|
||||||||
The Return of Doctor Mysterio |
| View Poll Results: What did you think of this? | |||
| Loved it! |
|
83 | 42.35% |
| In the middle |
|
64 | 32.65% |
| Hated it. |
|
42 | 21.43% |
| Not Sure |
|
7 | 3.57% |
| Voters: 196. You can't vote on this poll right now - are you signed in? | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#151 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Essex
Posts: 8,406
|
Steven Moffat is trending on Twitter. But not in a good way
|
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#152 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Kessingland, Suffolk
Posts: 85,561
|
Quote:
Can you imagine a doctor who story where the karnkus, (the superhero from the 'mindrobber') had somehow escaped into our world?
That would have been quite a story..... |
|
|
|
|
#153 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 2,275
|
Quote:
You realize that's to do with the writing and not Peter right?
And the Doctor has always been rude, have people forgotten the ninth Doctor and how rude he was, and that's what kicked the show back off, even Tennants Doctor was rude at many times... And a lot of the Old who Doctors were rude to, including the two most popular classic Doctors, Pertwee and Tom Baker.... |
|
|
|
|
|
#154 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 26
|
Quote:
Again with so much of Moffats work and his era with DW, there's no thought about the consequences of the things the writers create and say... just like with the moon egg episode and the magic tree episode where some how Earth was fine even though in both those episodes Earth should of been devastated... or how in Power of three where those people should of all been dead from the heart failure.... but nope it is all brushed over, there are no consequences in this show.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#155 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 5,887
|
One liner, quip, random plot point, quip, the Doctor boasting, quip, a bit of plot that doesn't make a lot of sense, self-aware nod to the audience, one liner, quip, add a 'funny' turn by this episodes comedy guest star, mention something about how lonely the Doctor is, melodramatic moment, quip, running low on time because of too many quips so let's wrap up the threat in one sentence, quip, focus on the Doctor looking lonely, cue end credits. Pretty much sums up most 'light-hearted' Doctor Who episodes these days for me and I found that difficult to get through I'm afraid. I'd love to post something positive so I will say the guest cast were pretty good.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#156 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 1,506
|
Quote:
Yes, of course I realise it's down to the writing. Do you think I'm stupid that I don't know the difference? Come off it. I know the writing leads the way, but an actor can take a line a different way.
To me, the Doctor has never been full on rude as he has been with Capaldi. He can be a bit brusk at times but not rude. Even Doctors of old weren't rude like Capaldi's have been. There's always that twinkle in their eye that deep down they don't mean it. I never get that with Capaldi's Doctor. He's rude and he means it. It's not an endearing quality for a lead character in the slightest... Oh, and BIB. No need to be so rude... |
|
|
|
|
|
#157 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 2,275
|
Quote:
I really don't know about that. Compared to how Pertwee, Hartnell and Baker could be at some times; Capaldi is perfectly innocent.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#158 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 1,506
|
Quote:
But there's a difference, the character has evolved, quite literally, since that era. And so has the viewership and the way people watch TV. Even as a fan of the show, I find it hard to accept that the Doctor would regress, so to speak, after the development we invested in through Tennant and Smith. Ultimately, it seems a shame that the title character development would go in a direction that fails to take into account its most successful formula with a global audience.
And I'm sure they did take into account the success of what worked with Tennant and Smith. Doesn't mean they're going to keep doing it again and again and let it run stale... they're going to change and experiment. If the show was the same as it was ten years ago it wouldn't even be here today. |
|
|
|
|
|
#159 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 2,275
|
Quote:
And I'm sure they did take into account the success of what worked with Tennant and Smith. Doesn't mean they're going to keep doing it again and again and let it run stale... they're going to change and experiment. If the show was the same as it was ten years ago it wouldn't even be here today.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#160 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 22,156
|
Quote:
Steven Moffat is trending on Twitter. But not in a good way
![]() the core story was actually good. When they went into the Brain room it was actually very scary. All the romance guff was just pointless and so badly written this idea of putting PC's doctor almost as a secondary character ? 1st it was Clara. Just reading the tweets and its summing up pretty much when people are getting slagged off on here for saying. |
|
|
|
|
#161 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 5,173
|
Quote:
We can compare him with Old Who incarnations until the cows come home, but in my opinion, notwithstanding his talents and dedication, Capaldi does lack a certain je ne sais quoi that could capture a global audience in the same way that Tennant or Smith managed.
Quote:
I don't think so. He went from charming and innocent with Peter Davison, back to rude and sinister with Colin Baker and Sylvester McCoy, then someone more approachable again with Paul McGann, to aggressive and alienated again with Christopher Eccleston. Even Patrick Troughton was far more friendly than his immediate predecessor or successor. Seems to me he's been all over the place.
And I'm sure they did take into account the success of what worked with Tennant and Smith. Doesn't mean they're going to keep doing it again and again and let it run stale... they're going to change and experiment. If the show was the same as it was ten years ago it wouldn't even be here today. |
|
|
|
|
|
#162 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 2,295
|
Just got round to watching it, it was Okay but it didn't feel like Doctor Who it felt more mundane to Doctor Who, its amazing for just another short Christmas Film or special you'll see on the guide but thats it. I found the American accents very distracting and the other American elements included aswell as the cheesey one-liners and quips you could come to expect from a Steven Moffat Christmas Romp. I didn't particularly care for Nardole or thought he added anything to the episode, personally I don't think the episode would've lost anything if he wasn't included.
I feel like Bill is gonna irritate me from the Coming Soon trailer her dialogue seemed a little bit contrived for me it didn't have the natural human touch like her predecessors (excluding Clara), I'll watch it but I feel like it'll be very average at best, personally because for me Doctor Who is one of those shows that if the main leads that we're gonna be spending most of our time with don't have any Charisma then it makes the plot fall flat for me. For me 2018 couldn't come soon enough I need a breath of fresh air from another Showrunner, I think Moffat is way past his sell-by-date, as I feel like this is as good as its gonna get. |
|
|
|
|
|
#163 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Scotland
Posts: 517
|
That was awful, just absolutely awful.
The only good thing to come from it is that it's made my mind up to give the next series a miss and try again once the new show runner is in place. |
|
|
|
|
|
#164 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 1,506
|
Quote:
Well to me, Capaldi's anti-social grandad act is what is stale. The magician outfit, the Malcolm Tucker accent, the boring haircut (which I appreciate he is subtly growing out), it all seems to me like a pretty big gamble with the new viewership, which is spoiled for choice and may not be as compelled to put up with drastic change as the Old Who audience. All I'm saying is, if it's about changing and experimenting, let's waste no time with the next makeover.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#165 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Whitefield, Manchester
Posts: 3,726
|
I wasn't expecting to enjoy that episode so for the first time since 2005, I didn't watch this Christmas special at the
same time it was being broadcast, and have just finished watching it on my YouView box. and I thought it was OK. Certainly nowhere near as bad as a lot of folks on this thread are making it out to be, especially those that were calling it an anagram of carp while the episode was still on. How can anyone follow an episode of a TV drama while they're busy being keyboard warriors posting on an internet forum throughout the episode? Did anyone else notice a subtle nod to BBC Radiophonic Workshop style incidental music during one scene ... ? |
|
|
|
|
|
#166 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 22,156
|
Quote:
That was awful, just absolutely awful.
The only good thing to come from it is that it's made my mind up to give the next series a miss and try again once the new show runner is in place. Even though 98% of the tweets are saying the same thing. Personally I still don't think Moffat gets how to write for PC's doctor. At the end he got MS's doctor down to a T. with some amazing stories that brought out the best in both of them. He lost It when Clara became the lead and the show became all about her. I actually liked Clara but you could see he found it easier writing stories for her than PC. |
|
|
|
|
#167 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Gallifrey
Posts: 1,934
|
It'll be interesting to see if the AI is closer to the internet's reaction (a good part negative) or the critics (who loved it - Radio Times 5/5, Daily Mail 4/5, etc.).
I can well believe it might be an episode much more appreciated by the general public. My family were certainly the most engaged they've been with Doctor Who for ages, even if I thought it was a 5/10. |
|
|
|
|
|
#168 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 2,275
|
Quote:
His haircut...?
![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#169 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 6,080
|
I honestly don't get this 'brusque' thing with this episode, or really since his 'Mid-life crisis' spell in his first series. (Well, okay, there's the shades and the electric guitar!) I thought The Doctor was in quite charming form from the off here, with an undertow of sadness that popped up a few times and were beautifully played.. Personally think he's getting better and better and am in no rush to see Capaldi move on.
(Still going with a gut feeling that Series 10 will be his last, though...) |
|
|
|
|
|
#170 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 3,123
|
Found it all very blah. It felt like Thw Doctor was a sub plot in and episode of a shitty America soap opera. Badly acted to boot.
Most definitely not worth the years wait. I'm thinking I'll give the new series a miss. I'm bored of the disappointment. Sorry but the sooner Moffat goes the better as far as I'm concerned. |
|
|
|
|
|
#171 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 2,295
|
Quote:
Be careful expressing an opinion like that here.
Even though 98% of the tweets are saying the same thing. Personally I still don't think Moffat gets how to write for PC's doctor. At the end he got MS's doctor down to a T. with some amazing stories that brought out the best in both of them. He lost It when Clara became the lead and the show became all about her. I actually liked Clara but you could see he found it easier writing stories for her than PC. |
|
|
|
|
|
#172 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Scotland
Posts: 517
|
Quote:
Be careful expressing an opinion like that here.
Even though 98% of the tweets are saying the same thing. Personally I still don't think Moffat gets how to write for PC's doctor. At the end he got MS's doctor down to a T. with some amazing stories that brought out the best in both of them. He lost It when Clara became the lead and the show became all about her. I actually liked Clara but you could see he found it easier writing stories for her than PC. As I said earlier though I'll be giving the next series a miss as I don't want to end up hating the show. |
|
|
|
|
|
#173 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Spain with Annie
Posts: 7,954
|
Quote:
Steven Moffat is trending on Twitter. But not in a good way
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#174 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 10,733
|
Did they do a deal with marvel for some of the sets from like daredevil etc as it had that look?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#175 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 2,295
|
Quote:
I only saw a few negative tweets. Most were to do with Sherlock or generally positive tweets when I did a search. But still, if it makes everyone feel better about hating the show at the moment, go ahead!
"The worse Steven Moffat era Doctor Who gets the more excited i am for him to FINALLY ****ING LEAVE" "#doctorwhochristmas was disappointing as always then. And followed with an ad for something else Steven Moffat has ruined... #Sherlock" "Capaldi is wasted on lame scripts and flaky storylines. I blame Steven Moffat for killing #DoctorWho." Just to quote a few, but I assure you it was much more than a few lol, but it would take me ages to quote all of them lol. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 23:51.




