• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Soaps
EE Why was Johnny at Whitney's hen night?
<<
<
2 of 4
>>
>
LHolmes
08-10-2016
Originally Posted by davejc64:
“Nonsense, he had to attend the hen party otherwise he would have had no reason to be outside when Pam and Les looked out. ”

He could have gone after Linda or Whitney to give them something they'd left behind eg. a phone. So no he didn't have to go on the hen night for the moment between he and Pam to exist.

Not that I wish to indulge your nitpicking. You seem determined to ignore the fact Whitney and Johnny have a friendship which originated under the previous actor.

We haven't seen much their friendship in recent months but then we haven't seen Johnny do much of anything since his return. That doesn't negate the fact they've always been friends. It's easy to imagine that friendship has continued. We don't see characters go to the loo but we know they do it.
Hankshaw
08-10-2016
Originally Posted by _elly001:
“Except they are. If they haven't seemed close since he returned it's because the writing for Johnny has been terrible for months now and it's only in the past few weeks that he's been written as a real person again and not a cipher. Whit and Johnny have always been good friends and it's nice that they've finally remembered that. And as for having him there to gossip about men - if that's why they had him there then why didn't they show that?”

My comment about gossip was a generalisation. His presence at the party has absolutely nothing to do with their friendship.
davejc64
08-10-2016
Originally Posted by LHolmes:
“He could have gone after Linda or Whitney to give them something they'd left behind eg. a phone. So no he didn't have to go on the hen night for the moment between he and Pam to exist.

Not that I wish to indulge your nitpicking. You seem determined to ignore the fact Whitney and Johnny have a friendship which originated under the previous actor.

We haven't seen much their friendship in recent months but then we haven't seen Johnny do much of anything since his return. That doesn't negate the fact they've always been friends. It's easy to imagine that friendship has continued. We don't see characters go to the loo but we know they do it.”

Are you sure, because this being soapland if we don't see it happen on scene then surely it doesn't happen?
dee123
08-10-2016
Originally Posted by davejc64:
“He just seemed out of place on what are usually all female events?”

'Cause these are the types of gay stereotypes EE is stuck in. Every other soap is so far ahead of them it's sad.
Skittle Bomb
08-10-2016
Originally Posted by dee123:
“'Cause these are the types of gay stereotypes EE is stuck in. Every other soap is so far ahead of them it's sad.”

Hang on. Johnny was there because he is Whitney's mate and soon to be brother in law. There wasn't anything stereotypical about him being there. Whitney wanted him there as her friend. The only thing that is sad are the people making something out of nothing.

And for the record Hollyoaks and Corrie often have their gay characters attending hen nights. Can't speak for Emmerdale as I don't watch it.
LHolmes
08-10-2016
Originally Posted by dee123:
“'Cause these are the types of gay stereotypes EE is stuck in. Every other soap is so far ahead of them it's sad.”

Or maybe he was there for no other reason than the fact he is Whitney's friend?
davejc64
08-10-2016
Originally Posted by LHolmes:
“Or maybe he was there for no other reason than the fact he is Whitney's friend?”

Or now that we have established he had to be there for that scene with Pam and Les.
Skittle Bomb
08-10-2016
Originally Posted by davejc64:
“Or now that we have established he had to be there for that scene with Pam and Les. ”

The scene with Pam and Les was as Pam put it. To show life still goes on.

I'm curious, what exactly is/was your problem with Johnny being there. You haven't actually given a reason.
_elly001
08-10-2016
Originally Posted by davejc64:
“Or now that we have established he had to be there for that scene with Pam and Les. ”

You are the only one saying this. We haven't 'established' anything.
_elly001
08-10-2016
Originally Posted by Skittle Bomb:
“Hang on. Johnny was there because he is Whitney's mate and soon to be brother in law. There wasn't anything stereotypical about him being there. Whitney wanted him there as her friend. The only thing that is sad are the people making something out of nothing.

And for the record Hollyoaks and Corrie often have their gay characters attending hen nights. Can't speak for Emmerdale as I don't watch it.”

Thank you. Some people are so desperate to call out homophobia that they don't realise they're imposing very narrow views on what is and isn't allowed.
davejc64
08-10-2016
Originally Posted by Skittle Bomb:
“The scene with Pam and Les was as Pam put it. To show life still goes on.

I'm curious, what exactly is/was your problem with Johnny being there. You haven't actually given a reason.”

That's because I never said I had a problem with it, I just wondered why he was there that's all.

But no doubt you will have already decided I have a problem with it and what that is so I suspect your question was hypothetical anyway.
sw2963
08-10-2016
This thread seems to be going round in circles perhaps. Maybe the question that should have been asked, 'Did you find the Pam & Johnny scene contrived?' 'Or is it a stereotype for a gay man to attend a hen party?'

No to both from me.
Skittle Bomb
08-10-2016
Originally Posted by davejc64:
“That's because I never said I had a problem with it, I just wondered why he was there that's all.

But no doubt you will have already decided I have a problem is and what that is so I suspect your question was hypothetical anyway. ”

I think you must have had a problem with it. You said in the opening post why was he at an all female event. Instead of just asking 'was Johnny there because he is gay' which is what you really wanted to say but didn't.
davejc64
08-10-2016
Originally Posted by _elly001:
“You are the only one saying this. We haven't 'established' anything.”

My bad I should have used 'I' instead of 'we', oh well never mind.
davejc64
08-10-2016
Originally Posted by Skittle Bomb:
“I think you must have had a problem with it. You said in the opening post why was he at an all female event. Instead of just asking 'was Johnny there because he is gay' which is what you really wanted to say but didn't.”

See there you go telling others what they think.

By the way, you are wrong, but don't let that stop you.

So why did you bother to ask me?
vaslav37
08-10-2016
It's very common for gay men to be at their female friends hen nights.
Skittle Bomb
08-10-2016
Originally Posted by davejc64:
“See there you go telling others what they think.

By the way, you are wrong, but don't let that stop you.

So why did you bother to ask me?”

I'm not telling others what to think but its clear you had some sort of issue with him being there from the wording of your opening post.

It took several posts before you mentioned the Pam scene. Not that I'm trying to say you are backtracking but you still haven't actually said what the point is you are trying to make.
LHolmes
08-10-2016
Originally Posted by Skittle Bomb:
“He is cute though so I sort of give him a free pass

Thing is he was brilliant in Casualty where he played a boy who was transgender.”

I think Ted is improving/growing in confidence in the role and is believable as Johnny. It's been nice to see Johnny interacting with more characters in recent episodes.

I'm in disbelief at this thread to be honest. It's like Whitney and Johnny's whole friendship in 2014 is being brushed aside so people can make some sort of negative point about the show.
little-monster
08-10-2016
Johnny has become a poor stereotype. Johnny's scenes are always with females and always eyeing men up. Pretty much like how Christian was prior to his pairing with Syed. Because apparently that is all what gay men do apparently in the eyes of some writers. The writing for Johnny was poor when Sam Strike played him but it has become worse with Robot Ted now in the role. He's is just a Judy Garland film away from not being too different to Sean from corrie.
davejc64
08-10-2016
Originally Posted by Skittle Bomb:
“I'm not telling others what to think but its clear you had some sort of issue with him being there from the wording of your opening post.

It took several posts before you mentioned the Pam scene. Not that I'm trying to say you are backtracking but you still haven't actually said what the point is you are trying to make.”

As I have answered your question already I will refer you to that earlier answer, I know it's not the answer you had already made your mind up about, but since it is the only reason you will have to make do with it so like it or lump it.
omar.
08-10-2016
Because he's a gay character.
LHolmes
08-10-2016
Originally Posted by omar.:
“Because he's a gay character.”

So's Ben who wasn't there.
davejc64
08-10-2016
Originally Posted by LHolmes:
“So's Ben who wasn't there.”

Yeah how mean of them not to invite Ben would have been chance for him and Johnny to hook up. .
UrGleekIsShowin
08-10-2016
This thread is giving me a headache. But it's like a train wreck, I can't look away
Brummy Girl
08-10-2016
Originally Posted by LHolmes:
“So's Ben who wasn't there.”

Whitney wouldn't have invited Ben anyway as it was the same day as his partner's murderers hearing so depending on that outcome he wouldn't have been in the mood for a hen night
<<
<
2 of 4
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map