Do you think magazines just make this stuff up the information in their articles are provided by ITV so that they can promote their show for them. The press also attended filming of the stunts back in August and would have got a lot of information then, information probably not in the emails you get from ITV (hard as it may be for you to believe there are people in the media who have higher clearance than you and wider access to spoilers, it is indeed the case)

So Aaron kidnaps a child but its alright as he does it to protect his murdering boyfriend. Bless him

That's quite funny!
The Press get told as much as ITV want them to know.
I don't get, or need, emails.

I distinctly remember him scolding Robert for a similar crime, but who cares Aaron can do whatever he likes without facing retribution.

He kindnaps a "child" who sexually abused a young woman with little to no remorse, shot his own grandad (causing his mother to frame an innocent man in order to protect him), and now is telling vile lies about a person Aaron loves. Lachlan is harldy an innocent child.

That said, Aaron's move is clearly a stupid one.

exactly, so why are you forever questioning articles that have been cleared for release by the ITV press office and ignoring the existence of press days such as the one journalists attended in August were they watched the stunt being filmed?

A 'child' threatening to make false allegations of sexual abuse against someone (which is almost as low as actually sexually assaulting someone but the 'child' already has that covered) but no you are right the person whose behaviour we should all be horrified at in this instance is Aaron

(Aaron reacts rashly and irresponsibly, Lachlan however is the lowest of the low)

BIB: Not actually true. Aaron has been held to account for most of his misdemeanours. The only three outstanding, as far as I can remember, are his involvement in Charity's chop shop (no one was held to account), his involvement in the Home Farm robbery (no one was held to account and Ross was rewarded) and the assault of the warehouse worker in the warehouse raid (most serious, in my view). Other Emmerdale residents have engaged in much more serious criminality and have never been held to account at all!

They wrote/dictated/recorded them, so they're bound to 'clear' them.
I'd often prefer to be able to ignore the existence of Press days.

You left out the part where he helped cover up katies death which is the most serious, also he bottled James and there is also his assault on Robert ( which was romantic and angsty so doesn't count, right? )

Yes, I grant you those two too. But he's still been held to account for most of his misdemeanours.

Of course, at the time that he covered up Katie's death, he did think that it was an accident. That said, it was still a crime.

So why do you persist on coming into these threads, question the authenticity of the spoilers then wait for someone to provide it and dismiss it as unimportant to you anway?

Quite a serious crime regardless of what he thought previously, also now he knows the truth he can't take the moral high ground. He keeps it a secret for selfish reasons in the sense that he doesn't want to get in trouble and he's happy with Robert.

Right so you (finally) admit that the information in the magazines this fortnight relating to what happens during the week beginning the 17th of October is from an official ITV source? So the next time you ask for a link and it is provided please be a bit more gracious and a little less rude.

I know they have, and the characters you're talking about are probably characters I also dislike.

However, the majority of soap villains own being a soap villain, Aaron behaves like a soap villain but is treated as a soap hero and plays the victim.

Therein lies my major problem with the character.

Still a child though isn't he? It's a disgusting lie for Lachlan to tell but considering what Robert has done, it's the least he deserves. I'm still not buying into Robert being the knight in shining armour out to destroy the evil Whites.

Kidnapping Lachlan is rash and idiotic and is probably down out of anger more than anything else because Aaron has been sexually abused, but it doesn't mean he should get away with Kidnapping a minor. But Robron fans will likely shrug it off because Aaron and Robert have an extra long kissing sequence or hold hands...

Wow this sounds very interesting.

Teifiboi doesn't ship Robron Lucy so you are barking up the wrong tree there

Lachlan shot his own grandfather and another man lost his freedom and family because his family "protected him" he sexually assaulted an unconscious woman and got away with a few counselling sessions and to this day fails to show one iota of remorse for what he did. His victim lost everything including her son.

None of the characters named in the thread title are saints and they all have a fair few outstanding crimes to answer for but none more so than that little creep.

Drug running and stealing from the vet's surgery
Lizzie - assault and robbery
Viv's shop (with Belle) - robbery
David's (with Belle) - robbery

Patronising much? If they (and I include me in that) don't get hung up on it, it will be more likely to do with how vile the 'victim' is and because they actually have the ability to look at what happens in context and weigh up the rights and wrongs and make a judgement call on how comfortable they are with it. The same as all other emmerdale fans do.

Its a soap, 5 minutes of happiness is enough

AARON ON A CLIFF EDGE???????

Someone push the boring bastard off. There's a MASSIVE reward in it for you.

I would die laughing if Robert did, but Lachlan would do. Or anyone. Pearl, maybe.

"Sorry, love, you're just too boring to live." *pushes* *flicks scarf*

NO!

Losing Aaron on top of Andy would be too much for me

I have never made out that Aaron is an angel. He most certainly is not! I was merely refuting the contention that 'Aaron can do whatever he likes without facing retribution', which is demonstrably untrue.