• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Soaps
Eastenders inability to create 3 dimensional characters
soap-lea
14-09-2016
Iv been thinking of doing this thread for a week or two, but thought it was apt given the latest axe.

Eastenders seem to be incapable of developing and introducing fully rounded, layered characters.



Johnny Carter v1 - he had his coming out story and was a bit wet behind the ears and left his leaving led to his ben storyline having to be given to someone else lets all welcome Paul Coker to the show.

Poorly characterised, he interacted with Ben and the cokers only for a lot of his stint. they didnt give him any personality at all, his hair and eyebrows had loads. there was storyline potential there and untapped, his diabetes, his mum, how he felt about his gran murdering his dad etc etc but we got none of that!

Kyle, great potential comes in as Staceys brother mid phychotic episode. returns and we learn of his transgender, he likes to cook and the rest of his family don't want to know. since then absolutely nothing. he has no personality whatsoever, has formed no friendships other than andy (in a weird way), most of his scenes are just in the background or there just for either stacey or Belinda to talk at.

such wasted potential!

Johnny v2.0, other than to resume his ben storyline, I fail to see why he was brought back? this attempt has a slightly different personality but again no integration to the rest of the square.

Donna, screeching awful mouth woman when she came in, nothing else about her. 2 years later they give her the baby storyline that was bordering on sick! that failed and so she has gone back to being a background character

Dead Kathy. No words just pointless and not believable

personally I hope this is a problem that can be fixed.

do you agree? find it an issue? disagree
The Grimes
14-09-2016
I think it was a Dominic Treadwell - Collins thing and his direction towards the writers,
Hopefully Sean O'Connor will direct them a bit better,

We have lost too many decent actors and potentially good characters over the last few years.
Bertypop
14-09-2016
The fact that there seems to be a bit of a clear-out going on might mean we get a bit more focus on the characters that we do have. I'm hoping that we don't get a massive influx of new ones now, but I think the show works better when it's a smaller cast with around 20 people in each episode.

We're getting nigh on 30 each episode which is why there's no room to develop characters.
soap-lea
14-09-2016
Originally Posted by Bertypop:
“The fact that there seems to be a bit of a clear-out going on might mean we get a bit more focus on the characters that we do have. I'm hoping that we don't get a massive influx of new ones now, but I think the show works better when it's a smaller cast with around 20 people in each episode.

We're getting nigh on 30 each episode which is why there's no room to develop characters.”


we don't get 30 characters in each ep

DTC was a fan of ten -12 characters per episode if that!
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map