• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Soaps
EE should Stacey have another baby
<<
<
2 of 2
>>
>
trevor tiger
25-09-2016
Originally Posted by SteveOwen:
“There was really no need to make Kush Arthur's dad. Shabnam could've left him just based on his cheating on her with Stacey, it didn't need to be because of the baby. It cheapened Martin and Stacey's relationship and made Stacey look like an awful person, deceiving everyone for months. I also didn't like how she was immediately let off the hook for her lies just because of her breakdown. And Kush has nothing to do with Arthur anyway, which makes the whole story feel extra pointless.

It reminds me of when they made Tommy Michael Moon's son. That was also completely unnecessary.”

Kush didn't cheat They were on a break weren't they? Stacey was awful though being all best mates with Shabnam and always pushing for them to be together. Mind Stacey is a horrible person so that was in character.

Kush and Shabnam should have stayed together and be having their own child now. Stacey can't have another child unless she sorts out her meds and agrees to keep taking them. It's not fair the way she gambles with her mental health and the welfare of her children.
londongirlGre
25-09-2016
Originally Posted by trevor tiger:
“Kush didn't cheat They were on a break weren't they? Stacey was awful though being all best mates with Shabnam and always pushing for them to be together. Mind Stacey is a horrible person so that was in character.

Kush and Shabnam should have stayed together and be having their own child now. Stacey can't have another child unless she sorts out her meds and agrees to keep taking them. It's not fair the way she gambles with her mental health and the welfare of her children.”

No, Kush didn't cheat.

It would have be nice to see Shabnam and Kush raising a child. Although, I think that I prefer Kush with Denise,even though they just a had a fling. They seemed more at ease with each other.
ClassicGarfield
26-09-2016
Personally no. Stacey is not an incubator for the Fowler line. I now want a focus on her character that doesn't involve another pregnancy.

I don't even think she should have had a second baby. But she did thanks to nutty DTC and having said all that... it should have been Martin's. Because two is more than enough for Stacey; three is overkill. And the 2nd being Kushs serves no purpose. So it should have been martin's as they seem like a longer term couple and it would have been better. Kushs could be on his way out in the next 0-4 years - where Martin seems to be staying long term I think.
Drew_Hatch
26-09-2016
I'd rather we get back to firecracker Stacey and not have her go back into another baby story.

I'd be happier if they'd just pull out the old soap cliche of Arthur getting sick and discovering his blood type couldn't possibly make him Kush's son afterall.
Adrian_Ward1
26-09-2016
Originally Posted by Drew_Hatch:
“I'd rather we get back to firecracker Stacey and not have her go back into another baby story.

I'd be happier if they'd just pull out the old soap cliche of Arthur getting sick and discovering his blood type couldn't possibly make him Kush's son afterall.”


Would be brilliant
Plucky_Octopus
26-09-2016
Originally Posted by Drew_Hatch:
“I'd rather we get back to firecracker Stacey and not have her go back into another baby story.

I'd be happier if they'd just pull out the old soap cliche of Arthur getting sick and discovering his blood type couldn't possibly make him Kush's son afterall.”

Agreed, one of the rare times that a retcon would be an improvement.
IanMandy
26-09-2016
I think it would be great idea but the dates didn't match did they on the scan, how would totb explain that one
<<
<
2 of 2
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map