Originally Posted by Fudd:
“One of those things; whatever they do would be slightly unfair but giving everyone another bite of the cherry is the fairest way forward.”
“One of those things; whatever they do would be slightly unfair but giving everyone another bite of the cherry is the fairest way forward.”
Anything they did would arguably be unfair to someone. Why go for an option that is definitely unfair on everyone? What you propose would be unnecessarily complicated and penalise all the couples for no reason.
Originally Posted by Fudd:
“Either same as The X Factor where bottom place goes then the next two perform for survival - as long as this is explained BEFORE the show then it's fairer then suddenly ditching someone without a Dance Off on the night iself - or havea three way Dance Off where the judges vote to save one couple.”
“Either same as The X Factor where bottom place goes then the next two perform for survival - as long as this is explained BEFORE the show then it's fairer then suddenly ditching someone without a Dance Off on the night iself - or havea three way Dance Off where the judges vote to save one couple.”
Someone, somewhere, is going to be denied a dance-off as a result of this where they would otherwise have got one. It is better that it is done now and we lose an unpopular also-ran than do it later on in the competition and risk creating an even more controversial result.



