Originally Posted by soulboy77:
“I for one just did not understand the formation Poch put out. We have been moaning about the lack of creativity and Saturday's set-up certainly wasn't going to help this with our most creative players sat on the bench. What was the point of playing 3 CMs and 2 strikers? It just played to West Hams strengths, all they had to do was just cut off the supply to our front men and we were toothless. I hope this was just an experiment because it nearly lost us the game, until the substitutions bought the formation back to one that could actually link up our play and get at them.
We were very lucky to nick the win!”
Fwiw, formations - with an 's'. Started out with an ill-fated diamond, then reverted to a near 4-4-2, then changed to the kitchen sink approach with the substitutions. Bilic fiddled but didn't change very much - from what I could see anyway. He has more limited resources, certainly to have effect at our level.
The irony is, of course, he has long been accused of not having a plan b, and in the past two weeks we've seen a total of four formations.
Two of those formations were becasue of Toby, plus the fact what he'd tried eariler (during Toby's injury, and H's) had stifled creativity and goals.
Against Bilic's three CDs, Poch's diamond was ineffective and so he changed after 20 mins or so.
The thing to understand I think is the extreme impact of losing a key player - H, then Toby -on your shape and tactics.
As for nicking the win - that's exactly the capability we were looking to add this season. Unlike before, we now have that end 10 mins if we need it - Sonny was classic the way he was aiming to get in the box and cause havoc. Wenger has built a career on it, it's important we've been able to add it.
Yes we were lucky to some degree but West Ham also didn't handle the pressure.