|
||||||||
Capaldi says he has "absolutely no plans to go" .... |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#51 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Moo
Posts: 1,148
|
Quote:
Like I said, stop attacking other forum members or you may get suspended/banned.
Are you being delibaratley irritating now? Is this a wind up? I hardly ever get angry on these forums, but your ridiculous "woe is me" nonsense is enough to annoy anyone. If you can't handle what was actually a fairly restrained, measured response, don't post such opinionated, polarizing comments. How about that in future? |
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#52 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 2,295
|
Quote:
Well, it's livened things up a bit, I suppose. Been pretty quiet around here recently until the sudden glut of news.
As for the topic, I still think there'll be a regeneration next year. After being intrigued by the prickly but strangely vulnerable and self doubting Doctor in Series 8 and impressed by the slightly more open but flawed (Ashildr. Immortality. That ended well, mate.) Doctor of Series 9, I hope not. But think so. Still, getting a bit ahead of myself there. Class. Christmas. Series 10. Time will tell...it always does. Obviously. |
|
|
|
|
#53 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Essex
Posts: 8,406
|
One interesting thing about season 10 - regardless as to whether there's a regeneration or not - is whether Bill's been designed as a one-season companion like Donna or if she's going to be in season 11 too. If so, I wonder if Chibnall's had some input into her character/story.
|
|
|
|
|
#54 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 6,080
|
Quote:
One interesting thing about season 10 - regardless as to whether there's a regeneration or not - is whether Bill's been designed as a one-season companion like Donna or if she's going to be in season 11 too. If so, I wonder if Chibnall's had some input into her character/story.
|
|
|
|
|
#55 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 175
|
Quote:
The fact that it's still here six years later, after changing up from a hugely successful initial five years, says enough. Not many shows make it past ten years. Doctor Who's revival has and there's still a lot more to come.
Perhaps your TV expertise needs a little refreshing? No, it's fine thanks. |
|
|
|
|
#56 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 1,428
|
Quote:
The fall in viewing figures between seasons 8 and 9 is noteable
|
|
|
|
|
#57 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 695
|
Ratings are down for numerous reasons. First of all is after 9 seasons a lot of the initial influx of new fans, would have left. It happens with every show, ratings go down because more and more people like different things etc etc and therefore down they go, doesn't mean the quality has.
Another reason horrific advertising, especially since their was an increase in the christmas special, it shows people still know about the show but need advertising to drag them in. As it is casual fans which make up the numbers, not hardcore fans. That said they did miss an opportunity to attract some new fans in S8, but sidelined Capaldi for Clara that didn't help. The biggest reason why though, is less people and families watching TV. Everything is done online, it means more streams, less ratings and tougher to actually attract the family to watch the show. And with their being so many good shows, the competition is endless and people may put Doctor Who in the background. That is the reasons why ratings are down, and if the BBC thought otherwise Capaldi would have been asked to leave. Because there is a final positive factor which i haven't mentioned, this show is world wide and very popular. It isn't just one demographic anymore. |
|
|
|
|
#58 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Essex
Posts: 8,406
|
The show's always had mass appeal. Some people just didn't like to admit they watched it. But certainly since 2005 it's not been something people were embarrassed to admit they watched.
|
|
|
|
|
#59 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 3,355
|
Quote:
I'm afraid to say that I find "Mulett" and "doctor blue box" rather arrogant.
They both seem to be under the impression that they know what's best for the show. They appear to hold a steadfast belief that they know better than the television professionals behind making the show. The BBC bosses, the people with facts, ratings, reviews and figures at their fingertips, have asked Peter Capaldi to stay on for another year. But "Mulett" and "doctor blue box" seem to think that they are more knowledgeable. They seem to think that they hold the answers on how to advance the show, whilst the professionals are incompetent and neglectful, and have no idea how to move the show forward. It's sheer arrogance, it really is. They may not like Capaldi all that much. That is their opinion, which they are entitled to. Yet the way they are asserting that the bosses are wrong and they are right is just foolhardy really. When posters such as yourself resort to personal insults in such a way, it clearly shows you have nothing constructive to say. Quote:
Well the people running it haven't done such a good job over the last five years, have they?
|
|
|
|
|
#60 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 695
|
Quote:
Well the people running it haven't done such a good job over the last five years, have they?
|
|
|
|
|
#61 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 695
|
Quote:
One interesting thing about season 10 - regardless as to whether there's a regeneration or not - is whether Bill's been designed as a one-season companion like Donna or if she's going to be in season 11 too. If so, I wonder if Chibnall's had some input into her character/story.
|
|
|
|
|
#62 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,831
|
Quote:
I certainly accept it's a minority view on this forum. But outside this forum I think it is a more widely view held that the 12th Doctor's persona has been a mistake. The fall in viewing figures between seasons 8 and 9 is noteable, as is Peter Capaldi's failure to be short-listed for the NTA award two years running.
Add to that the rather sudden and, dare I say, desperate re-writing of the 12th Doctor's personality for season 9 which (for me) suggests even within the BBC there is an acceptance they got it wrong. I don't think anyone has suggested the show is dead, but I would certainly say it's less popular since the 12th Doctor came along. And the evidence is actually there to support that view. If I'm honest, I still don't think they've got it right but I do wonder if part of the issue has been Clara. I will be interested to see if the new companion brings out the best in the 12th Doctor because if we get another year of the same I might drop the show until Chibnall starts. It's sad how little I've missed it this year. A new showrunner with new ideas, new scripts and a new companion who hopefully won't suck all of the life, energy and fun out of the show is exactly what we need. We should keep The Doctor and see what he can do with good scripts and without being written merely as a secondary character to a sidekick. |
|
|
|
|
#63 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,831
|
Quote:
Are you being delibaratley irritating now? Is this a wind up?
I hardly ever get angry on these forums, but your ridiculous "woe is me" nonsense is enough to annoy anyone. If you can't handle what was actually a fairly restrained, measured response, don't post such opinionated, polarizing comments. How about that in future?
|
|
|
|
|
#64 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Moo
Posts: 1,148
|
Quote:
Yes, how arrogant to have similar opinions that happen to differ to yours. I don't know what we were thinking going on a doctor who opinion forum to give our doctor who opinions.
When posters such as yourself resort to personal insults in such a way, it clearly shows you have nothing constructive to say. Careful there, posting such an opinion will get you branded 'arrogant' by Thamwet Yes, thankyou for demonstrating. As I said, I really don't care what your opinion is, I simply dislike the way you seem to think that you know what's best for the show, whereas the bosses do not. I'm not alone in thinking this either, I'd bet. Shame you and Mulett seem to take it as a personal insult, but that is your problem, not mine. |
|
|
|
|
#65 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Moo
Posts: 1,148
|
Quote:
On a slightly different note, Thamwet, is your name actually Matthew? I just happened to notice that your handle is an anagram of Matthew.
![]() Well spotted!
|
|
|
|
|
#66 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 2,295
|
Quote:
It is, yes.
Well spotted! |
|
|
|
|
#67 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Moo
Posts: 1,148
|
Quote:
Wow really lol.
But as it's not a real word, I guess anything goes. |
|
|
|
|
#68 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 6,561
|
Quote:
I certainly accept it's a minority view on this forum. But outside this forum I think it is a more widely view held that the 12th Doctor's persona has been a mistake. The fall in viewing figures between seasons 8 and 9 is noteable, as is Peter Capaldi's failure to be short-listed for the NTA award two years running.
Add to that the rather sudden and, dare I say, desperate re-writing of the 12th Doctor's personality for season 9 which (for me) suggests even within the BBC there is an acceptance they got it wrong. I don't think anyone has suggested the show is dead, but I would certainly say it's less popular since the 12th Doctor came along. And the evidence is actually there to support that view. If I'm honest, I still don't think they've got it right but I do wonder if part of the issue has been Clara. I will be interested to see if the new companion brings out the best in the 12th Doctor because if we get another year of the same I might drop the show until Chibnall starts. It's sad how little I've missed it this year. Series 9 improved considerably. |
|
|
|
|
#69 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 3,355
|
Quote:
Yes, thankyou for demonstrating.
As I said, I really don't care what your opinion is, I simply dislike the way you seem to think that you know what's best for the show, whereas the bosses do not. I'm not alone in thinking this either, I'd bet. Quote:
Shame you and Mulett seem to take it as a personal insult, but that is your problem, not mine.
|
|
|
|
|
#70 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Moo
Posts: 1,148
|
Quote:
Everyone has there view on how the show could be improved in times they aren't enjoying it as much. Are you really suggesting that you've never thought that something could have been done/been handled better, and haven't said so on this forum, because I don't believe that for a minute.
Out of the blue name calling is pretty much the definition of a personal insult. No, I've expressed my opinions before. Sure. That isn't what you were doing though, you were basically saying "here is how the show needs to go forward, I am right and the bosses are clueless, uninformed and wrong." I'm afraid that IS arrogance, to give the impression that you know better than the professionals. Anyway, try and get over it, huh? I've been called by far worse on the internet and face to face. |
|
|
|
|
#71 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 1,593
|
I was really disappointed by Series 8 and I can understand it was part of the reason for the drop in viewers for Series 9 (as well as poor scheduling). Series 9 for me proved it wasn't Capaldi that that had been the problem but the writing (some of the story decisions were appalling - not just the moon and egg but also making the Doctor out to be an idiot in Robot's of Sherwood (and pretty much everything else about that story) and the way the Doctor was developed. There is some great stuff in there but overseeing of it all seemed more like a fan with no experience than a professional.
If they had just gone to the much better series 9 instead I think things would have gone down a lot better but it was too late and in the minds of the audience Peter Capaldi was the problem - which is a real shame. I also think Clara should have gone at the end of 2014 - I never really was a fan of her |
|
|
|
|
#72 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 3,355
|
Quote:
No, I've expressed my opinions before. Sure. That isn't what you were doing though, you were basically saying "here is how the show needs to go forward, I am right and the bosses are clueless, uninformed and wrong." I'm afraid that IS arrogance, to give the impression that you know better than the professionals.
Anyway, try and get over it, huh? I've been called by far worse on the internet and face to face. Also, saying 'get over it' won't help you brush under the carpet the fact that you created a post to attack two forum members personally, who had done nothing to provoke you. |
|
|
|
|
#73 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Moo
Posts: 1,148
|
Quote:
Yes, because I remember that time I called the bosses clueless...oh no, wait, it NEVER HAPPENED. All I've ever done, like many posters who have not enjoyed the Moffat era as much as what came before is to simply state my opinion that I haven't been enjoying it, and what i'd like to see in future that would make me enjoy it again.
Also, saying 'get over it' won't help you brush under the carpet the fact that you created a post to attack two forum members personally, who had done nothing to provoke you. Quote from you: "Sigh. Indeed. So all the mainstream audience see is the 'same old, same old' that they've largely lost interest in, and Chibnall's chance to reinvigorate the show and the ratings disappears before he's even written a word if Capaldi does stay for series 11. For me personally, it's not that I entirely dislike Capaldi in the role, but I would want a clean break from the Moffat era once he's finally out the door, with a Doctor that isn't already associated with a ratings drop era." END QUOTE It's not what just what you say, it's the attitude that comes across. The bosses, who have by far more knowledge on the show's wellbeing than you do, have decided to offer Capaldi another year. Just as they decided to offer him series 10, when I reckon they'd have had time to find someone else if they'd wanted to, what with a huge gap in production. Yet for some unknown reason, you think that you know more about the show's health. You try to pass off your opinions as fact, you seem to have decided that the show is in a bad way, and that the bosses can't possibly know as much about it as you do. It's not what you say always. It's what you imply. I echo my advice to "Mulett." You, like the rest of us here, are a fan. You do NOT have a broad picture of the show's current viability and success, nor do you really have any business knowing it. You should simply enjoy watching the show, and when the bosses show signs of concern, then it might be time to worry. But as they haven't yet shown any such concern, we have no reason to be. I mean, come on. You can't seriously think that the BBC would have let Capaldi stay on for three series, let alone offer him a fourth, if they were worried? |
|
|
|
|
#74 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 3,355
|
Quote:
Quote from you: "Sigh. Indeed. So all the mainstream audience see is the 'same old, same old' that they've largely lost interest in, and Chibnall's chance to reinvigorate the show and the ratings disappears before he's even written a word if Capaldi does stay for series 11.
For me personally, it's not that I entirely dislike Capaldi in the role, but I would want a clean break from the Moffat era once he's finally out the door, with a Doctor that isn't already associated with a ratings drop era." END QUOTE It's not what just what you say, it's the attitude that comes across. The bosses, who have by far more knowledge on the show's wellbeing than you do, have decided to offer Capaldi another year. Just as they decided to offer him series 10, when I reckon they'd have had time to find someone else if they'd wanted to, what with a huge gap in production. Yet for some unknown reason, you think that you know more about the show's health. You try to pass off your opinions as fact, you seem to have decided that the show is in a bad way, and that the bosses can't possibly know as much about it as you do. It's not what you say always. It's what you imply. I echo my advice to "Mulett." You, like the rest of us here, are a fan. You do NOT have a broad picture of the show's current viability and success, nor do you really have any business knowing it. You should simply enjoy watching the show, and when the bosses show signs of concern, then it might be time to worry. But as they haven't yet shown any such concern, we have no reason to be. I mean, come on. You can't seriously think that the BBC would have let Capaldi stay on for three series, let alone offer him a fourth, if they were worried? I do think a fresh start needs to be a fresh start completely to get the best chance at a new/returning audience, indeed. I stand by it, and every word in the above post from me that you've quoted. But that is simply my opinion, and one shared by others in the same way that the idea that Capaldi should stay is an opinion, shared by various posters. If I had the same conviction in my opinions as I do now, but they were opinions that matched yours, I'm sure you'd be patting me on the back rather than insulting me. It all comes down to you seemingly thinking that personally insulting those who dare to say a different view to yours is acceptable, when it isn't. Continue to try and bully, lecture and insult if you really feel the need, but you won't scare me off from expressing my opinion. Your opinion is no more valid than mine. |
|
|
|
|
#75 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 1,506
|
Quote:
I don't try to' pretend I know whats best', I simply say how I think things could be improved, or done better in my personal opinion, and no more so more than any of the other more passionate posters on here. What you perceive as me thinking I know whats best is simply me saying what I'd like to see, which many posters do all the time.
I do think a fresh start needs to be a fresh start completely to get the best chance at a new/returning audience, indeed. I stand by it, and every word in the above post from me that you've quoted. But that is simply my opinion, and one shared by others in the same way that the idea that Capaldi should stay is an opinion, shared by various posters. If I had the same conviction in my opinions as I do now, but they were opinions that matched yours, I'm sure you'd be patting me on the back rather than insulting me. It all comes down to you thinking that personally insulting those who dare to say a different view to yours is acceptable, when it isn't. Continue to try and bully, lecture and insult if you feel the need, but you won't scare me off from expressing my opinion. Your opinion is no more valid than mine. |
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 20:20.



Well spotted!
