• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Broadcasting
BBC Loses Great British Bakeoff
<<
<
24 of 89
>>
>
mossy2103
15-09-2016
Originally Posted by Charnham:
“in fairness, GBBO is a rating juggernaut, and is posting ratings that VERY few shows can achieve these days. No new drama or comedy can do that simply by throwing money at it.

Every TV channels in the world would kill for a localised version of Bake Off, that is equally succesful, its demos may skew a little older than some channels would like but its no means a deal breaker.”

However that runs contrary to C4's remit to be " innovative, experimental and distinctive". **

Buying such a programme, ratings juggernaut or not, flies in the face of all of those requirements. Thet are certainly not being innovative by buying in a proven winner. They are not being experimental by doing so. And distinctive? Well, seeing as the BBC already had the programme, they are not doing anything that is distinctive.

And it is certainly not doing this:

"champion innovation in TV, film & digital – nurturing and growing new ideas, formats, views and voices, faces, talent, audiences and production companies."


** http://www.channel4.com/info/corpora...annel-4s-remit
Ash_M1
15-09-2016
Originally Posted by Charnham:
“in fairness, GBBO is a rating juggernaut, and is posting ratings that VERY few shows can achieve these days. No new drama or comedy can do that simply by throwing money at it.

Every TV channels in the world would kill for a localised version of Bake Off, that is equally succesful, its demos may skew a little older than some channels would like but its no means a deal breaker.”

Why is GBBO successful?

1. It is on the ad-free, prime-time BBC One
2.It's content and tone is very British, very BBC
3.The contestants are 'normal' and 'natural'
4.It is non-sensational, essentially easy watching
5.The roles Mel and Sue and Paul and Mary play
Evil Genius
15-09-2016
Originally Posted by Ryan_Richards:
“Could the BBC have a baking show Mary, Paul, Mel and Sue - just with a slightly different format and obviously a new name and theme song?

I think majority of the current audience would watch a baking show with those four on it.”

They could call it "Bakeaway"

They could get Brian Cant to sing the theme tune. "Bee Ayy Kee Eee...Bakeawayaway-awayway-awayaway-bakeaway-awayway bakeaway..."

I think its a goer...
Jellied Eel
15-09-2016
Originally Posted by Ash_M1:
“They have. It was called The Great British Bake Off.”

I don't get it.. Some time ago you were convinced that Top Gear would carry on just fine with a new set of presenters. So OK, that didn't exactly work out. Perhaps C4 will have better luck?

You also seem very disappointed that licence payer's money will no longer be going to a subsidiary of the Anti-Beeb, and C4 will be paying instead.

Surely you should be rejoicing at the prospect of filling the 30hr hole with something new, original and perhaps even from the Bbc? Show the Indies who really makes great TV..
Jellied Eel
15-09-2016
Originally Posted by Straker:
“They've bought the world's most expensive broom but by the time they get it both the handle and the brush have been swapped and it's no longer a special magic broom, just a rather ordinary one that can't quite get into the corners properly.”

Well, yes. But enough about Top Gear.. What do you think C4 will do with Bake Off?
madmusician
15-09-2016
Originally Posted by Jellied Eel:
“Well, yes. But enough about Top Gear.. What do you think C4 will do with Bake Off?”

BBC didn't buy the Top Gear format without the presenters. The BBC bought the format, but before thinking of an adequate post-CHM strategy, Clarkson's role as a BBC employee become untenable. It was, admittedly, an error for the BBC to not have a proper plan in place for post-CHM Top Gear, given that they had rights to the format and I am not claiming that they made a success of the reboot this year.

But it is not analogous to C4 *purchasing* GBBO format without the talent secured.
Ash_M1
15-09-2016
Originally Posted by Jellied Eel:
“Well, yes. But enough about Top Gear.. What do you think C4 will do with Bake Off?”

jElliED, Clarkson had to go and you like the rest of us know why. It's no good you attempting to say otherwise.

Furthermore, the events are totally different.
Xuri
15-09-2016
Originally Posted by Ash_M1:
“jElliED, Clarkson had to go and you like the rest of us know why. It's no good you attempting to say otherwise.

Furthermore, the events are totally different.”

Yep. But I do think a comparison can be made in terms of them having the format but not the "talent".

Was GBBO successful because of the format or because of the talent?
Was Top Gear successful because of the format or because of the talent?

It is a similar situation though the events leading up to it are starkly different.
Ash_M1
15-09-2016
Originally Posted by Xuri:
“Yep. But I do think a comparison can be made in terms of them having the format but not the "talent".

Was GBBO successful because of the format or because of the talent?
Was Top Gear successful because of the format or because of the talent?

It is a similar situation though the events leading up to it are starkly different.”

It's both isn't it. You need the format and you need the talent.
Xuri
15-09-2016
Originally Posted by Ash_M1:
“It's both isn't it. You need the format and you need the talent.”

Right.

And like the BBC with Top Gear. C4 have the format but not the talent.

Maybe it will be a success if they strike lucky with whomever they choose to replace the current lot. But it's a gamble in my view.
Ash_M1
15-09-2016
Originally Posted by Xuri:
“Right.

And like the BBC with Top Gear. C4 have the format but not the talent.

Maybe it will be a success if they strike lucky with whomever they choose to replace the current lot. But it's a gamble in my view.”

...but the situations were/are totally different. With one presenter, there were a whole lot of historical 'issues' climaxing in said presenter assaulting a producer. Said presenter had to go forcing the situation we now find ourselves in. The other was simply down to the greed of the producers.

Content changing channels is a huge gamble as viewers associate a particular show with a particular broadcaster/channel.
Xuri
15-09-2016
Originally Posted by Ash_M1:
“...but the situations were/are totally different. With one presenter, there were a whole lot of historical 'issues' climaxing in said presenter assaulting a producer. Said presenter had to go forcing the situation we now find ourselves in. The other was simply down to the greed of the producers.

Content changing channels is a huge gamble as viewers associate a particular show with a particular broadcaster/channel.”

You're skirting the issue again. The end result is the same. They have the format but not the talent. The same situation the BBC found itself in with Top Gear. They only have half of the successful equation. How they ended up in that situation isn't relevant to the comparison.
Ash_M1
15-09-2016
Originally Posted by Xuri:
“You're skirting the issue again. The end result is the same. They have the format but not the talent. The same situation the BBC found itself in with Top Gear. They only have half of the successful equation. How they ended up in that situation isn't relevant to the comparison.”

Well...except that Top Gear isn't changing channels/networks. A show which leaves the BBC for anywhere else becomes a totally different show.
Xuri
15-09-2016
Originally Posted by Ash_M1:
“Well...except that Top Gear isn't changing channels/networks. A show which leaves the BBC for anywhere else becomes a totally different show.”

Are you deliberately being dense?

The point is that they have the format but not the talent. That's the reason people are making the comparison. That it's on a different network is a separate, but I agree with you, equally challenging problem. But the reason for the comparison to Top Gear is that they have the format and not the talent. How are you not understanding that?
Ash_M1
15-09-2016
Originally Posted by Xuri:
“Are you deliberately being dense?

The point is that they have the format but not the talent. That's the reason people are making the comparison. That it's on a different network is a separate, but I agree with you, equally challenging problem. But the reason for the comparison to Top Gear is that they have the format and not the talent. How are you not understanding that?”

I don't particularly appreciate being referred to as 'dense'. I am a highly educated person.
eggchen
15-09-2016
Originally Posted by Ash_M1:
“Well...except that Top Gear isn't changing channels/networks. A show which leaves the BBC for anywhere else becomes a totally different show.”

The Grand Tour will be Top Gear in all but name except, according to early viewings, far, far better.
Samthefootball
15-09-2016
Originally Posted by Xuri:
“Are you deliberately being dense?

The point is that they have the format but not the talent. That's the reason people are making the comparison. That it's on a different network is a separate, but I agree with you, equally challenging problem. But the reason for the comparison to Top Gear is that they have the format and not the talent. How are you not understanding that?”

Top Gear and The Great British Bake off is entirely different. With Top Gear the ex presenters had to leave but it still stayed on BBC 1. With the Great British Bake off another Channel bid more for the rights and the talent left, if LP had stayed with the BBC then Mel/Sue and Possibly Mary/Paul would have stayed and it would have carried on like normal.

The Great British Bake off has been all but destroyed in a matter of days
Xuri
15-09-2016
Originally Posted by Samthefootball:
“Top Gear and The Great British Bake off is entirely different. With Top Gear the ex presenters had to leave but it still stayed on BBC 1. With the Great British Bake off another Channel bid more for the rights and the talent left, if LP had stayed with the BBC then Mel/Sue and Possibly Mary/Paul would have stayed and it would have carried on like normal. ”

Again. Those are the causes not the effect.

The effect is they have the format but not the talent. Which is a very similar situation which is why people are making the comparison.
A.D.P
15-09-2016
Originally Posted by mossy2103:
“However that runs contrary to C4's remit to be " innovative, experimental and distinctive". **

Buying such a programme, ratings juggernaut or not, flies in the face of all of those requirements. Thet are certainly not being innovative by buying in a proven winner. They are not being experimental by doing so. And distinctive? Well, seeing as the BBC already had the programme, they are not doing anything that is distinctive.

And it is certainly not doing this:

"champion innovation in TV, film & digital – nurturing and growing new ideas, formats, views and voices, faces, talent, audiences and production companies."


** http://www.channel4.com/info/corpora...annel-4s-remit”

Fully agree, C4 have broken their remit on this, and have brought their own privitisation a lot closer now, making them more like ITV, & 5.
Ash_M1
15-09-2016
Originally Posted by Samthefootball:
“Top Gear and The Great British Bake off is entirely different. With Top Gear the ex presenters had to leave but it still stayed on BBC 1. With the Great British Bake off another Channel bid more for the rights and the talent left, if LP had stayed with the BBC then Mel/Sue and Possibly Mary/Paul would have stayed and it would have carried on like normal.

The Great British Bake off has been all but destroyed in a matter of days”

Absolutely. What's happened to Bake Off was totally unnecessary, motivated by greed only.
Antbox
15-09-2016
Originally Posted by Ash_M1:
“Absolutely. What's happened to Bake Off was totally unnecessary, motivated by greed only.”

And nothing at all to do with how the BBC had soured the relationship with Love Productions by repeatedly ripping off their formats and antagonising them in other ways.

Right.
A.D.P
15-09-2016
Originally Posted by Antbox:
“And nothing at all to do with how the BBC had soured the relationship with Love Productions by repeatedly ripping off their formats and antagonising them in other ways.

Right.”

Do you want to just read the tabloids and try to accept Love Productions poor defence.

And GBBO is Masterchef in a tent, another rip off?

Simon Cowell ripped off Pop Idol and Opportunity knocks.

Did Love Productions " copyright " - all their so called ideas.

So Love Productions have all " hobbies" on exclusive contracts like paintings?
Jellied Eel
15-09-2016
Originally Posted by madmusician:
“BBC didn't buy the Top Gear format without the presenters. The BBC bought the format, but before thinking of an adequate post-CHM strategy, Clarkson's role as a BBC employee become untenable.”

Yup. Clarkson & Co's contracts were up for renewal not long after flogging Bedder 6 to the Bbc. The stars popped over to Amazon for some dosh leaving Aunty with an empty tent.. I mean hanger. This time, the vehicle's run away from the Bbc leaving the star's contracts up for renewal. C4 can potentially start off their run with a freshly baked team.
Jellied Eel
15-09-2016
Originally Posted by Ash_M1:
“jElliED,”

How sweet.. However, unlike the Bbc.. I can write NATO and NASA correctly..

Quote:
“It's no good you attempting to say otherwise.”

Both were top shows. Both lost their presenters. One failed miserably in it's new, improved version. Will C4's do the same? If it doesn't, what might that say about the abilities of the producers?
Antbox
15-09-2016
Originally Posted by A.D.P:
“And GBBO is Masterchef in a tent, another rip off?”

Masterchef is a quite different format. (And the revamped Masterchef is different again, and, what is more, is another format which the BBC does not own.)

If Masterchef and GBBO are the same, why did the BBC pay Love Productions for GBBO? Why would they waste licence fee payer's money on something which they already had the rights to, if they are, as you wrongly claim, the same thing?

Originally Posted by A.D.P:
“Did Love Productions " copyright " - all their so called ideas.”

Ideas and works are automatically copyrighted, and yes, they own the rights to their original creative intellectual property. That's why the GBBO format is sold around the world (by BBC Worldwide no less) - it is a marketable, valuable, distinct and legally protected format.

Originally Posted by A.D.P:
“So Love Productions have all " hobbies" on exclusive contracts like paintings?”

No, because the copyright is not "a show about hobbies" but in all the key elements which make a format legally distinct and protectable. The challenges, the process and method of eliminations, etc.

Remember, if someone copied a BBC format, they'd be the first at the door with their lawyers. All companies are entitled to the protection of copyright, not just your favourites.
<<
<
24 of 89
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map