Originally Posted by A.D.P:
“The one change ai would make to the show is a bit on the voting.
I think the top 5 or top 50% in the judging points should be given immunity.
It would make:-
The public vote on really who is at risk.
It would cut shock good dancer exits.
It would make dancers abide by rules more and not play on comedy but skill.
Quite often there is a good dancer who everyone thinks us safe but ends up in the dance off.
So at least in the early weeks when we gave a lot of dancers, let the top judges score dancers go straight through, and let us vote on say the 7/8 bottom dancers only.
It would also cut any debate on racism etc...”
“The one change ai would make to the show is a bit on the voting.
I think the top 5 or top 50% in the judging points should be given immunity.
It would make:-
The public vote on really who is at risk.
It would cut shock good dancer exits.
It would make dancers abide by rules more and not play on comedy but skill.
Quite often there is a good dancer who everyone thinks us safe but ends up in the dance off.
So at least in the early weeks when we gave a lot of dancers, let the top judges score dancers go straight through, and let us vote on say the 7/8 bottom dancers only.
It would also cut any debate on racism etc...”
Wow, its like you are reading my mind. Take a look at my thread about Maximizing your Vote. It shows exactly how couples at the top of the leaderboard are completely safe. It also explains how just a few tied judges' scores can put usually safe middle ranking couples at risk, like the week of Laura and Tameka were in the dance off.
I totally agree about the bottom half being subject to a completely fair public vote, with no judges' marks at the point of the public vote. I think that is the best solution. It is the mathematically obvious thing to do. Public favourites are guaranteed safety then.
