Originally Posted by Osusana:
“Really bad decision making by LS for me, the girls project was marginally less cringeworthy than the boys so at least one boy should have gone.
Cannot argue the case for Natalie, she was terrible in the board room but then so was Alana and she stayed. Did not make any sense to me.
Karthik and/or Mukai should have gone. Rebecca and Alana are both too emotional to stay the distance. None of them will win”
“Really bad decision making by LS for me, the girls project was marginally less cringeworthy than the boys so at least one boy should have gone.
Cannot argue the case for Natalie, she was terrible in the board room but then so was Alana and she stayed. Did not make any sense to me.
Karthik and/or Mukai should have gone. Rebecca and Alana are both too emotional to stay the distance. None of them will win”
Surely you are right that none can win.
But I'm not sure the girls did better than the boys. As Karren said, their television advert made no sense: in what way are jeans like sushi? And that was before the toilet took away any hint of luxury and the song Shake It Off added unintended humour. The girls' packaging divided the crowd. And while they at least finished their interactive advert for the bus shelter, they forgot to mention the product -- always a red line for Lord Sugar.
Natalie just seemed out of her depth. The obvious retort to the hairdressing charge was that since she is a hairdresser, it would have been churlish game-playing to refuse (and we know Lord Sugar does like people to step up in their own areas). Either Natalie cannot think on her feet or she'd already given up (and perhaps that is the real reason she was fired). After her admission on You're Fired that she'd not watched the show, I am mystified as to why she was even there in the first place.



