|
||||||||
Can't Pay or We'll take it away (Series 4 Part 2) |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#226 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 77
|
Quote:
Steve Pinner is on next week's episode.
If you think about it, there are a lot of bailiff pairings to show (Del and Dael, Paul and Steve, Stewart and Elmor, Brian and Del, Ben and Steve, and now the two Welsh bailiffs) so obviously not all of them can be shown every week. Sometimes bailiff pairings aren't shown for a few episodes. Also, bear in mind that Paul Bohill is now 72, and so likely to be in semi-retirement. There might be less Paul and Steve segments to show. I know for a fact that C5 filmed over 30 hours of Paul in the last two months. Paul works 24/7 , So no way is he in the semi retirement bracket. How do you know how old he is? And what has age got to do with anything? |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#227 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 77
|
Quote:
That episode was funny .From the second she opens the door and says "there's no TranTOR here" you knew she was lying .It was frustrating that they tried to string it out so long , and even tried to blag it when she called him "And " LOL. Then they find the invoice with his name on it - hysterical .
So Paul Bohill is 72 ?!! he's my fave one to watch, him and Steve .But if they ever got into a fight ,I don't think they'd do too well at their age . Trust me on this. If Paul or Steve found themselves in a violent situation they would do very well. .. Promise.I would be worried for the assailant. |
|
|
|
|
|
#228 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Glasgow - Land of everypoo
Posts: 5,378
|
Quote:
Trust me on this. If Paul or Steve found themselves in a violent situation they would do very well. .. Promise.I would be worried for the assailant. Yeah I like Paul and Steve. .very fair and professional and keep calm in difficult situations and act sympathetically when a situation calls for it..it can't be fun attending eviction procedures..what a job. |
|
|
|
|
|
#229 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,181
|
Quote:
Trust me on this. If Paul or Steve found themselves in a violent situation they would do very well. .. Promise.I would be worried for the assailant. |
|
|
|
|
|
#230 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 191
|
Just watched yesterday's. So that first chap in the nice house in Manchester could afford to pay up even though he refused to for over two hours. Funny how it took the threat of removing goods to suddenly make him realise he could pay after all.
I used to think that making you prove that goods in a house were not yours with receipts etc was unfair as most people do not hold onto receipts years later. But I've realised if this wasn't the case debtors would simply deny any goods were ever theirs, leaving the sheriffs pretty much powerless. I also wonder about these solicitors some of the debtors call who claim the sheriffs can't enforce the writ beacuse they've applied to set the judgment aside. Surely as a solicitor they should know the law thus realise that unless the judgment has been officially set aside, the writ still stands?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#231 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 7,436
|
Quote:
Trust me on this. If Paul or Steve found themselves in a violent situation they would do very well. .. Promise.I would be worried for the assailant. |
|
|
|
|
|
#232 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Midlands
Posts: 2,031
|
Quote:
Surely as a solicitor they should know the law thus realise that unless the judgment has been officially set aside, the writ still stands?
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#233 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Glasgow - Land of everypoo
Posts: 5,378
|
Quote:
yes, it's surprising how few of them seem to know the law regarding High Court writs. The police too, don't always seem too sure. Us viewers probably know more now!
I reckon the solicitors know fine well..they can probably bill for advice over the phone. .:-o As for the police they probably won't be too familiar with the ins and outs as it's a civil matter. .civil but a bit scary! |
|
|
|
|
|
#234 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Oct 2016
Posts: 323
|
another houseproud single mother, how does one get to such a state.
good job we don't have smell-i-vision. look after a baby and keep the house tidy, no job or other commitments, is it that difficult really ? |
|
|
|
|
|
#235 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 191
|
Quote:
another houseproud single mother, how does one get to such a state.
good job we don't have smell-i-vision. look after a baby and keep the house tidy, no job or other commitments, is it that difficult really ? |
|
|
|
|
|
#236 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Between Venus and Mars
Posts: 9,023
|
Quote:
Just watched yesterday's. So that first chap in the nice house in Manchester could afford to pay up even though he refused to for over two hours. Funny how it took the threat of removing goods to suddenly make him realise he could pay after all.
I used to think that making you prove that goods in a house were not yours with receipts etc was unfair as most people do not hold onto receipts years later. But I've realised if this wasn't the case debtors would simply deny any goods were ever theirs, leaving the sheriffs pretty much powerless. I also wonder about these solicitors some of the debtors call who claim the sheriffs can't enforce the writ beacuse they've applied to set the judgment aside. Surely as a solicitor they should know the law thus realise that unless the judgment has been officially set aside, the writ still stands? ![]() However if it's the debtors home then i do agree with proof of goods not being the debtors should be shown. |
|
|
|
|
|
#237 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Between Venus and Mars
Posts: 9,023
|
Quote:
Was thinking the same. Poor baby. I believe the landlord's version of events there.
I actually do believe the landlord when he said she asked to be evicted. I felt sorry for the poor baby. |
|
|
|
|
|
#238 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Derby
Posts: 7,363
|
Quote:
another houseproud single mother, how does one get to such a state.
good job we don't have smell-i-vision. look after a baby and keep the house tidy, no job or other commitments, is it that difficult really ? Get your kid to the Council, love. And dont get me started on the cantankerous old Optician. |
|
|
|
|
#239 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Between Venus and Mars
Posts: 9,023
|
Quote:
You read my mind. That place looked an absolute sty. All she had to do was get herself and her son to to the Council and all she cared abour were her shitty, worthless possessions and her lovely big telly.
Get your kid to the Council, love. And dont get me started on the cantankerous old Optician. |
|
|
|
|
|
#240 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 172
|
They should be able to call Social Services when they see a child living in those conditions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#241 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 21,729
|
Quote:
another houseproud single mother, how does one get to such a state.
good job we don't have smell-i-vision. look after a baby and keep the house tidy, no job or other commitments, is it that difficult really ? |
|
|
|
|
|
#242 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Between Venus and Mars
Posts: 9,023
|
Quote:
They should be able to call Social Services when they see a child living in those conditions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#243 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 21,729
|
Quote:
They should be able to call Social Services when they see a child living in those conditions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#244 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Oct 2016
Posts: 323
|
Quote:
I'm thinking there may have been some sort of mental illness involved. That is quite often the case when people are living in conditions like that.
as my old mum would have said, it's just lazyitis. |
|
|
|
|
|
#245 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 21,729
|
Quote:
a mental illness that causes someone to ignore basic house cleaning duties, food preparation and personal hygiene in order to watch tv all day, come on, really ?
as my old mum would have said, it's just lazyitis. |
|
|
|
|
|
#246 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 9,644
|
Just caught up with the series on Sky+. Bloody hell, that flat was an utter shithole! How can anyone live like that with an 11 MONTH toddler?!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#247 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 2,961
|
Quote:
Rubbish.
I know for a fact that C5 filmed over 30 hours of Paul in the last two months. Paul works 24/7 , So no way is he in the semi retirement bracket. How do you know how old he is? And what has age got to do with anything? Paul clearly does not "work 24/7"- how would he have time to sleep? He's always complaining about waiting around because he wants to go home, so he obviously doesn't work all the time. I know how old he is because DCBL, the High Court Enforcement Company which Paul works for, recently sent out a tweet wishing him a happy 72nd birthday, and saying he was now Britain's Oldest Bailiff. "What does his age have to do with anything?", you ask? Well, you may not be aware of this but when people get to their mid-60s, they normally do something called "retirement", where they stop working and are paid a pension. It is very rare for a person to continue working past the age of 70. So it would be most unusual if the 72 hear old Paul Bohill was not in semi-retirement at least. |
|
|
|
|
|
#248 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 7,436
|
Quote:
How do you know that Channel 5 have filmed that much? You seem to be very angry about this for no reason.
Paul clearly does not "work 24/7"- how would he have time to sleep? He's always complaining about waiting around because he wants to go home, so he obviously doesn't work all the time. I know how old he is because DCBL, the High Court Enforcement Company which Paul works for, recently sent out a tweet wishing him a happy 72nd birthday, and saying he was now Britain's Oldest Bailiff. "What does his age have to do with anything?", you ask? Well, you may not be aware of this but when people get to their mid-60s, they normally do something called "retirement", where they stop working and are paid a pension. It is very rare for a person to continue working past the age of 70. So it would be most unusual if the 72 hear old Paul Bohill was not in semi-retirement at least. |
|
|
|
|
|
#249 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,200
|
Quote:
I really don't get why programmes like this are so popular. In my opinion it is just pure negativity, and frankly once you've seen one case you've seen them all.
The show masquerades as social commentary, like many others in the genre, but really I think its main target audience is people who just enjoy watching aggro and aggression, not unlike Jeremy Kyle viewers in fact. |
|
|
|
|
|
#250 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Derby
Posts: 7,363
|
Quote:
thats exactly what i thought. how can anyone watch other peoples misery like that? its sickening.
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 04:36.




Trust me on this. If Paul or Steve found themselves in a violent situation they would do very well. .. Promise.
