if not exactly that)
It showed a big difference in how the reality people thought and what BB was to them.
What they think is entertaining is tiresome and boring to me, I and I think a lot of long term BB fans, are more interested in the relationships and the natural conflicts that arise not forced ones.



