DS Forums

 
 

Why aren't more atheists committing crimes?


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 29-08-2016, 12:43
bollywood
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 35,216
Then you have not read what Blair gave as her reasons. Religion; or lack of it should not be a factor in sentancing at all.
Try to be honest here; would you be defending this if a persons atheism was given as a reason to reduce a punishment?
Well I did and I thought we had this discussion in the past as well.

I can't say it was not only religion that was her reason but that would be unusual.

What I said was judges don't always tell you what they know or is said in chambers.
bollywood is online now   Reply With Quote
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 29-08-2016, 12:44
UIR
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,048
No one is saying bad people aren't religious. They can be religious or not religious.

But having more religious in prison correlates with race and poverty, that you are overlooking.

You don't see a higher proportion of Black Protestant lawyers and doctors in prison, for example. Or white college professors. So it's not being Protestant that correlates with staying out of prison, it's wealth and education.

And Catholics have a smaller representation in prison.
Start a thread about race and prisons then.
UIR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-08-2016, 12:45
be more pacific
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 16,034
Opinion.

The facts are, most people in US and UK prisons are religious.

See, religious folk tend to have a hard time accepting bad people are religious to and try to dismiss it or claim they're not really religious. This of course doesn't wash.

The best current example is the denial of Isis terrorists being muslims.
Indeed. There's a New Agey attitude that anything religious or 'spiritual' - whatever the f*** that means - is inherently benign. All the nasty stuff is dismissed as an extremist fringe or somehow not real religion.

Using that cretinous reasoning, Saudi Arabia isn't really a religious country. In which case, it's a bit of a mystery why they base all their barbaric laws on a religious text?
be more pacific is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-08-2016, 12:45
fastzombie
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 5,464
Then you have not read what Blair gave as her reasons. Religion; or lack of it should not be a factor in sentancing at all.
Try to be honest here; would you be defending this if a persons atheism was given as a reason to reduce a punishment?
Do you not think this is another example of PC gone mad? You're religion or lack of should not be a deciding factor when you've knowingly broken the law, end of.
fastzombie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-08-2016, 12:46
bollywood
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 35,216
Start a thread about race and prisons then.
I don't need to.

I only need to point out that if you pick one thing and say that's a correlation, it may not be the significant one.

That's been the downfall of many medical studies, too, mistaking correlation for causation.
bollywood is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 29-08-2016, 12:47
UIR
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,048
The fact is most people in prison claim they're innocent.

What they claim and what they are is another matter.

You seem to be trying extra hard to essentially criminalise the religious for your own purposes. That seems to be increasingly common among online atheists this marginalisation of anyone not atheist. It's like atheism's gone from being a philosophical concept with a long history and heritage of thinkers, to a pub brawl hate group.
We have a legal system to determine whether or not someone is guilty. I'm not sure what your point is here... do you?

And I haven't tried at all, I googled religion in prisons. That was all the effort it took to dismiss claims by believers that prisoners are not religious.

The numbers of people in prison are also a fraction of those not in prison, so how exactly am I essentially criminalising the religious for my own purposes? Could you try and make more sense?
UIR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-08-2016, 12:48
bollywood
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 35,216
We have a legal system to determine whether or not someone is guilty. I'm not sure what your point is here... do you?

And I haven't tried at all, I googled religion in prisons. That was all the effort it took to dismiss claims by believers that prisoners are not religious.

The numbers of people in prison are also a fraction of those not in prison, so how exactly am I essentially criminalising the religious for my own purposes? Could you try and make more sense?
You could also say that the vast majority of black Protestants do not end up in prison.

See it depends how you look at statistics.

Maybe religion has helped many to deal with poverty and alienation.
bollywood is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 29-08-2016, 12:50
UIR
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,048
I don't need to.

I only need to point out that if you pick one thing and say that's a correlation, it may not be the significant one.

That's been the downfall of many medical studies, too, mistaking correlation for causation.
Im not saying religious people are criminals or that their religion makes them criminals.

Only that our prisons are full of religious people. Which is supported by the stats. You and FZ seem to think I am tarring all believers with the same brush.
UIR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-08-2016, 12:50
fastzombie
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 5,464
Indeed. There's a New Agey attitude that anything religious or 'spiritual' - whatever the f*** that means - is inherently benign. All the nasty stuff is dismissed as an extremist fringe or somehow not real religion.

Using that cretinous reasoning, Saudi Arabia isn't really a religious country. In which case, it's a bit of a mystery why they base all their barbaric laws on a religious text?
Then by all means move to north Korea to see what a shining example a completely atheist secular society can achieve.

Or you can accept the fact that however much you hate it, religious freedom is a part of secular democracy.
fastzombie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-08-2016, 12:50
UIR
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,048
You could also say that the vast majority of black Protestants do not end up in prison.

See it depends how you look at statistics.

Maybe religion has helped many to deal with poverty.
Maybe.

Or, maybe its kept millions in poverty.
UIR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-08-2016, 12:51
UIR
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,048
Then by all means move to north Korea to see what a shining example a completely atheist secular society can achieve.

Or you can accept the fact that however much you hate it, religious freedom is a part of secular democracy.
Shame religious societies dont feel the same though?

North Korea was a laughable example.
UIR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-08-2016, 12:54
be more pacific
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 16,034
Then by all means move to north Korea to see what a shining example a completely atheist secular society can achieve.

Or you can accept the fact that however much you hate it, religious freedom is a part of secular democracy.
You do love a bit of Whataboutism. While completely ignoring the whole point about the "they're not really religious" excuses made whenever atrocities are committed in the name of religion.
be more pacific is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-08-2016, 13:00
fastzombie
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 5,464
We have a legal system to determine whether or not someone is guilty. I'm not sure what your point is here... do you?

And I haven't tried at all, I googled religion in prisons. That was all the effort it took to dismiss claims by believers that prisoners are not religious.

The numbers of people in prison are also a fraction of those not in prison, so how exactly am I essentially criminalising the religious for my own purposes? Could you try and make more sense?
It's hard to give a coherent reply to what's essentially incoherent. Forgive me.

Now can you provide me with the links to show me where religious belief, that is the actual practice of moral, ethical or ritual doctrine is directly causal to criminal activity and prison populations.

Religious affiliation just means, I was baptised CofE then went on to mug pensioners for drug money. I ticked CofE on the box because it'll help with the parole board and it's nice to get out of my cell for an hour. That's evidence of nothing other than the will to believe what you want to make of it sorry.
fastzombie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-08-2016, 13:04
UIR
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,048
It's hard to give a coherent reply to what's essentially incoherent. Forgive me.

Now can you provide me with the links to show me where religious belief, that is the actual practice of moral, ethical or ritual doctrine is directly causal to criminal activity and prison populations.

Religious affiliation just means, I was baptised CofE then went on to mug pensioners for drug money. I ticked CofE on the box because it'll help with the parole board and it's nice to get out of my cell for an hour. That's evidence of nothing other than the will to believe what you want to make of it sorry.
Could you try and make more sense? =/= It's hard to give a coherent reply to what's essentially incoherent

UIR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-08-2016, 13:07
be more pacific
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 16,034
It's hard to give a coherent reply to what's essentially incoherent. Forgive me.

Now can you provide me with the links to show me where religious belief, that is the actual practice of moral, ethical or ritual doctrine is directly causal to criminal activity and prison populations.

Religious affiliation just means, I was baptised CofE then went on to mug pensioners for drug money. I ticked CofE on the box because it'll help with the parole board and it's nice to get out of my cell for an hour. That's evidence of nothing other than the will to believe what you want to make of it sorry.
So the prisoners are claiming religion out of non-religious self-interest? Meanwhile, the parole board take religion into account because it apparently makes people better?

Are you saying religion is great either way, whether it's being abused as an excuse or taken into account as a genuine benefit?
be more pacific is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-08-2016, 13:11
fastzombie
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 5,464
You do love a bit of Whataboutism. While completely ignoring the whole point about the "they're not really religious" excuses made whenever atrocities are committed in the name of religion.
Well if whataboutism is about being able to respond in kind, you bet I do.

Is there some invoking of a rule that you can't have a fair balanced discussion with an atheist or something.

The fact is they're not really religious, if people rob and kill and abuse others for no good reason they're not being good Christians.

Of course if a man steals or sells drugs to feed his starving kids that's more understandable and more an indictment of the society he finds himself in. Although from an anti-theist point of view he's damned if he does or doesn't. He let his kids starve to death because of the laws made by the sky fairy, or he's a hypocrite for going against the laws he claims to try and live by.

If on the other hand he's dealing for the bling, the big car and to look like the big man, then no he's failed as a Christian.
fastzombie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-08-2016, 13:12
bollywood
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 35,216
Im not saying religious people are criminals or that their religion makes them criminals.

Only that our prisons are full of religious people. Which is supported by the stats. You and FZ seem to think I am tarring all believers with the same brush.
Well one could get the impression that you are implying causality.

Blacks and Latinos (where religion is more inherent in the culture) are also more likely to go to prison than whites for the same crime.

So how does that change your conclusion? More blacks are in prison and they tend to be Protestant.
bollywood is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 29-08-2016, 13:13
fastzombie
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 5,464
Could you try and make more sense? =/= It's hard to give a coherent reply to what's essentially incoherent

Fine if that's all you have.
fastzombie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-08-2016, 13:17
be more pacific
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 16,034
Well if whataboutism is about being able to respond in kind, you bet I do.

Is there some invoking of a rule that you can't have a fair balanced discussion with an atheist or something.

The fact is they're not really religious, if people rob and kill and abuse others for no good reason they're not being good Christians.

Of course if a man steals or sells drugs to feed his starving kids that's more understandable and more an indictment of the society he finds himself in. Although from an anti-theist point of view he's damned if he does or doesn't. He let his kids starve to death because of the laws made by the sky fairy, or he's a hypocrite for going against the laws he claims to try and live by.

If on the other hand he's dealing for the bling, the big car and to look like the big man, then no he's failed as a Christian.
Are the laws of Saudi Arabia really religious: YES or NO?
be more pacific is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-08-2016, 13:17
fastzombie
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 5,464
So the prisoners are claiming religion out of non-religious self-interest? Meanwhile, the parole board take religion into account because it apparently makes people better?

Are you saying religion is great either way, whether it's being abused as an excuse or taken into account as a genuine benefit?


How am I saying that exactly.

Like anything it can be used for good, or abused for bad.

Parole boards take a lot of things into account, often quite mistakenly IMO.

But that is a part of the system, and people realise how to manipulate it.
fastzombie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-08-2016, 13:17
fastzombie
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 5,464
Are the laws of Saudi Arabia really religious: YES or NO?
As far as I'm aware, Yes.
fastzombie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-08-2016, 13:18
Richard46
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: London
Posts: 41,696
Well I did and I thought we had this discussion in the past as well.

I can't say it was not only religion that was her reason but that would be unusual.

What I said was judges don't always tell you what they know or is said in chambers.
By avoiding my very reasonable question you illustrate far more effectively than I could anxiety to defend religious privilege. Thanks; You have exceed my highest hopes.
Richard46 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-08-2016, 13:32
bollywood
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 35,216
By avoiding my very reasonable question you illustrate far more effectively than I could anxiety to defend religious privilege. Thanks; You have exceed my highest hopes.
Rather an unsupported comment about anxiety isn't it.

My comment was not actually about religion at all but about how judges usually operate and surprise that a judge would sentence on just one factor
bollywood is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 29-08-2016, 13:36
fastzombie
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 5,464
By avoiding my very reasonable question you illustrate far more effectively than I could anxiety to defend religious privilege. Thanks; You have exceed my highest hopes.
I quite honestly disagree with Bolly on this one. I think some element of religious bias was at work here and it was wrong.

I honestly don't want to fall out with you but for Christ's sake, read some of the borderline hate talk that's being posted on this thread, and the back slapping agreement, not to mention the flimsy pseudoscientific justification of such.

Do you honestly wonder at the anxiety to defend when faced with this level of - I'm not even going to f**k around - bigotry that's being spewed out.

This is grass roots hatred and propaganda, we should be anxious.

I'm sorry if this offends you but this is how I feel.
fastzombie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-08-2016, 13:41
bollywood
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 35,216
I quite honestly disagree with Bolly on this one. I think some element of religious bias was at work here and it was wrong.

I honestly don't want to fall out with you but for Christ's sake, read some of the borderline hate talk that's being posted on this thread, and the back slapping agreement, not to mention the flimsy pseudoscientific justification of such.

Do you honestly wonder at the anxiety to defend when faced with this level of - I'm not even going to f**k around - bigotry that's being spewed out.

This is grass roots hatred and propaganda, we should be anxious.

I'm sorry if this offends you but this is how I feel.
The thing is if it were just religion that made her favor the defendent, I would think it wrong too. My point was more about the legal aspect because in a number of cases I know the judge has made the decision before they sit on the bench. They look at a lot of data and they don't always reveal it.

I wasn't saying she didn't just use religion, just that I'd be surprised.

Judges can also be influenced like anyone ( knows the barrister or some such).
bollywood is online now   Reply With Quote
 
Reply




 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:34.