Round 2
Frankie 13.40% - 11.74% = 1.66%
Aubrey 13.77% - 11.13% = 2.64%
Bear 13.47% - 12.15% = 1.32%
Grant 16.13% - 8.29% 7.84%
Frankie 13.40% - 11.74% = 1.66%
Aubrey 13.77% - 11.13% = 2.64%
Bear 13.47% - 12.15% = 1.32%
Grant 16.13% - 8.29% 7.84%
[GAME] Celebrity Big Brother 2016: Who Wins, DS Decides
8 of 8
Round 3
Frankie 18.30% - 15.68% = 2.62%
Aubrey 17.57% - 14.28% = 3.29%
Grant 18.87% - 12.77% = 6.10%
Frankie 18.30% - 15.68% = 2.62%
Aubrey 17.57% - 14.28% = 3.29%
Grant 18.87% - 12.77% = 6.10%
b]Overall[/b]
Frankie 11.81% - 10.11% = 1.70%
Katie 3.67% - 3.66% = 0.01%
Aubrey 16.07% - 11.36% = 4.71%
Bear 7.34% - 6.61% = 0.73%
Grant 18.38% - 10.95% = 7.43%
Frankie 11.81% - 10.11% = 1.70%
Katie 3.67% - 3.66% = 0.01%
Aubrey 16.07% - 11.36% = 4.71%
Bear 7.34% - 6.61% = 0.73%
Grant 18.38% - 10.95% = 7.43%
Hello everyone! Results for other evctions will be posted once I get my laptop fixed. I would like to thank all of you for taking part of this series and making it a good one. I would like to apologize for my tardiness and delays and absence and I would avoid that on my future games. I hope you had fun in here as much as I did, it was great communicating to you all. Thank you for those who participated in nominations and in voting. I would be back in January when the next CBB airs and I would launching a game over on the X Factor thread by October/November, I hope you could check it out when it starts. To all silent readers and silent voters, thanj you. To you reading this, THANK YOU!!!
Originally Posted by simonb451:
“How did Grant win, he was first out!”
“How did Grant win, he was first out!”
Well this is DS Decides, this may not mirror what is on the real show, like on the BB17 game, Marco was first out but placed 9th in the game. Actually, on all weeks that Grant was nominated, he always placed first.
Originally Posted by hashtag_mccoydl:
“Round 4
Aubrey 28.32% - 20.01 = 8.31%
Grant 32.78% - 17.82% = 14.56%”
“Round 4
Aubrey 28.32% - 20.01 = 8.31%
Grant 32.78% - 17.82% = 14.56%”
Could i ask if you would be prepared to post all the actual points not just the %? As this would give a clearer and more accurate picture of the final gap between the two or at the very least reveal how many people voted as without a total to work from, the percentages mean nothing?
Originally Posted by hashtag_mccoydl:
“Hello everyone! Results for other evctions will be posted once I get my laptop fixed. I would like to thank all of you for taking part of this series and making it a good one. I would like to apologize for my tardiness and delays and absence and I would avoid that on my future games. I hope you had fun in here as much as I did, it was great communicating to you all. Thank you for those who participated in nominations and in voting. I would be back in January when the next CBB airs and I would launching a game over on the X Factor thread by October/November, I hope you could check it out when it starts. To all silent readers and silent voters, thanj you. To you reading this, THANK YOU!!!”
“Hello everyone! Results for other evctions will be posted once I get my laptop fixed. I would like to thank all of you for taking part of this series and making it a good one. I would like to apologize for my tardiness and delays and absence and I would avoid that on my future games. I hope you had fun in here as much as I did, it was great communicating to you all. Thank you for those who participated in nominations and in voting. I would be back in January when the next CBB airs and I would launching a game over on the X Factor thread by October/November, I hope you could check it out when it starts. To all silent readers and silent voters, thanj you. To you reading this, THANK YOU!!!”
Thankyou for sticking with it and making it to the end despite whatever problems you had. Better late than never is what i say !
I feel the main reason Grant won was an anti-vote against Aubrey not because anyone really liked him. He didnt really do anything of note in CBB (good or bad), can't remember anything about his time in CBB? I can't see any reason why anyone would want him to win, however i can imagine people voting him, not because they wanted him to win but because they didnt want Audrey to.
Originally Posted by Barracute:
“Could i ask if you would be prepared to post all the actual points not just the %? As this would give a clearer and more accurate picture of the final gap between the two or at the very least reveal how many people voted as without a total to work from, the percentages mean nothing?”
“Could i ask if you would be prepared to post all the actual points not just the %? As this would give a clearer and more accurate picture of the final gap between the two or at the very least reveal how many people voted as without a total to work from, the percentages mean nothing?”
Votes for Round 4
Aubrey 255 - 90
Grant 235 - 120
Total votes
Aubrey 712 - 503 = 209
Grant 814 - 448 = 366
Originally Posted by hashtag_mccoydl:
“Votes for Round 4
Aubrey 255 - 90
Grant 235 - 120
Total votes
Aubrey 712 - 503 = 209
Grant 814 - 448 = 366”
“Votes for Round 4
Aubrey 255 - 90
Grant 235 - 120
Total votes
Aubrey 712 - 503 = 209
Grant 814 - 448 = 366”
Thanks - when you say ROUND 4 is that the total of the votes that were ONLY cast when it was down to the final 2 because if that is the total of the votes IN round 4 not an aggregate, then it doesnt add up? are the figures save and evict - ie A got 255 to save and 90 to evict? or is it 90 to evict and 255 to save? going by the total of 700 pts there were 7 voters, you know what my votes were and so you know why the maths does not add up - regardless which way round it is - if you deduct my vote from 90, the remainder should be at least 60 - if each of those 6 other voters had to give a minimum of 10 as you stated, but the remainder is less than 60 in that section which should not be possible?
Originally Posted by Barracute:
“Thanks - when you say ROUND 4 is that the total of the votes that were ONLY cast when it was down to the final 2 because if that is the total of the votes IN round 4 not an aggregate, then it doesnt add up? are the figures save and evict - ie A got 255 to save and 90 to evict? or is it 90 to evict and 255 to save? going by the total of 700 pts there were 7 voters, you know what my votes were and so you know why the maths does not add up - regardless which way round it is - if you deduct my vote from 90, the remainder should be at least 60 - if each of those 6 other voters had to give a minimum of 10 as you stated, but the remainder is less than 60 in that section which should not be possible?”
“Thanks - when you say ROUND 4 is that the total of the votes that were ONLY cast when it was down to the final 2 because if that is the total of the votes IN round 4 not an aggregate, then it doesnt add up? are the figures save and evict - ie A got 255 to save and 90 to evict? or is it 90 to evict and 255 to save? going by the total of 700 pts there were 7 voters, you know what my votes were and so you know why the maths does not add up - regardless which way round it is - if you deduct my vote from 90, the remainder should be at least 60 - if each of those 6 other voters had to give a minimum of 10 as you stated, but the remainder is less than 60 in that section which should not be possible?”
I had fixed your votes because you did 100save - 100evict, it was 100 overall and that was what everyone did. So I fixed Grant's evict and Aubrey's save from 90-90-10-10 because it had a 200pts total and turned it into 40-40-10-10.
Round 4 Vote Breakdown
Aubrey
To Win: 60, 45, 40, 35, 35, 30, 10
To Evict: 20, 20, 10, 10, 10, 10, 10
Grant
To Win: 60, 45, 40, 35, 25, 20, 10
To Evict: 40, 30, 10, 10, 10, 10, 10
Aubrey
To Win: 60, 45, 40, 35, 35, 30, 10
To Evict: 20, 20, 10, 10, 10, 10, 10
Grant
To Win: 60, 45, 40, 35, 25, 20, 10
To Evict: 40, 30, 10, 10, 10, 10, 10
Originally Posted by hashtag_mccoydl:
“I had fixed your votes because you did 100save - 100evict, it was 100 overall and that was what everyone did. So I fixed Grant's evict and Aubrey's save from 90-90-10-10 because it had a 200pts total and turned it into 40-40-10-10.”
“I had fixed your votes because you did 100save - 100evict, it was 100 overall and that was what everyone did. So I fixed Grant's evict and Aubrey's save from 90-90-10-10 because it had a 200pts total and turned it into 40-40-10-10.”
Originally Posted by hashtag_mccoydl:
“Round 4 Vote Breakdown
Aubrey
To Win: 60, 45, 40, 35, 35, 30, 10
To Evict: 20, 20, 10, 10, 10, 10, 10
Grant
To Win: 60, 45, 40, 35, 25, 20, 10
To Evict: 40, 30, 10, 10, 10, 10, 10”
“Round 4 Vote Breakdown
Aubrey
To Win: 60, 45, 40, 35, 35, 30, 10
To Evict: 20, 20, 10, 10, 10, 10, 10
Grant
To Win: 60, 45, 40, 35, 25, 20, 10
To Evict: 40, 30, 10, 10, 10, 10, 10”
I did spot that i had made a mistake and factored in the correct amount of 40 not 90 (so 40 + 60 =100 so still 10 over the 90?), but it still does not add up? Looking at the above at the first column you have 60+20+60+40 = 180? the next is 45+20+45+30 = 140, then the third which is mine - 40+10+40+10 = 100 ? All the rest add up to a total less than 100? I can get it if those after me decided not give the full 100 but what i dont get is you say you adjusted my total because it should have added to 100 not 200 and yet those before me as stated above add up to MORE than a 100? I guess i must be missing something but i assumed each column of 4 should total 100 (or less, though why anyone would not use the full 100 i cannot imagine? and why would the last person give 10 across the board, what would that achieve exactly?! )
Originally Posted by Barracute:
“I did spot that i had made a mistake and factored in the correct amount of 40 not 90 (so 40 + 60 =100 so still 10 over the 90?), but it still does not add up? Looking at the above at the first column you have 60+20+60+40 = 180? the next is 45+20+45+30 = 140, then the third which is mine - 40+10+40+10 = 100 ? All the rest add up to a total less than 100? I can get it if those after me decided not give the full 100 but what i dont get is you say you adjusted my total because it should have added to 100 not 200 and yet those before me as stated above add up to MORE than a 100? I guess i must be missing something but i assumed each column of 4 should total 100 (or less, though why anyone would not use the full 100 i cannot imagine? and why would the last person give 10 across the board, what would that achieve exactly?! )”
“I did spot that i had made a mistake and factored in the correct amount of 40 not 90 (so 40 + 60 =100 so still 10 over the 90?), but it still does not add up? Looking at the above at the first column you have 60+20+60+40 = 180? the next is 45+20+45+30 = 140, then the third which is mine - 40+10+40+10 = 100 ? All the rest add up to a total less than 100? I can get it if those after me decided not give the full 100 but what i dont get is you say you adjusted my total because it should have added to 100 not 200 and yet those before me as stated above add up to MORE than a 100? I guess i must be missing something but i assumed each column of 4 should total 100 (or less, though why anyone would not use the full 100 i cannot imagine? and why would the last person give 10 across the board, what would that achieve exactly?! )”
I arranged the list by the numbers from highest to lowest.
Originally Posted by hashtag_mccoydl:
“I arranged the list by the numbers from highest to lowest.”
“I arranged the list by the numbers from highest to lowest.”
ah should have spotted that !
8 of 8
