The picture at this link is absolutely definitive proof (and I hate conspiracy theories).

They've been together since December 2015 and she looks to be about 6-7 months pregnant in this picture.

http://i3.mirror.co.uk/incoming/arti...ummer-2017.jpg

Cheryl and Liam are under no obligation to tell anyone about the pregnancy, and after witnessing the hateful comments directed at the mother of Louis's son, both during her pregnancy and afterwards (and ongoing, as the more batshit crazy fans still think the little boy is a hired hand ), I'm not surprised they aren't confirming anything.

Another reminder: Liam is the dumbest.

What if she never pregnant? All it was by the media.

What about the photo that Zarla posted in #301? For a woman who has never been overweight in her life, to suddenly develop a big belly and boobs to match, it doesn't make sense. She's having a baby. Or she has something pretty drastic wrong with her insides.

Oh yeah, poor old Liam doesn't have both oars in the water, never has. He's still a multi-millionaire though.

Yes that photo is conclusive. The outfit she wore that night probably made her bump look smaller than it is, with the incoming cut of the shawl, and the sheer illusion top part coming half way down. When she was posing to the front you'd barely have noticed it, but that photo shows she is quite far on. I would say seven months there, so probably close to eight by now.

That would fit with her being 2 to 3 months in the pink dress photo, which started the original speculation back in May.

That has to be a Photoshop job.

I agree.

His jacket wouldn't have been pushed back like that in reality.

Yeah, I think so too. There's something odd looking about his trousers just under the "bump".

Theres a new photo of her today where she doesn't look pregnant at all which adds to the confusion over this one

https://www.thesun.co.uk/tvandshowbi...ans-in-london/

It is.

Are they actually a couple then? I thought it was just a PR stunt tbh.

For whose gain?

http://img.thesun.co.uk/aidemitlum/a...e_2996698a.jpg

There's another pic of her at the same event from a different angle - is this one photoshopped too?

She definitely doesn't look pregnant in the most recent photos, so I concur it is a fauxmance for publicity and Baby Payno doesn't exist. Probably. Still doesn't mean Chezza is a lezza though.

Probably Cheryl's, she seems to be flagging in popularity these days, and they just seem like a very unlikely couple to me.

That is VASTLY different to the other picture.

How fits that tin foil hat?

Lol, sorry if I offended a fan, don't actually care, and it's not important, she's not exactly relevant anymore, and his band are finishing, just assumed it was for publicity, like Taylor Swift with all her "new" blokes.

In some of the stills from that event her waist is tiny.

A fan?

She has got a bit of a bump, but, can't that happen to people with an eating disorder who start to eat more? I have a friend and it happened to her for a while.

she ain't got the fat legs, face and arms of a pregnant person yet

My daughter debunks your theory as she had no fat deposits in the places you mention. *yawn*

Absolutely not, it's from the Daily Mirror, not a Tumblr blog. They don't photoshop pictures or buy from those who do. Seriously, Cheryl could sue them for millions if they posted a picture which was altered to make her look seven months pregnant when she wasn't.

She still looks pregnant in today's pictures, in which she's wearing a blousy top with a belt tied loosely around her waist. There are no pics from the side though.

We need to remember that this isn't a yoyo dieter like Lauren Goodger or Charlotte Crosby. Cheryl has never gone from a size 6-16 and back again. She's maybe gone from a size 2 to a size 6 at the most and she's never had anything but a rock hard belly. That's why the picture in the pink dress in May stood out - her stomach had a convex curve for the first time ever.