Originally Posted by Glendarroch:
“That sounds much more directly racist and shocking though. There's s nothing derogatory about the word Roots or the reference to the TV series or book is there? It was an odd reference, given how long ago the series aired ( although Eva claimed to have grown up with it) and it did give me pause for thought, but tbh I could imagine it being the sort of thing people WOULD say. I hear or read offensive remarks about Scots all the time in the media. It's s annoying but you don't call for the entire programme to be banned.”
“That sounds much more directly racist and shocking though. There's s nothing derogatory about the word Roots or the reference to the TV series or book is there? It was an odd reference, given how long ago the series aired ( although Eva claimed to have grown up with it) and it did give me pause for thought, but tbh I could imagine it being the sort of thing people WOULD say. I hear or read offensive remarks about Scots all the time in the media. It's s annoying but you don't call for the entire programme to be banned.”
The word Roots in and of itself isn't racist at all. I think people felt interpreted to mean that Eva was comparing her hair to a slave's hair. That might not have been the writers intent with that line but that is how some interpreted it to mean. Which is why it should have been avoided in the first place. I do agree that the show shouldn't be canceled for it, the apology was enough.




i didn't like Elsie Tanner either, I loved Annie Walker though
”
Really? I never got that meaning at all! I don't t remember the TV series - I was very young when it came out, - and it's s many years since I read the book, but I thought people would get the gist f the title. Saying, that Eva probably thought it really was a phrase about hair, not that it was a play on words