DS Forums

 
 

Is Cheryl Cole pregnant with Liam Paynes child?


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 26-10-2016, 03:14
Zarla
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 1,886
Most pregnancies dont get confirmed until around 3 months after first scan,I doubt very much she is pregnant, too soon in the relationship,they are just letting the media hang themselves.An official announcement would have come by now.
The picture at this link is absolutely definitive proof (and I hate conspiracy theories).

They've been together since December 2015 and she looks to be about 6-7 months pregnant in this picture.

http://i3.mirror.co.uk/incoming/arti...ummer-2017.jpg
Zarla is offline   Reply With Quote
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 26-10-2016, 10:57
Frankie_Little
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Summerseat
Posts: 7,311
Cheryl and Liam are under no obligation to tell anyone about the pregnancy, and after witnessing the hateful comments directed at the mother of Louis's son, both during her pregnancy and afterwards (and ongoing, as the more batshit crazy fans still think the little boy is a hired hand ), I'm not surprised they aren't confirming anything.
Frankie_Little is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-10-2016, 11:30
Harry Redknapp
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: hiding from the taxman
Posts: 4,126
Another reminder: Liam is the dumbest.
Harry Redknapp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-10-2016, 11:38
Goaty
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 3,378
What if she never pregnant? All it was by the media.
Goaty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-10-2016, 11:53
Frankie_Little
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Summerseat
Posts: 7,311
What if she never pregnant? All it was by the media.
What about the photo that Zarla posted in #301? For a woman who has never been overweight in her life, to suddenly develop a big belly and boobs to match, it doesn't make sense. She's having a baby. Or she has something pretty drastic wrong with her insides.
Frankie_Little is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-10-2016, 11:55
Frankie_Little
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Summerseat
Posts: 7,311
Another reminder: Liam is the dumbest.
Oh yeah, poor old Liam doesn't have both oars in the water, never has. He's still a multi-millionaire though.
Frankie_Little is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-10-2016, 22:48
Little Star
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 648
The picture at this link is absolutely definitive proof (and I hate conspiracy theories).

They've been together since December 2015 and she looks to be about 6-7 months pregnant in this picture.

http://i3.mirror.co.uk/incoming/arti...ummer-2017.jpg
Yes that photo is conclusive. The outfit she wore that night probably made her bump look smaller than it is, with the incoming cut of the shawl, and the sheer illusion top part coming half way down. When she was posing to the front you'd barely have noticed it, but that photo shows she is quite far on. I would say seven months there, so probably close to eight by now.

That would fit with her being 2 to 3 months in the pink dress photo, which started the original speculation back in May.
Little Star is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-10-2016, 12:15
munkyfellover
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Fairfax, Virginia
Posts: 1,384
The picture at this link is absolutely definitive proof (and I hate conspiracy theories).

They've been together since December 2015 and she looks to be about 6-7 months pregnant in this picture.

http://i3.mirror.co.uk/incoming/arti...ummer-2017.jpg
That has to be a Photoshop job.
munkyfellover is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-10-2016, 13:43
DiamondDoll
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 13,996
That has to be a Photoshop job.
I agree.

His jacket wouldn't have been pushed back like that in reality.
DiamondDoll is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-10-2016, 15:54
Tanzie
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 1,245
That has to be a Photoshop job.
I agree.

His jacket wouldn't have been pushed back like that in reality.

Yeah, I think so too. There's something odd looking about his trousers just under the "bump".
Tanzie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-10-2016, 16:46
Blondie X
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Kent but ex Sarf London
Posts: 26,528
Theres a new photo of her today where she doesn't look pregnant at all which adds to the confusion over this one

https://www.thesun.co.uk/tvandshowbi...ans-in-london/
Blondie X is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-10-2016, 16:59
Goaty
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 3,378
That has to be a Photoshop job.
It is.
Goaty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-10-2016, 17:20
BinCat
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,019
Are they actually a couple then? I thought it was just a PR stunt tbh.
BinCat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-10-2016, 17:32
munkyfellover
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Fairfax, Virginia
Posts: 1,384
Are they actually a couple then? I thought it was just a PR stunt tbh.
For whose gain?
munkyfellover is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-10-2016, 18:18
Frankie_Little
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Summerseat
Posts: 7,311
That has to be a Photoshop job.
http://img.thesun.co.uk/aidemitlum/a...e_2996698a.jpg

There's another pic of her at the same event from a different angle - is this one photoshopped too?

She definitely doesn't look pregnant in the most recent photos, so I concur it is a fauxmance for publicity and Baby Payno doesn't exist. Probably. Still doesn't mean Chezza is a lezza though.
Frankie_Little is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-10-2016, 18:54
BinCat
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,019
Probably Cheryl's, she seems to be flagging in popularity these days, and they just seem like a very unlikely couple to me.
BinCat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-10-2016, 19:19
munkyfellover
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Fairfax, Virginia
Posts: 1,384
http://img.thesun.co.uk/aidemitlum/a...e_2996698a.jpg

There's another pic of her at the same event from a different angle - is this one photoshopped too?

She definitely doesn't look pregnant in the most recent photos, so I concur it is a fauxmance for publicity and Baby Payno doesn't exist. Probably. Still doesn't mean Chezza is a lezza though.
That is VASTLY different to the other picture.
munkyfellover is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-10-2016, 19:19
munkyfellover
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Fairfax, Virginia
Posts: 1,384
Probably Cheryl's, she seems to be flagging in popularity these days, and they just seem like a very unlikely couple to me.
How fits that tin foil hat?
munkyfellover is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-10-2016, 21:04
BinCat
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,019
How fits that tin foil hat?
Lol, sorry if I offended a fan, don't actually care, and it's not important, she's not exactly relevant anymore, and his band are finishing, just assumed it was for publicity, like Taylor Swift with all her "new" blokes.
BinCat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-10-2016, 21:53
duffsdad
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 9,835
Theres a new photo of her today where she doesn't look pregnant at all which adds to the confusion over this one

https://www.thesun.co.uk/tvandshowbi...ans-in-london/
In some of the stills from that event her waist is tiny.
duffsdad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-10-2016, 22:20
munkyfellover
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Fairfax, Virginia
Posts: 1,384
Lol, sorry if I offended a fan, don't actually care, and it's not important, she's not exactly relevant anymore, and his band are finishing, just assumed it was for publicity, like Taylor Swift with all her "new" blokes.
A fan?
munkyfellover is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-10-2016, 22:37
daisy_johns
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 295
She has got a bit of a bump, but, can't that happen to people with an eating disorder who start to eat more? I have a friend and it happened to her for a while.
daisy_johns is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-10-2016, 23:43
Billy_Value
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 18,873
she ain't got the fat legs, face and arms of a pregnant person yet
Billy_Value is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-10-2016, 23:58
DiamondDoll
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 13,996
she ain't got the fat legs, face and arms of a pregnant person yet
My daughter debunks your theory as she had no fat deposits in the places you mention. *yawn*
DiamondDoll is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28-10-2016, 00:02
Zarla
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 1,886
That has to be a Photoshop job.
Absolutely not, it's from the Daily Mirror, not a Tumblr blog. They don't photoshop pictures or buy from those who do. Seriously, Cheryl could sue them for millions if they posted a picture which was altered to make her look seven months pregnant when she wasn't.

She still looks pregnant in today's pictures, in which she's wearing a blousy top with a belt tied loosely around her waist. There are no pics from the side though.

We need to remember that this isn't a yoyo dieter like Lauren Goodger or Charlotte Crosby. Cheryl has never gone from a size 6-16 and back again. She's maybe gone from a size 2 to a size 6 at the most and she's never had anything but a rock hard belly. That's why the picture in the pink dress in May stood out - her stomach had a convex curve for the first time ever.
Zarla is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply




 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 20:03.