|
||||||||
EastEnders is really poor at the moment |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 4,686
|
EastEnders is really poor at the moment
I am still feeling angry about how terrible last night's episode was. Who on earth thought Shakil's 16th birthday party would make an acceptable 30 minutes of prime time TV viewing? It was cringeworthy not just because of the subject matter, but also because of the horrifically bad acting.
It doesn't make sense that characters like Shakil are being kept on, while the wonderful Les and Pam have been axed because the writers cannot be bothered to stretch their imaginations just a little and come up with more material for them. |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 6,076
|
It really is, watching that clip from 2010 that someone posted here the other day shows just how downhill it's gone
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 31,001
|
I don't think it was awful but it was a very clumsy way of getting Mark and Courtney together and exposing Denise's pregnancy. I'm disappointed in how they're handling both these s/ls.
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 4,686
|
The Mark and Courtney scenes are incredibly contrived and the dialogue is cringeworthy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 4,686
|
Is this the work of Treadwell-Collins or Sean o'Connor? I know the latter appears on the credits, but might these still be DTC's last stories playing out? If it is O'Connors, I really fear for the future of EastEnders if this first few weeks are anything to go by.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 7,927
|
I've been saying this for weeks now.
The show has been in decline since 2011, and this is by far worse than a lot of Kirkwood's work. The show feels like it's in another Newman lull. Nothing remotely interesting happening, dull characters, dull storylines, lack of long term characters and way too much focus on the teens, which just makes the show one big cringe. Yes, next week looks brilliant, but no doubt it will be good for a couple of weeks, before becoming completely trash again. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Alcohol aisle in Tescos *gulp*
Posts: 12,043
|
To be honest, centering an episode around Shakil's birthday and him wanting to get into Bex's knickers is never going to be a hit is it?
Unfortunately, the show has been so boring lately. There have been some decent episodes and scenes, but they are swamped by dull storylines and characters. It doesn't help the show is inconsistent and the quality changes almost each episode. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 5,212
|
To be fair, soaps are ongoing programmes and, with the amount they have to churn out, it would be near impossible to maintain a certain standard. Let's not forget this is all being produced by human beings, so storylines, writing and acting will have highs and lows. Let's take Corrie - its been on for 56 years now. Add to the fact that you cannot please all of the people all of the time, so one man's meat will be another's poison etc.
I do sometimes think that we may expect a little too much from our soaps. Just enjoy the highs and hope the lows don't last...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Suck it
Posts: 7,777
|
Apparently Batten and Lamb have been in charge of the episodes in recent weeks. Makes you wonder if Kirkwood and Newman were really to blame for the poor quality of their eras.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 592
|
It's been awful, sensationalist rubbish for a while now. The DTC/Lamb era is truly awful.
Best to stop watching untill SOC's work appears, he might give us good, gritty and down to earth EE back. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Plymouth Devon
Posts: 12,497
|
Its ok but not brilliant. Hope next week is good
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 9,086
|
Its been pretty dire.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 2,019
|
It was one of the worst episodes ever made they have downed tools for years now. It will never match or beat the great era's it once had.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 13,401
|
Some of last nights episode was some of the worst I have ever watched in EastEnders, Ben, Jay, NuFowlers and Kush were the only good things I have to say.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,900
|
Do what I do. Read the spoilers and watch if they interest you.
transition periods are often dreadful.
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: I like to singy singy singy...
Posts: 17,667
|
I've missed a few episodes and nothing much interests me about the show anymore. Even the characters I liked act stupidly so Im not sure I want to watch them any longer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 226
|
Quote:
Its been pretty dire.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 3,749
|
Don't worry, Grant's back next week.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 7,927
|
Quote:
Apparently Batten and Lamb have been in charge of the episodes in recent weeks. Makes you wonder if Kirkwood and Newman were really to blame for the poor quality of their eras.
![]() ![]() Says it all. Kirkwood's era was nowhere near as bad as people make out on here in my honest opinion. Newman's was awful, but that was because nothing happened. If she'd actually put in some effort to the storylines, it would have been a lot better. |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Emmerdale
Posts: 4,290
|
I think its alright
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,900
|
Quote:
I've missed a few episodes and nothing much interests me about the show anymore. Even the characters I liked act stupidly so Im not sure I want to watch them any longer.
Fresh and interesting characters leave without being given proper chances to to flourish. While others remain there for years going around in circles. Most of the time now when they bring in new characters they are 2 dimensional or the writers use them as a pet project for some agenda or other. That's why I just read the spoilers now and watch if it sounds interesting. However, I don't always read the spoilers anymore. There is currently about 7 characters I am only remotely interested in. So will soon be walking away from it for good.
Spoiler
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 7,927
|
Quote:
It was one of the worst episodes ever made they have downed tools for years now. It will never match or beat the great era's it once had.
![]() Sad really. |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 31,192
|
Quote:
I've missed a few episodes and nothing much interests me about the show anymore. Even the characters I liked act stupidly so Im not sure I want to watch them any longer.
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Martin Fowler
Posts: 11,362
|
Quote:
I've missed a few episodes and nothing much interests me about the show anymore. Even the characters I liked act stupidly so Im not sure I want to watch them any longer.
This week has been dire. An entire episode devoted to Shakil's birthday party and parts of it felt more like a sex ed documentary than a soap opera. I think tonight's episode revolves around Kim's salsa class so thats another one to delight in. |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 31,192
|
Quote:
BIB: Spot on, you know its bad when you're not interested or enjoying characters that you usually like.
This week has been dire. An entire episode devoted to Shakil's birthday party and parts of it felt more like a sex ed documentary than a soap opera. I think tonight's episode revolves around Kim's salsa class so thats another one to delight in. |
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 12:20.




