Originally Posted by Eva_Coco_May:
“It was 2 years ago....producers did that not Fleur herself ”
Sure. And 'Sax' was a year ago and yet we're still getting it featured in every single show like a tedious weekly recurrence of herpes. Doesn't she have any other songs? Is the album so weak and unmemorable that they can't vary their Shameless-Fleur-Placement™ just a tad, if only to spare those of us who don't worship at the altar of mediocrity? I mean stick cardboard cutouts of her face on the dancers for the other acts, uses MK Ultra brainwashing techniques, whatever, just change it up a bit! For Cowell's obsession with what is 'current' he sure does like to flog a dead (and dated) horse.
Originally Posted by jerefprdterra:
“It is hilarious why an element on here get the huff just because some of us like Fleur. If you are not keen on her fair enough. Go and read about an act that you do like instead. Simple really.”
No one here is in a huff apart from possibly you, judging by the petulance apparent in your posts on the first page. We're discussing the irritating overuse of Sax within the show in a pretty light-hearted manner. Just because it happens to be a Fleur song doesn't mean you can shut down all discussion about the show. You are not the Fleur Police. To paraphrase yourself, if you don't like threads about the relentlessly repetitious well-past-its-sell-by-date over-promotion of Sax go read another thread. Simple really.
Originally Posted by jerefprdterra:
“I am very good with my facts thank you very much. As with any promotor Syco is going to promote his acts as much as he can.”
Um. Syco is a company, not a single man. That's a fact. With that in mind you may want to reconsider your initial sentence.