Originally Posted by inothernews:
“It will, in my opinion, only hurt the poorer dancers.
And that is why those who would like to think race isn't an issue (well, in one sense we'd all like to think that) will come back with 'Melvin, Tameka, and Naga weren't that good, so it proves nothing'.
But, (as I said on another thread!!!!) a small percentage (and I really do hope it is a small percentage) will never vote for a black contestant, because they vote BNP (and they have been known to win council seats in the past- at one point one was even a member of the London Assembly) Now, in a tight situation were you have 3 contestants at the bottom, separated by less than 1,000 votes between them, it really could be a difference, because all BNP voters, plus a few (not tarring everyone with the same brush) UKIP supporters are NEVER going to give the black contestant their vote.
That won't be a problem for Ore, as he is good enough that that small percentage of people won't be able to land him in the danger zone. For me, it's too early to know if he deserves to win this year, BUT, if he is good enough, he will win (as in, hopefully not enough BNP type people that could harm his chances) but, in the early stages, with lots of people to vote for (so those in bottom 2 or 3 will have less votes than those in bottom 2 or 3 in, say, 6 weeks time, a small swing could easily be the difference between 3rd bottom, and safe, or dance off.
So- conclusion- If good enough Ore could easily win (not enough BNP type people to stop him), but in early rounds poorer dancers could be disadvantaged over white poor dancers...
And of course, if Ore gets to final week, or even wins, some people will say, 'There you are. Told you there wasn't a problem, and anyone who says there is is just trying to make mischief'.”
“It will, in my opinion, only hurt the poorer dancers.
And that is why those who would like to think race isn't an issue (well, in one sense we'd all like to think that) will come back with 'Melvin, Tameka, and Naga weren't that good, so it proves nothing'.
But, (as I said on another thread!!!!) a small percentage (and I really do hope it is a small percentage) will never vote for a black contestant, because they vote BNP (and they have been known to win council seats in the past- at one point one was even a member of the London Assembly) Now, in a tight situation were you have 3 contestants at the bottom, separated by less than 1,000 votes between them, it really could be a difference, because all BNP voters, plus a few (not tarring everyone with the same brush) UKIP supporters are NEVER going to give the black contestant their vote.
That won't be a problem for Ore, as he is good enough that that small percentage of people won't be able to land him in the danger zone. For me, it's too early to know if he deserves to win this year, BUT, if he is good enough, he will win (as in, hopefully not enough BNP type people that could harm his chances) but, in the early stages, with lots of people to vote for (so those in bottom 2 or 3 will have less votes than those in bottom 2 or 3 in, say, 6 weeks time, a small swing could easily be the difference between 3rd bottom, and safe, or dance off.
So- conclusion- If good enough Ore could easily win (not enough BNP type people to stop him), but in early rounds poorer dancers could be disadvantaged over white poor dancers...
And of course, if Ore gets to final week, or even wins, some people will say, 'There you are. Told you there wasn't a problem, and anyone who says there is is just trying to make mischief'.”
The biggest problem with your hypothesis is the voting system itself.
People vote to save someone. Not to evict. Voting on strictly is a positive choice rather than a negative one.
If you just went on ability I would have save Tamika over Laura, but every other person who lost in the Dance off was the weaker dancer of the two.





”