Originally Posted by GDK:
“Granted I don't know the numbers (but if they are only rumours then I assume you don't either), but if you're right (meaning the numbers are extreme) LG's shareholders should sell immediately and cut their losses. LG should have already gone bust. That they haven't suggests to me that your assertion (and without numbers it's just an assertion, an opinion) is incorrect.
Not every new tech that companies introduce succeeds of course, many fail, but you seem to be overly pessimistic.
At the end of the day if a consumer gets a TV that has lasts 10 years, that's pretty good. Of course, in that sort of timescale, others will bring to market newer, better, cheaper technologies, but it doesn't make the original choice of the consumer wrong.
People have been enjoying their plasma TVs for many years while others put up with LCD, even though plasma is now an obsolete technology that's no longer available. When the time comes to replace they will choose from what's available then.
LG's development costs is a risk that (might) only affect the future of LG itself. Not so much the consumer.
It's not comparable to, say, Betamax or Minidisc or SACD or DVD Audio where you might have built up a collection of recordings that can't be replaced and nothing to play them on.”
“Granted I don't know the numbers (but if they are only rumours then I assume you don't either), but if you're right (meaning the numbers are extreme) LG's shareholders should sell immediately and cut their losses. LG should have already gone bust. That they haven't suggests to me that your assertion (and without numbers it's just an assertion, an opinion) is incorrect.
Not every new tech that companies introduce succeeds of course, many fail, but you seem to be overly pessimistic.
At the end of the day if a consumer gets a TV that has lasts 10 years, that's pretty good. Of course, in that sort of timescale, others will bring to market newer, better, cheaper technologies, but it doesn't make the original choice of the consumer wrong.
People have been enjoying their plasma TVs for many years while others put up with LCD, even though plasma is now an obsolete technology that's no longer available. When the time comes to replace they will choose from what's available then.
LG's development costs is a risk that (might) only affect the future of LG itself. Not so much the consumer.
It's not comparable to, say, Betamax or Minidisc or SACD or DVD Audio where you might have built up a collection of recordings that can't be replaced and nothing to play them on.”
I loved my Minidisc player



