• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Soaps
EE: Smiley happy Stacy.....
<<
<
2 of 2
>>
>
Troian
30-08-2016
Originally Posted by Tomski12:
“Looks like we're being called morons over on Walford Web because of this thread I find some of them so arrogant sometimes. I personally quite enjoy the calmer Fowler Stacey. But I think she could do with that feisty Slater edge back that was a big part of her original stint.”

I looked at that place once and found it very strange and cliquey, everyone had the exact same opinion on everything, but then I guess you get called a 'moron' if you don't agree with the status quo there so probably quit posting
bass55
30-08-2016
Originally Posted by starry_rune:
“Do we really want to see this again?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OX5hKbzLPkk

not for me!”

Stacey and Kat were absolutely vile during that whole period. I'd rather not see that again.
BadLadAsh
30-08-2016
Originally Posted by Tomski12:
“Looks like we're being called morons over on Walford Web because of this thread I find some of them so arrogant sometimes. I personally quite enjoy the calmer Fowler Stacey. But I think she could do with that feisty Slater edge back that was a big part of her original stint.”

God how sad! People from another forum talking about people on another forum who are talking about a fictional character in a tv show. Lives needed
Troian
30-08-2016
'Nice' Stacey is definitely preferable to 'vile' Stacey but I agree there's something off and simple about Lacey Turner's interpretation of 'nice' Stacey. There's a skill to playing nice and normal and I don't think she has it, she's very limited and one dimensional. James Bye however plays the nice,normal, domestic Fowler set up very well.
londongirlGre
30-08-2016
Originally Posted by Troian:
“I looked at that place once and found it very strange and cliquey, everyone had the exact same opinion on everything, but then I guess you get called a 'moron' if you don't agree with the status quo there so probably quit posting ”

They do! I used to post on there but they were quite rude to me one time so I stopped. I started posting on the site again because of the Denise storyline. I wanted to present the view that its possible that Kush is the father of Denise's baby. Everyone on there is convinced that Phil is the dad.
Tomski12
30-08-2016
Originally Posted by londongirlGre:
“They do! I used to post on there but they were quite rude to me one time so I stopped. I started posting on the site again because of the Denise storyline. I wanted to present the view that its possible that Kush is the father of Denise's baby. Everyone on there is convinced that Phil is the dad.”

I know it's really strange. I know I'm a bit biased towards Ronnie, but the other week a poster created a thread asking who would miss Ronnie. Everybody on that thread suddenly started posting abuse at him for liking Ronnie and that she was a vile character. (Which I understand) but felt sorry for this guy, Daniel something.
londongirlGre
30-08-2016
Originally Posted by Tomski12:
“I know it's really strange. I know I'm a bit biased towards Ronnie, but the other week a poster created a thread asking who would miss Ronnie. Everybody on that thread suddenly started posting abuse at him for liking Ronnie and that she was a vile character. (Which I understand) but felt sorry for this guy, Daniel something.”

I saw that. The posters on here are much nicer.
MR_Pitkin
30-08-2016
Horrid character no matter what she's doing, fast forward all her scenes.
Luner13
30-08-2016
Originally Posted by MR_Pitkin:
“Horrid character no matter what she's doing, fast forward all her scenes.”

You and me both
LHolmes
30-08-2016
Originally Posted by Tomski12:
“Looks like we're being called morons over on Walford Web because of this thread I find some of them so arrogant sometimes. I personally quite enjoy the calmer Fowler Stacey. But I think she could do with that feisty Slater edge back that was a big part of her original stint.”

Some of those guys need to get out more.

I once made a post about Jay on here and someone actually referenced it and picked it apart over there. Sue Osman or somebody. I am not a member but saw it by lurking. What's the point of that? If you want to debate a point I've made, join this forum and do it directly.
spunger
30-08-2016
Originally Posted by PorkchopExpress:
“Doesn't sit right. Seems Lacey Turner can't act a happy character.”

Happy Stacey or miserable is the same to me and that is because Lacey Turner cannot act to save her life. Every scene is just her gnashing her teeth and extreme gurning. Horrendous actress who goes against the very basics of acting.
sorcha_healy27
30-08-2016
Originally Posted by bass55:
“I hated Stacey when she was going around punching people and sleeping with anything that had a pulse. So give me grown up Stacey over that any day.”

Indeed..

I much prefer this Stacey.
Tomski12
30-08-2016
Originally Posted by LHolmes:
“Some of those guys need to get out more.

I once made a post about Jay on here and someone actually referenced it and picked it apart over there. Sue Osman or somebody. I am not a member but saw it by lurking. What's the point of that? If you want to debate a point I've made, join this forum and do it directly.”

http://walfordweb.com/topic/11554974/474/

Looks like they've apologised for that mate. Not all of them seem that bad there's just a few I've noticed who seem a bit arrogant.
TheGraduate2012
30-08-2016
Originally Posted by LHolmes:
“This.

Stacey and Martin work well as a couple and it's revived the Fowlers as a unit in the show. And Stacey still has an edge as we saw a couple of months ago when she handed Sharon her arse for harassing her over Max.”

Exactly. Even Belinda's mock gobbiness is getting tired. I know EE is supposed to be edgy but sometimes a bit of friendship is a welcomed reprieve.
B*witched
31-08-2016
Originally Posted by sorcha_healy27:
“Indeed..

I much prefer this Stacey.”

So do I. Give me happy Stacey over moody sour Stacey and I'm not even a particular fan of hers most of the time. I enjoyed the last ep of EE it was lighter and more fun to watch that the usual load of misery they have on the show.
pete137
31-08-2016
Stacey looks and acts like she is in her mid 40's these days. Baggy jumpers, scraggy hair, washed out look about her. What went wrong.
PorkchopExpress
01-09-2016
Stupid gormless grin on Stacy's face tonight. Terrible acting.
Broken_Arrow
02-09-2016
Lacey Turner is quite a limited actress really. She can't act "nice" convincingly. It just comes across as fake. I'm sure she's perfectly nice in reality but probably not as happy and cheery as Stacey is meant to be lately. That said, it could just be that Stacey has spent so many years with a miserable frown plastered over her face that Lacey isn't used to playing the character in a different way.
Kate Ford fan
02-09-2016
Originally Posted by Broken_Arrow:
“Lacey Turner is quite a limited actress really. She can't act "nice" convincingly. It just comes across as fake. I'm sure she's perfectly nice in reality but probably not as happy and cheery as Stacey is meant to be lately. That said, it could just be that Stacey has spent so many years with a miserable frown plastered over her face that Lacey isn't used to playing the character in a different way.”

I have to agree with that. Lacey Turner seems like one of those actresses that thrives on the high-octane drama but is very mediocre when it comes to the day to day episodes. One of the most inconsistant actresses I ever seen as it seems to be all or nothing with her.
<<
<
2 of 2
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map