• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • TV Shows: Reality
  • The Apprentice
As both teams lost, one from each team should have been fired
<<
<
1 of 2
>>
>
Corabal
13-10-2016
Made no sense to just fire one.
Dix
13-10-2016
Originally Posted by Corabal:
“Made no sense to just fire one.”

Think he was about to fire Karthik, but couldn't do it.
Messaroundabit
13-10-2016
All 6 should have gone - they were utterly pathetic.
Grabid Rannies
13-10-2016
It's entirely his prerogative to call out both efforts as equally shit, which they were, but that's not to automatically say that at least one from each side should have been chopped. I think that's an advantage of a non-pecuniary based task.
allafix
13-10-2016
Mukai should have been sacked too. He was terrible. At this early stage I think his Lordship is wary of firing someone who hasn't had a chance to shine and might be very good. That can be the only reason why Karthik survived.
Super_Furry
14-10-2016
The boys should have lost because they didn't fulfil the brief.
The girls at least did that.
Maxatoria
14-10-2016
he's probably saving it up for a tripler down the line but doesn't want to fire too many too soon either.
capekdeh
14-10-2016
Mukai should have been fired.
computermaster
14-10-2016
Just watched on I Player. It looked like Alan was going to fire the Indian guy but I think sheer confidence and self belief saved him for now. The girl that completely cracked up should have probably gone. Amazing that Alan decided not to fire her.
Katenutzs
14-10-2016
Originally Posted by computermaster:
“Just watched on I Player. It looked like Alan was going to fire the Indian guy but I think sheer confidence and self belief saved him for now. The girl that completely cracked up should have probably gone. Amazing that Alan decided not to fire her.”

I agree ... strange decisions by Me Lud to say the least. Big K should have gone too
Matt_Harbinson
14-10-2016
I agree! At least one from each team should have gone based on the outcome; he in affect by firing one person from the woman's team awarded the men's team the win going by the rules of the competition. Mukai, Jessica and Natalie all should have gone in my opinion. Jessica and Mukai should have done well in this task given that is their background in fashion and marketing but they were terrible from time management to branding and video directing, it was all very bad. The men's team last year did brilliantly on the marketing task so hopefully this years crop have some skills in something. 🙄
Nesta Robbins
14-10-2016
I was amazed he didn't fire more last night. He looked more despairing than angry, and I was expecting a major cull!
lightdragon
14-10-2016
I don't think Alana or JD deserved to be brought back, I think Rebecca and Dillon should have had those seats, then fire the lot of them.

It's early doors, but only Samuel and Trish look level headed enough to be potential winners (which probs means next week they get fired).
djfunnyman
14-10-2016
Originally Posted by allafix:
“Mukai should have been sacked too. He was terrible. At this early stage I think his Lordship is wary of firing someone who hasn't had a chance to shine and might be very good. That can be the only reason why Karthik survived.”

Karthik was treated similarly to Steven 2 years ago. Not listened to because they were both irritants

Yeah Mukai should have been fired too. Appalling PM
acid rain
14-10-2016
Originally Posted by allafix:
“Mukai should have been sacked too. He was terrible. At this early stage I think his Lordship is wary of firing someone who hasn't had a chance to shine and might be very good. That can be the only reason why Karthik survived.”


Karthik survived for two reasons.

One - He makes good television. He's the comedy character of the series and stands apart from the others with his distinctive monobrow.

Two - He presumably has a good business plan.
omar.
14-10-2016
The right person went, you could take a good guess and work out Natalie was not going to amount to much during the show. She was a misfit. No gumption no drive or even a show piece. Plus with her thick heavy accent nobody would've taken her seriously anyway unfortunately
BlueEyedMrsP
14-10-2016
Originally Posted by acid rain:
“Karthik survived for two reasons.

One - He makes good television. He's the comedy character of the series and stands apart from the others with his distinctive monobrow.

Two - He presumably has a good business plan.”

Yes, Prince Monobrow will no doubt be a character in upcoming episodes. He's very annoying but also very watchable. His business plan will involve tweezers I hope.
ian_jopson
14-10-2016
Karthik did promise to take on the PM job next week.
chrono88
14-10-2016
I cannot stand Mukai or Karthik any longer.

Was genuinely surprised that wasn't a double firing (or triple. Mukai and Karthik BE GONE)

Yuk
David_Robinson1
14-10-2016
Originally Posted by Corabal:
“As both teams lost, one from each team should have been fired”

I, too, thought he was about to and was disappointed that he didn't...
Maxatoria
14-10-2016
Normally aint the branding challenge a bit later in the series? Its a sort of task that when you need to filter 4-5 people down its a better team task.

And of the two products the Mrs preferred the boys as she said at least it looks pretty and can be of use for the cat to sit in at least.

The roll had no real use in a house generally, would you spend that much effort re-rolling stuff to fit it back into such a container? And also what could you use it for afterwards?
GrayT
15-10-2016
Originally Posted by allafix:
“Mukai should have been sacked too. He was terrible. At this early stage I think his Lordship is wary of firing someone who hasn't had a chance to shine and might be very good. That can be the only reason why Karthik survived.”

Call me a cynic, but I think the truth is that AS and the producers are wary of firing someone who makes good tele. It's no accident that the "quiet" ones go first. And it's nothing to do with business acumen.
lammtarra
15-10-2016
Originally Posted by acid rain:
“Karthik survived for two reasons.

One - He makes good television. He's the comedy character of the series and stands apart from the others with his distinctive monobrow.

Two - He presumably has a good business plan.”

Or maybe Karthik stayed for the less cynical reasons that:

1) irritating though he undoubtedly was, he did not directly mess anything up

2) Lord Sugar has always been a sucker for those who argue their corner most vociferously

3) there were people ahead of Karthik in the queue to be fired

Alana and Jessica probably saved each other -- they both cracked up. If it had been just one, she'd probably have gone.
Cats_Eyes
15-10-2016
Originally Posted by lightdragon:
“I don't think Alana or JD deserved to be brought back, I think Rebecca and Dillon should have had those seats, then fire the lot of them.

It's early doors, but only Samuel and Trish look level headed enough to be potential winners (which probs means next week they get fired).”

He is the best of a very bad lot imo.
Osusana
15-10-2016
Really bad decision making by LS for me, the girls project was marginally less cringeworthy than the boys so at least one boy should have gone.
Cannot argue the case for Natalie, she was terrible in the board room but then so was Alana and she stayed. Did not make any sense to me.
Karthik and/or Mukai should have gone. Rebecca and Alana are both too emotional to stay the distance. None of them will win
<<
<
1 of 2
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map