• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Strictly Come Dancing
Anastacia and Brendan Cole WILL perform this Saturday
<<
<
2 of 8
>>
>
poppyr
04-10-2016
Originally Posted by Heatherbell:
“Couldn't agree more on every point .
All the prolonged explanations and reminding that her fee goes to charity won't make the whole Sunday night messy scenario look any less dodgy and just wrong .”

I can't stand the fact she is donating her fee to charity continually being mentioned and has put me off Anastacia. How do we know that other contestants aren't doing the same thing but have chosen not to make it public, it feels like emotional blackmail. I still say she was selfish for not withdrawing when she couldn't do the dance off so I won't be supporting her.
Domestos
04-10-2016
Originally Posted by penelopesimpson:
“So now Breast Cancer has completely taken over a light entertainment show. This may well have been the agenda all along.”

Strictly has always been associated with various charities I believe.
poppyr
04-10-2016
Originally Posted by Domestos:
“Strictly has always been associated with various charities I believe.”

I don't think that's the case now and would be interested to hear which charities benefit from the programme?
penelopesimpson
04-10-2016
Originally Posted by Domestos:
“Strictly has always been associated with various charities I believe.”

Benefitting from a charitable donation is one thing
A documentary about Breast Cancer is another
Hijacking a light entertainment show is quite different.
yellowlabbie
04-10-2016
Originally Posted by Domestos:
“Strictly has always been associated with various charities I believe.”

Wasn't it originally associated with Children in Need?
Ellie1967
04-10-2016
A couple of articles about the change in pay structure

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/t...ntestants.html

http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2013...n_3747142.html
Domestos
04-10-2016
Originally Posted by yellowlabbie:
“Wasn't it originally associated with Children in Need?”

That or Sports Relief, I can't remember which.
aggs
04-10-2016
Originally Posted by jtnorth:
“Sorry to be thick, but do you mean 'stay one month or less' and get £25k, or do you get least if you go first? I hadn't thought of this decision actually taking money from Melvin.”

Payment will start at Launch show, so everyone will be in for 4 weeks.
aggs
04-10-2016
Originally Posted by Domestos:
“That or Sports Relief, I can't remember which.”

Sports relief was series one, then CIN from series 2 through to series 4? Or 5? - now any residual monies from the phone voting goes to Charity.
Domestos
04-10-2016
Originally Posted by aggs:
“Sports relief was series one, then CIN from series 2 through to series 4? Or 5? - now any residual monies from the phone voting goes to Charity.”

Thank you for clarifying.
yellowlabbie
04-10-2016
Originally Posted by Domestos:
“That or Sports Relief, I can't remember which.”

Just Googled, profits from phone votes from series 1 went to Sports Relief, then to Children in Need from series 2-5.
yellowlabbie
04-10-2016
Originally Posted by aggs:
“Sports relief was series one, then CIN from series 2 through to series 4? Or 5? - now any residual monies from the phone voting goes to Charity.”

You beat me to it.
holly berry
04-10-2016
A VW should be relatively safe for her.

She might even give Pamela Stephenson a run for her money ...
duckylucky
04-10-2016
Glad to hear the damage is not to bad and repairable . It must have been a terrible worry
GabeRich
04-10-2016
Originally Posted by cwickham:
“They get paid more if they stay in longer. (It is probably not a coincidence that this change was made after a series where their most expensive booking got eliminated first, by the by.)”

Wasn't there a lot of conspiracy theories last year over Peter Andre's pay to? How his PR firm got him more than the others?
amelia_lee
04-10-2016
I'm sorry to say I am one of the 'horrible' people who doesn't buy her injury and think it was injured pride of being in the dance off that stopped her danceing on Sunady.

Maybe she was sore, but from what I saw of her on Saturday night, the way she threw her arm up when it wasn't needed, the way she danced with Claudia afterwards, this was not someone in severe amounts of pain, and I have a lot of experience with chronic, severe any type of pain going.

There is no way that if she was so very injured she would already be working on the VW, of it was too dangerous for her to dance on Saturday. She could have danced with her arm by her side.

I don't know.

I wish her well on her health, I really do, I admire her and everything she has done, but I just feel something is off here.
cwickham
04-10-2016
Originally Posted by GabeRich:
“Wasn't there a lot of conspiracy theories last year over Peter Andre's pay to? How his PR firm got him more than the others?”

A negative conspiracy theory about the forum hate figure? Well I never!
GabeRich
04-10-2016
Originally Posted by holly berry:
“A VW should be relatively safe for her.

She might even give Pamela Stephenson a run for her money ...”

I'm not so sure. A VW requires a stiff posture, straight back, raised arms all the time and lots of spins. All of that will put tremendous strain on the exact region of her body where this tear has happened. Pain killers aside, she could do irreparable harm to herself if she goes through a week of training for that dance then the performance Saturday. Just look how much pain Danny was in with his VW and he is young and fit!
Tejas
04-10-2016
Originally Posted by cwickham:
“This isn't true. The celebrities get paid more depending on how far they make it into the competition.”

Yes, and Anasatacia has apparently stated that she has friends sponsoring her who will donate more money the longer she stays on the show.
penelopesimpson
04-10-2016
Originally Posted by Tejas:
“Yes, and Anasatacia has apparently stated that she has friends sponsoring her who will donate more money the longer she stays on the show.”

Oh, terrific. We'd better keep her in till the end then as this is obviously Strictly Come Breast Cancer
Tejas
04-10-2016
Originally Posted by Ellie1967:
“If they had announced they were getting rid of the DO for the entire series no one would be moaning. If no other contestant was going to get a second chance to save themselves in the DO that would be fine, but if Melvin is the only one who doesn't get that chance it's not exactly fair.”

Precisely. Its not about whether or not we voted for Melvin, in fact the person who was eliminated is largely irrelevant. The point is that one contestant did not get the same chance to fight for their place that all others will.

Maybe now Anastacia has been reassured that she can dance and is no longer too scared, she should perform last week's routine again in a dance-off scenario with Melvin doing likewise?
Domestos
04-10-2016
Originally Posted by Tejas:
“Precisely. Its not about whether or not we voted for Melvin, in fact the person who was eliminated is largely irrelevant. The point is that one contestant did not get the same chance to fight for their place that all others will.

Maybe now Anastacia has been reassured that she can dance and is no longer too scared, she should perform last week's routine again in a dance-off scenario with Melvin doing likewise?”

That would just be silly. The Producers should have just deferred the dance off to a double elimination this week. Mind so many have said how unfair the dance off is and how the judges manipulate it, you would think people would be delighted the public chose the outcome.
CravenHaven
04-10-2016
Originally Posted by VicsMum:
“"She is doing this to raise money for breast cancer”

When you've sold 80 million records, you don't 'need' the 70k or whatever has been floated for doing Strictly.
But think of all the women's magazine covers you could get if you make waves in the competition. That's the kind of publicity that's hard to buy.
Some people think successful showbiz people don't need more publicity. They're usually the same people that think showbiz people will retire when they get old.
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Rhumbatugger
04-10-2016
Originally Posted by penelopesimpson:
“So now Breast Cancer has completely taken over a light entertainment show. This may well have been the agenda all along.”

It certainly seems that way.

Originally Posted by Domestos:
“That or Sports Relief, I can't remember which.”

General though, not attached, emotionally, and with added drama, to ONE contestant.

Originally Posted by penelopesimpson:
“Oh, terrific. We'd better keep her in till the end then as this is obviously Strictly Come Breast Cancer”

Well exactly.


I wish her well, but I'm not comfortable with any of this. It isn't some telethon and neither should Anastacia's story' dominate.

It's about dancing and fun. And the less it feels like this is what Strictly is, the less I want to see it.
Domestos
04-10-2016
Originally Posted by penelopesimpson:
“Oh, terrific. We'd better keep her in till the end then as this is obviously Strictly Come Breast Cancer”

How so?

It's dominating the board but doesn't appear to be dominating the programme.
<<
<
2 of 8
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map