Originally Posted by anndra_w:
“I don't agree I'm just pointing out that in areas like education and health, yes the SNP have taken a different route that is undoubtedly left of centre. There's nothing left wing about asking the poorest members of society to take on debts of 40,000 as is the case down south and the SNP has refused to go down that route maintaining the principle of universal social security. They know that to move away from this model is a centre right solution that will lead to the wealthiest asking why they are subsidising the poor. If you look at the outrage from the unionist parties about the plans to redistribute wealth from the wealthiest council districts to help put more money into the poorest schools you can imagine what would happen if the SNP were to listen to Labour, tack right and ask the middle class to pay the same level of taxation they currently pay alongside tuition fee's. However on many area's there is little the SNP can do. Fiscally income tax is never going to raise much money alone and the SNP and a penny on the pound for every is much less unfair than taking more from the wealthiest via council tax.
They've got a couple of policies that may, at a push, be described as centre right when taken out of context however I don't think there's any discussion being had amongst serious individuals that the SNP are centre right, you guys can have that discussion amongst yourselves on here though.
The policies are aimed at delivering for the society as a whole and that is what social democratic parties do. The idea that they need to focus on policies on one section of society at the expense of every other section of society is stupidity. The idea that their policies are not social democratic, again is silly. Their flagship policies and also their mitigative policies are social democratic in nature. I don't know what promises the SNP made you but they have delivered far more effective government than administration in Holyrood's lifespan.”
I don't care what come before as they were just as bad, I'm not arguing that the SNP are different I'm arguing that they are the same as the other parties.
Show me exactly how they differ from the Tories and Labour in any significant way?
Show me any policies that have benefited the lowest in the society at the expense of the richest or indeed show show me any of their policies that are radically different from what came before.
I listed a whole lot of broken promises that the SNP have made but I suppose it's easier to ignore that part rather than see the reality of it.
The only thing that makes the SNP different from the others is that they have independence in their agenda.
You mentioned education fees as if the Scottish government pays for everything but you fail to mention that it's only tuition fees, Scottish students still get loans and the poorest don't go to University in the proportions they do in England. In fact, one can reasonably argue that because of the cost the Scottish government quotas preclude many Scots from getting to university.
However, Alex Salmond made a granite plaque that said the Scottish Givernment would keep this situation forever and so the SNP are stuck with a failing policy.
Just one of many, no different from political parties everywhere and if we were independent I suspect it would be no different, except right now we would be less well,off than we are now.