|
||||||||
EE Jane - is she the next to be axed? |
![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 7,261
|
EE Jane - is she the next to be axed?
SOC is getting rid of all EE's morally bankrupt characters, Jane surely will be next.
You can't have so many killers or people responsible for murder living in one square. Thoughts? |
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: With MyAndy!
Posts: 15,202
|
Quote:
SOC is getting rid of all EE's morally bankrupt characters, Jane surely will be next.
You can't have so many killers or people responsible for murder living in one square. Thoughts? People keep going on saying Sock likes characters to be punished but the end result of his domestic abuse story was that Rob lived and Helen was found not guilty |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 31,001
|
Jane and Babe should certainly be on his hit list.
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: London
Posts: 26,708
|
Donna will be the next one announced, followed by Tina, Vincent & Shakil.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 7,261
|
I've heard about this s/l on the Archers.
What purpose does she serve? Her sentence is in the Beale household. I think I would have rather seen her serving a sentence for conspiracy etc |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: With MyAndy!
Posts: 15,202
|
Quote:
Donna will be the next one announced, followed by Tina, Vincent & Shakil.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 7,261
|
Quote:
Jane and Babe should certainly be on his hit list.
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 7,261
|
Quote:
Donna will be the next one announced, followed by Tina, Vincent & Shakil.
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Plymouth Devon
Posts: 12,497
|
Cant see Jane being Axed
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: London
Posts: 9,412
|
I think either Kathy or Jane will be axed, but not both because it would leave the Beales in limbo.
Kathy is at risk because her return, sadly, hasn't worked out. Jane because, well where do I begin? |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 11,622
|
As much as I'm against too many axings, I think SOC is doing well by sorting out the amorality in the square by getting rid of Claudette and Ronnie. I'd like to see Jane and Babe go as well. These are all characters that have done horrible things, and while you expect a certain amount of villainy in soaps, the issue is that they're all dragging down other characters by association. In the case of Jane, she's not just doing that, we're also expected to see her as some wise and guiltless voice of reason. It just doesn't work for me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 7,261
|
Quote:
As much as I'm against too many axings, I think SOC is doing well by sorting out the amorality in the square by getting rid of Claudette and Ronnie. I'd like to see Jane and Babe go as well. These are all characters that have done horrible things, and while you expect a certain amount of villainy in soaps, the issue is that they're all dragging down other characters by association. In the case of Jane, she's not just doing that, we're also expected to see her as some wise and guiltless voice of reason. It just doesn't work for me.
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 750
|
How could they axe Jane without killing her.... She would never leave Bobby after everything ..... It would undo the whole Lucy storyline
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 7,261
|
Quote:
I think either Kathy or Jane will be axed, but not both because it would leave the Beales in limbo.
Kathy is at risk because he return sadly hasn't worked out. Jane because, well where do I begin? |
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 7,261
|
Quote:
How could they axe Jane without killing her.... She would never leave Bobby after everything ..... It would undo the whole Lucy storyline
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: London
Posts: 9,412
|
Quote:
As much as I'm against too many axings, I think SOC is doing well by sorting out the amorality in the square by getting rid of Claudette and Ronnie. I'd like to see Jane and Babe go as well. These are all characters that have done horrible things, and while you expect a certain amount of villainy in soaps, the issue is that they're all dragging down other characters by association. In the case of Jane, she's not just doing that, we're also expected to see her as some wise and guiltless voice of reason. It just doesn't work for me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Winter is coming.
Posts: 13,324
|
Imprison the sociopath. J-B and I have said it all along - she needs to be taken into custody, and sentenced to a lengthy and brutal sentence.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: With MyAndy!
Posts: 15,202
|
Quote:
If you axe Jane then Kathy can step up
dead kathy is incapable of stepping up, the actress lacks the skills, give me mcbeale and her shady sly ways anyday |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: With MyAndy!
Posts: 15,202
|
Quote:
Imprison the sociopath. J-B and I have said it all along - she needs to be taken into custody, and sentenced to a lengthy and brutal sentence.
![]() ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 750
|
Quote:
Imprison the sociopath. J-B and I have said it all along - she needs to be taken into custody, and sentenced to a lengthy and brutal sentence.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Winter is coming.
Posts: 13,324
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Earth
Posts: 6,319
|
Oh please make it so
Fed up with looking at her feel sorry herself face KARMA jane karma....she didn't feel too sorry for Lucy did she when she was lugging her into the boot of her car and dumping her on the cold wet common on her own ....... And yes I know it's a tv show |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 10,716
|
I used to love Jane but there's no way back for her. On one hand I hate this massive cast clear out but, on the other, the writing and character development has been so bad over the last couple of years that it's inevitable.
I'd have kept the Cokers, Lee and Roxy - the rest need to go. |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: North of England
Posts: 14,124
|
I'd love to see Laurie Brett take up new roles, as she's a good actress.
Much as she's been Ian's most stable marriage, Jane has done everything possible and I wouldn't be too sad if she left. The character took a major hit by covering up Lucy's murder, protecting that devil child Bobby and letting Max go to prison for a while. The Beales themselves just don't seem to be doing much for me these days. Perhaps killing off Lucy was a mistake in hindsight. I thought Hetti Bywater's acting had improved a lot and she could've been a really important younger character on the show now. |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 750
|
Quote:
I'd love to see Laurie Brett take up new roles, as she's a good actress.
Much as she's been Ian's most stable marriage, Jane has done everything possible and I wouldn't be too sad if she left. The character took a major hit by covering up Lucy's murder, protecting that devil child Bobby and letting Max go to prison for a while. The Beales themselves just don't seem to be doing much for me these days. Perhaps killing off Lucy was a mistake in hindsight. I thought Hetti Bywater's acting had improved a lot and she could've been a really important younger character on the show now. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 12:56.




