• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Broadcasting
BBC Loses Great British Bakeoff
<<
<
77 of 89
>>
>
Mark.
30-10-2016
Originally Posted by ftv:
“Jay Hunt's statement that it will be ''exactly the same'' as the BBC original is clearly untrue.”

She never actually said that, though.
pedrok
30-10-2016
Originally Posted by Mark.:
“That doesn't alter the format..”

It will make it a different programme, and I was pointing out what the difference will be between BBC and C4.
jonbwfc
30-10-2016
Originally Posted by Mark.:
“Not necessarily. You, like everyone before you, is guessing..”

Yes, I'm guessing based on every single television programme that's been broadcast on commercial television in the UK since the 1950's.

I mean, I admit, it's a bit of a reach, but there you go.
Mark.
30-10-2016
Originally Posted by pedrok:
“It will make it a different programme, and I was pointing out what the difference will be between BBC and C4.”

It won't alter the format, though.

Originally Posted by jonbwfc:
“Yes, I'm guessing based on every single television programme that's been broadcast on commercial television in the UK since the 1950's.

I mean, I admit, it's a bit of a reach, but there you go.”

You're guessing because you have absolutely no idea what Channel 4's plans are in terms of the time slot.
Aaron_2015
30-10-2016
Originally Posted by jonbwfc:
“Yes, I'm guessing based on every single television programme that's been broadcast on commercial television in the UK since the 1950's.

I mean, I admit, it's a bit of a reach, but there you go.”

You are still not automatically correct. The running time might still be 58 minutes as it is now. Now obviously there will be less of the actual program, but the running time could remain the same.

At the end of the day - we don't know. Nothing has been confirmed by Channel Four. So far we have one judge down, and a format we all know. That's all we know so far.
Mark.
30-10-2016
Originally Posted by Aaron_2015:
“At the end of the day - we don't know. Nothing has been confirmed by Channel Four. So far we have one judge down, and a format we all know. That's all we know so far.”

Which is the point I've been making.

But people will continue to make stuff up, then use that to attack Channel 4.

I also still think it's ridiculous how people who claim to be fans of the show have already decided not to at least give it a chance when it moves.
lundavra
30-10-2016
Originally Posted by Aaron_2015:
“As a fan, the location makes no difference to me. At the moment, we see a tent in a nice field, with the occasional shot of a country house. That could be any country house as far as I'm concerned.

Hasn't it already been said the show could run for 75 minutes to accommodate adverts? There has been no mention of the format changing.”

So rather than ten or fifteen minutes of adverts on an hour programme there would then be twenty five minutes of adverts at least.
mossy2103
30-10-2016
Originally Posted by Aaron_2015:
“As a fan, the location makes no difference to me. At the moment, we see a tent in a nice field, with the occasional shot of a country house. That could be any country house as far as I'm concerned.”

I am sure that the country house location has changed once before.

Quote:
“Hasn't it already been said the show could run for 75 minutes to accommodate adverts? There has been no mention of the format changing.”

That has been the subject of speculation, to my knowledge there has been no firm indication from anyone at C4 that this might or would be the case.
A.D.P
30-10-2016
Originally Posted by Mark.:
“Which is the point I've been making.

But people will continue to make stuff up, then use that to attack Channel 4.

I also still think it's ridiculous how people who claim to be fans of the show have already decided not to at least give it a chance when it moves.”

No it's not ridiculous.

I like the team.
I like Mel, I like Sue, neither will be there.
I like Mary, she isn't there.
I prefer not to have adverts or sponsorship.
Yes I like Paul but on his own with new presenters it's not the same show.

Better have found memories than have them ruined. Like a favourite resort to go on holiday, when you know they will put up, big commercial developments, you move on, and have good memories.

GBBO as a show is dead, yes the name lives on, that's it, a name, it will be very very different.
A.D.P
30-10-2016
Originally Posted by mossy2103:
“I am sure that the country house location has changed once before.

That has been the subject of speculation, to my knowledge there has been no firm indication from anyone at C4 that this might or would be the case.”

Agree, you are an experienced voice of reason, some people just make things up.
Aaron_2015
30-10-2016
Originally Posted by A.D.P:
“Agree, you are an experienced voice of reason, some people just make things up.”

Who is that snide comment aimed at?
mossy2103
30-10-2016
Originally Posted by Mark.:
“She never actually said that, though.”

You can play semantics here, but this is what she wrote in a piece for the Telegraph:

Quote:
“But more than that, the Great British Bake Off will have a safe home. The show of soggy bottoms and good crumb will be made by exactly the same team who have always made it. We love it just as it is. And for an amateur baker like me, that’s a real cause for celebration.”

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016...tish-bake-off/
lundavra
30-10-2016
Originally Posted by ftv:
“Jay Hunt's statement that it will be ''exactly the same'' as the BBC original is clearly untrue.”

Originally Posted by Mark.:
“She never actually said that, though.”

Nearly the same

Quote:
“Channel 4’s programmes boss Jay Hunt has made a public defence of her acquisition of The Great British Bake Off assuring fans that the show will stay “just as it is”.”

There are numerous direct quotes and one piece written by her, with "just as it is".
Mark.
30-10-2016
Originally Posted by mossy2103:
“You can play semantics here, but this is what she wrote in a piece for the Telegraph:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016...tish-bake-off/”

It's not playing semantics - she did not say the show would be exactly the same.

She said it would be made by the same people and that "[they] love it just as it is". That suggests that as far as possible it will be the same, but it's not a commitment to being absolutely identical.
pedrok
30-10-2016
Originally Posted by Mark.:
“It won't alter the format, though.”

I never claimed it would.
Steve9214
30-10-2016
Originally Posted by Mark.:
“It won't alter the format, though.

You're guessing because you have absolutely no idea what Channel 4's plans are in terms of the time slot.”

Having advertising breaks will have an impact on the pacing of the show.

Many years ago there was a review in the London Evening Standard of a new one hour ITV drama which was glowing and gushing about how great it was, and what a rip-roaring storyline it had etc.

Next day, after the TV broadcast, the same critic apologised to readers who may have watched the show based on his review.
He had written his review based on watching a special showing in advance, in a screening cinema, where it had no advertising breaks.
He said the breaks ruined the tension and the pacing of the drama, and it was not the same show he had watched without breaks.

IIRC Mark Little said the same of Neighbours when it was on the BBC.
Nobody in Australia could understand the appeal of Neighbours in the UK, but when shown with no ad breaks it became a different show completely.

With the BBC Bake Off, nobody watching gets up to make a cup of tea or pop to the loo in the middle of the baking for the showstopper.
A 3 minute break in the middle of the mad scramble to finish making the final products will make it a different show, like it or not
Mark.
30-10-2016
Originally Posted by pedrok:
“I never claimed it would.”

I never said you did.
pedrok
30-10-2016
Originally Posted by Mark.:
“I never said you did.”

No, but you did reply to me that it won't change the format, when I have never mentioned the format at any time.

I am simply making it clear, as it seems everyone has to be particularly clear in what they post, that I have never mentioned the format.
Mark.
30-10-2016
Originally Posted by pedrok:
“No, but you did reply to me that it won't change the format, when I have never mentioned the format at any time.”

You twice quoted posts of mine where I discussed the format. It's therefore not exactly unreasonable to think that you too were talking about the format.
pedrok
30-10-2016
Originally Posted by Mark.:
“You twice quoted posts of mine where I discussed the format. It's therefore not exactly unreasonable to think that you too were talking about the format.”

And yet I never used the word format at any time, and did use the word different!!!!
Mark.
30-10-2016
Originally Posted by pedrok:
“And yet I never used the word format at any time, and did use the word different!!!!”

It doesn't matter - you quoted two posts of mine where I made reference to the format. It's therefore not unreasonable to assume that you too were referring to the format.

If you weren't, then why quote my posts?
pedrok
30-10-2016
Originally Posted by Mark.:
“It doesn't matter - you quoted two posts of mine where I made reference to the format. It's therefore not unreasonable to assume that you too were referring to the format.

If you weren't, then why quote my posts?”

The first post of yours I quoted i spoke only of differences. I mentioned that adverts would make a difference.

The second post of yours I quoted, I only quoted the specific part where you mention the word format. I pointed that I was only speaking of what would be different.

You then used the word format again in another post I quoted. I pointed out that I never claimed otherwise.

Now, we can go on like this for as long as you wish, it's up to you.
Mark.
30-10-2016
Originally Posted by pedrok:
“Now, we can go on like this for as long as you wish, it's up to you.”

I've got better things to do with my time. We'll just agree that you're wrong and move on.
pedrok
30-10-2016
Originally Posted by Mark.:
“I've got better things to do with my time. We'll just agree that you're wrong and move on.”

Hahaha. Yes, that's what I would expect from you.

Now if you can point out anywhere in my original reply to your post 1883 where I used the word format, I will admit I am wrong. To help you my post is 1885 and contains 10 words.

So you fire in and find where I use the word format in that post.

And if you cannot find the word format in post 1885, you are going to look very silly.
Mark.
30-10-2016
You quoted a post where I was specifically discussing the format. Whether or not you explicitly mentioned the format is irrelevant - it's not unreasonable to expect your post to also be referring to the format.

It really is as simple as that.

You're wrong. Let it go and move on instead of continuing to drag the thread off-topic.
<<
<
77 of 89
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map