|
||||||||
EE Kyle Slater?? |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 710
|
EE Kyle Slater??
why just why was he introduced? bloody awful and pointless character who was bound to be fail from the start, just read aunt babe is leaving as well, this is one hell of a clear out
![]() SOC obviously didnt think much of dtc's work and tbf neither did i. |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: With MyAndy!
Posts: 15,202
|
Quote:
why just why was he introduced? bloody awful and pointless character who was bound to be fail from the start, just read aunt babe is leaving as well, this is one hell of a clear out
![]() SOC obviously didnt think much of dtc's work and tbf neither did i. Appalling way to treat both the actor and the character. Personally, I think they should have taken their time, found the right person and worked on creating a decent character before they hit the screen then built on it. I don't think Riley was a very good actor so I am glad he hasn't been used too much but EE gave him the job and should have taken the time to build his character and hope that with experience he got better. Unfortunately they couldn't even be bothered to do that. When you compare Hollyoaks introduction of Sally which was around the same time, you can see the vast vast difference between the acting abilities of the actors and also how well hollyoaks have created the character of Sally. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 11,622
|
Quote:
Purely because the EP at the time spoke at a LGBT event and decided he was introducing a trans character. That appears to have been where the thought stopped!
Appalling way to treat both the actor and the character. Personally, I think they should have taken their time, found the right person and worked on creating a decent character before they hit the screen then built on it. I don't think Riley was a very good actor so I am glad he hasn't been used too much but EE gave him the job and should have taken the time to build his character and hope that with experience he got better. Unfortunately they couldn't even be bothered to do that. When you compare Hollyoaks introduction of Sally which was around the same time, you can see the vast vast difference between the acting abilities of the actors and also how well hollyoaks have created the character of Sally. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: With MyAndy!
Posts: 15,202
|
Quote:
Perfect post. It's absolutely disgusting the way they've failed such an important issue which they were all too happy to publicise and self-congratulate themselves on when he was first cast.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Plymouth Devon
Posts: 12,497
|
I thinking he has been very underused
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 12:56.


