• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • TV Shows: UK
Have I Got News for You - Series 52
<<
<
8 of 23
>>
>
Grafenwalder
31-10-2016
Originally Posted by jjwales:
“And Waitress perhaps. Gradually being superseded by Bartender and Server.”

Bartender sounds very American to me and as for Server, never heard of that anywhere. Sounds more like a term applied to a ball game. Barman/Barmaid, Waiter/Waitress is perfectly fine.

What one earth is the matter with people today?
jjwales
31-10-2016
Originally Posted by Grafenwalder:
“Bartender sounds very American to me and as for Server, never heard of that anywhere.”

They were probably American terms originally, but they're being used over here now, particularly within the trade.

Quote:
“ Sounds more like a term applied to a ball game. Barman/Barmaid, Waiter/Waitress is perfectly fine.

What one earth is the matter with people today? ”

Nothing's wrong with them. There's just a gradual move towards gender-neutral terms for workers.
Virgil Tracy
31-10-2016
Originally Posted by jjwales:
“Same reason that words like "authoress" and "sculptress" have fallen out of favour. All to do with gender equality I guess, and the fact that we don't really need gender-specific terms for various occupations.”

gender equality ? what are you on about ?

we can't mention if someone's a woman now ?
JeffG1
31-10-2016
I believe in the US they invented "waitron" to replace waiter/waitress. I don't know if that ever caught on.
jjwales
31-10-2016
Originally Posted by Virgil Tracy:
“gender equality ? what are you on about ?”

You've never heard of it? Where have you been for the last few decades??!!

Quote:
“We can't mention if someone's a woman now ? ”

Of course we can. But you must surely agree that there's no real need to have different terms for males and females doing exactly the same job. For example it's more convenient to say that a force employs 3,000 police officers, rather than 3,000 policemen and policewomen.
Faust
31-10-2016
Originally Posted by JazzyJaney:
“All I've seen about HIGNFY this week is Corbyn supporters slagging David off for being right wing (obviously complete garbage and anybody who even watched this show would realise that). And then Tories saying it's an outrage he wished Cameron dead and he shouldn't be expressing his left wing political views. He literally cannot win and it's a shame because if people just calmed down and enjoyed this show which is about comedy and satire (The dictionary definition - the use of humour, irony, exaggeration, or ridicule to expose and criticize people's stupidity or vices, particularly in the context of contemporary politics and other topical issues.) then they might actually have a laugh, you never know.”

We live in an age where people enjoy being offended, it gives their sad lives some purpose to feign self-righteous indignation. I blame social media for a great deal of this. We have completely lost the ability to laugh at ourselves. The degree of anger vented in a Twitter storm over the most trivial of matters is something to behold.

You only have to look at the bile and vitriol aimed at Asda yesterday because their online payments system crashed. You would have thought the world was coming to an end. People really need to get a grip.
Faust
31-10-2016
Originally Posted by Virgil Tracy:
“gender equality ? what are you on about ?

we can't mention if someone's a woman now ? ”

I'm with you on this though I think Lord Sugar sums up most peoples feelings HERE
Virgil Tracy
31-10-2016
Originally Posted by jjwales:
“You've never heard of it? Where have you been for the last few decades??!!


Of course we can. But you must surely agree that there's no real need to have different terms for males and females doing exactly the same job. For example it's more convenient to say that a force employs 3,000 police officers, rather than 3,000 policemen and policewomen.”

I wasn't talking about policemen I was talking about comics on a panel show , so if there's 4 comics in a show and 3 are male and 1 is female it makes perfect sense to me to refer to the female one as female , that way it clearly identifies who I'm talking about .
so - yes , that same logic would apply if I wanted to refer to a female copper too .

and what's all this 'gender neutralizing' nonsense ? is this where we've arrived at now ? I don't want people gender neutralized , I appreciate the differences .

.
Grafenwalder
31-10-2016
Originally Posted by jjwales:
“They were probably American terms originally, but they're being used over here now, particularly within the trade.”

Well they should stay where they belong! They make enough mess in their own country and we don't need them invading ours with their American English.

Quote:
“Nothing's wrong with them. There's just a gradual move towards gender-neutral terms for workers.”

More like neutrality nonsense imo. I like to know if i'm to see a policewoman or policeman and so on. If people have an issue with that then tough.
jjwales
31-10-2016
Originally Posted by Virgil Tracy:
“I wasn't talking about policemen I was talking about comics on a panel show , so if there's 4 comics in a show and 3 are male and 1 is female it makes perfect sense to me to refer to the female one as female , that way it clearly identifies who I'm talking about .
so - yes , that same logic would apply if I wanted to refer to a female copper too.”

I see your point. But what if there was a panel of four doctors (3 male, 1 female) and you wanted to refer to the female doctor?

Quote:
“and what's all this 'gender neutralizing' nonsense ? is this where we've arrived at now ? I don't want people gender neutralized , I appreciate the differences .”

Yes, if it's relevant, why not? But most occupations (doctors, engineers, plumbers etc etc) already have gender-neutral titles, and no one thinks of them as nonsense!
jjwales
31-10-2016
Originally Posted by Grafenwalder:
“Well they should stay where they belong! They make enough mess in their own country and we don't need them invading ours with their American English.

More like neutrality nonsense imo. I like to know if i'm to see a policewoman or policeman and so on.”

Why should it matter though? If a company is going to send an engineer out to you to repair something, would you demand to know whether they are sending a male or a female?
lundavra
31-10-2016
Originally Posted by jjwales:
“Of course we can. But you must surely agree that there's no real need to have different terms for males and females doing exactly the same job. For example it's more convenient to say that a force employs 3,000 police officers, rather than 3,000 policemen and policewomen.”

'WPC' still seems to be used a lot though.
Virgil Tracy
31-10-2016
Originally Posted by jjwales:
“I see your point. But what if there was a panel of four doctors (3 male, 1 female) and you wanted to refer to the female doctor?


Yes, if it's relevant, why not? But most occupations (doctors, engineers, plumbers etc etc) already have gender-neutral titles, and no one thinks of them as nonsense!”

well you just said it : "female doctor" , how does that fit your 'gender neutral' routine ?
Lenitive
31-10-2016
Can we get back to the programme, men?
jjwales
31-10-2016
Originally Posted by Virgil Tracy:
“well you just said it : "female doctor" , how does that fit your 'gender neutral' routine ?”

Not doctress?
Virgil Tracy
31-10-2016
something that bothered me was the bit about being 'more or less half-hearted ' I was surprised that a pedant like Mitchell didn't pick up on that - would 'more half-hearted' mean less enthusiastic , or more enthusiastic . ?

(I need to get out more I know )
Grafenwalder
31-10-2016
Originally Posted by jjwales:
“Why should it matter though? If a company is going to send an engineer out to you to repair something, would you demand to know whether they are sending a male or a female? ”

It matters a lot. I'd expect a company to act professionally and tell me exactly who they are sending and not waffle some 'gender neutral' nonsense.

Originally Posted by Virgil Tracy:
“well you just said it : "female doctor" , how does that fit your 'gender neutral' routine ?”

Spot on. My surgery practice has one female and four male GP's. The receptionist always asks your preference when booking appts.
pad_ehh
01-11-2016
Ian scurried off the set during the credits. Wonder why he was in such a hurry.
gomezz
01-11-2016
Originally Posted by JeffG1:
“I believe in the US they invented "waitron" to replace waiter/waitress. I don't know if that ever caught on.”

Sounds like an robot waiter.
Baz_James
01-11-2016
Originally Posted by Grafenwalder:
“Bartender sounds very American to me”

Well, it isn't. And server's been used as a term for waiting staff since the 15th Century at least.
Baz_James
01-11-2016
Originally Posted by gomezz:
“Sounds like an robot waiter.”

Indeed. One of the reasons it's heading rapidly for the status of 'obsolete word very much of its time' (the '80s).
Baz_James
01-11-2016
Originally Posted by Grafenwalder:
“
Spot on. My surgery practice has one female and four male GP's. The receptionist always asks your preference when booking appts.”

And do you get a choice of male of female receptionists to make this appointment? I bet your local Specsavers (other ophthalmologists are available) doesn't ask you whether you'd prefer a male or female optician. Do you refuse to get on a bus or a train if the driver isn't blessed with the gender you prefer?

The trend toward the removal of gender specific titles long predates concerns with political correctness or feminist sensitivities. The use of sculptress has been in decline since the '40s, authoress since the '50s, the 1850s that is! That's the pragmatism of language development not some hideous political campaign to corrupt and neuter English as we know it.
jjwales
01-11-2016
Originally Posted by Grafenwalder:
“It matters a lot. I'd expect a company to act professionally and tell me exactly who they are sending and not waffle some 'gender neutral' nonsense.”

Eh? Since when is the word "engineer" "gender-neutral nonsense"? Why should they inform you whether they're sending a man or a woman to do the job?

Quote:
“Spot on. My surgery practice has one female and four male GP's. The receptionist always asks your preference when booking appts.”

In a case like that, it's quite reasonable to request a preference. In most other cases it's not. And "female doctor" is not a specific job title anyway!
Grafenwalder
01-11-2016
Originally Posted by Baz_James:
“And do you get a choice of male of female receptionists to make this appointment?”

It's manned between five women working part time.


Originally Posted by jjwales:
“Eh? Since when is the word "engineer" "gender-neutral nonsense"? Why should they inform you whether they're sending a man or a woman to do the job?”

No. The question you ought to be asking is why shouldn't a company state who the person is? You are attempting to 'normalise' this stupidity by erasing gender as though male and female have ceased to exist from the human race. I've never read such ridiculous rubbish.

Anyway, you took this completely off thread topic so i'm not coming back on this.
Granny McSmith
01-11-2016
Originally Posted by Grafenwalder:
“It's manned between five women working part time.


.”

Womanned.
<<
<
8 of 23
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map