Originally Posted by lou_123:
“Whilst I see your point, it is also worth noting it was all well over a decade ago, and things can change a lot in 10+ years. Whilst homophobia is still sadly present, it isn't as bad as it was back then. In other words, it would be much more likely for the character of Vera to refuse going to the bingo hall back then, than it would now.”
I tend to agree with you, though I don't think homophobia was any less prevalent than it is today, it's just less acceptable. The people who had homophobic views 10 years ago still have them today, their opinions won't have changed it's just that they're less socially acceptable. Les's 'dressing down' in that scene demonstrated how society more widely (i.e. the rest of the pub) was moving away from Les's outdated viewpoint. Les, however, will still hold those views today, he would be less likely to air them in public (if he was a real person, that is).
As a viewer I want to see a variety of views and opinions aired, I want to see rich characters who are full of flaws. I am not interested in characters being neatly positioned into 'good' and 'bad' categories. I want to see characters that challenge perceptions and have their own perceptions challenged (like Les in that scene). No way am I suggesting that Les Battersby is a 'rich' character, but compare him to some of today's cast and he's practically Shakespearean. All soaps these days plum for the basic option, which is goodies vs baddies. There's very little light or shade. In the era in question you had the likes of Gail, Vera and Blanche ('It'll be full of ho-mo-sexuals'/'I'm not having any fella who wears women's underwear anywhere near my flesh and blood') all making highly homophobic and transphobic comments, but it didn't make them a wholly bad character, it was just one flaw of a much more complex identity. Today you'd get none of that, you just get simplistic characters demonstrating simplistic viewpoints.
Society has moved forward but Coronation Street has moved backwards.