DS Forums

 
 

Len's knowledge


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 27-10-2016, 17:31
kaycee
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 8,439
BiB - respect!
(I dare say that it's an Assistant that does the sending, but even so, it's a thoughtful gesture.)
If you knew Len, you would know that he is most likely sending the card himself.
kaycee is offline   Reply With Quote
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 27-10-2016, 17:35
Ann_Dancer
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: London
Posts: 1,663
I think that what irritates most people about Len is not his knowledge but the inconsistent way he applies it - ignoring technical faults in one whereas the same faults are criticised in another.
I think he looks at the whole picture i.e. How that person is developing. So in some cases he might consider it not appropriate to focus too much on a particular fault.

E.g. I think if someone has managed to attain relatively good footwork and action in their leg and body, he might want to give them credit by awarding a high mark, even a 10, since these are collectively difficult to achieve, even though their posture might need developing. He knows that everyone will have a weakness and not be perfect, and so he has to look at the sum of the parts. So it might look as if he is ignoring faults because he hasn't mentioned them, but he will be more interested in how far that person is on the path to becoming a ballroom dancer.
Ann_Dancer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-10-2016, 17:39
kaycee
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 8,439
I agree mostly with what Len says too. The others don't have much of a clue. I find it rather embarrassing to hear what they have to say a lot of the time, as when they critique the technique, they talk a load of rubbish basically. One of my pet hates is Darcy always talking of needing the lady ballroom dancers to bend backwards from the waist....perhaps she should try ! Its rubbish of course, impossible to do and completely wrong.


I couldn't agree more. It is not only completely wrong, it is also dangerous. I guess we've all seen girls/ladies who have been taught in - how can I put it without being offensive? - the lower end, standard wise of, schools, who end up with not only back problems, but also neck and shoulder strains that can last for years.
kaycee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-10-2016, 17:43
hannah 01.
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 3,406
[/b]

I couldn't agree more. It is not only completely wrong, it is also dangerous. I guess we've all seen girls/ladies who have been taught in - how can I put it without being offensive? - the lower end, standard wise of, schools, who end up with not only back problems, but also neck and shoulder strains that can last for years.
Perhaps someone should tell Joanne Clifton
hannah 01. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-10-2016, 18:04
Ann_Dancer
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: London
Posts: 1,663
Perhaps someone should tell Joanne Clifton
Joanne danced WDSF. The WDC, which generally attracts better quality dancers (not saying that Jo is not an exceptionally beautiful dancer though), has always had a problem with some of the extreme shaping of WDSF. Also Joanne bends backwards for stationary lines, not when she is dancing the moving steps which make up the main body of the dance. No good professional would teach their student to bend back from the waist. The correct posture is described here by ex World Champion and adjudicator Anne Gleave. Www.youtube.com/watch?v=SXGJQedn4tM
Ann_Dancer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-10-2016, 18:20
poshnosh
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 933
Bit too much like a pantomime villain.
Oh no he's not!!!
poshnosh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-10-2016, 18:39
Toasted Toad
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 3,283
[/b]

I couldn't agree more. It is not only completely wrong, it is also dangerous. I guess we've all seen girls/ladies who have been taught in - how can I put it without being offensive? - the lower end, standard wise of, schools, who end up with not only back problems, but also neck and shoulder strains that can last for years.
This just puzzles me, because I honestly can't remember her ever saying anything of the sort. I don't remember the word "waist" ever coming out of her mouth. I've seen her show stretching and how to extend the neckline and arm reach (although she might not have time to explain the musculature involved and would, like all the other judges, be relying on the pros to be teaching that to their celebs), but nothing more than that. Perhaps my memory is going. She knows very little about ballroom specifics, although I'm sure is trying to pick it up, but there is nothing she doesn't know about musculature and what is difficult/easy to do and why.

Her training will have caused her to focus a lot on lines and artistry, whereas I believe Len's knowledge/feeling for it is limited. As he has often said, he looks at the footwork. But if you were to tell me that the whole of ballroom is about technique and no more, I would lose all interest in it as a form of artistry (although it does have its weird aspects - doing the waltz while looking away from each other!).

She almost certainly knows more than any of the pros about lifts, as these will not have been part of their formal training (ballroom does not require them - in fact, does not allow them).

However, she won't know a lot about partnering in the ballroom sense, as ballet does not involve those sort of moves. Nor does ballet ever use heel leads. In fact, a large part of the specifics of ballet movement are entirely different to those required in ballroom (people talk of having to 'unlearn' ballet for ballroom purposes). But that does not mean that she is not extremely knowledgeable about the body and would know that certain moves, especially done without proper support from the right muscles, can be dangerous.
Toasted Toad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-10-2016, 20:39
Jennifer_F
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 3,520
This just puzzles me, because I honestly can't remember her ever saying anything of the sort. I don't remember the word "waist" ever coming out of her mouth. I've seen her show stretching and how to extend the neckline and arm reach (although she might not have time to explain the musculature involved and would, like all the other judges, be relying on the pros to be teaching that to their celebs), but nothing more than that. Perhaps my memory is going. She knows very little about ballroom specifics, although I'm sure is trying to pick it up, but there is nothing she doesn't know about musculature and what is difficult/easy to do and why.

Her training will have caused her to focus a lot on lines and artistry, whereas I believe Len's knowledge/feeling for it is limited. As he has often said, he looks at the footwork. But if you were to tell me that the whole of ballroom is about technique and no more, I would lose all interest in it as a form of artistry (although it does have its weird aspects - doing the waltz while looking away from each other!).

She almost certainly knows more than any of the pros about lifts, as these will not have been part of their formal training (ballroom does not require them - in fact, does not allow them).

However, she won't know a lot about partnering in the ballroom sense, as ballet does not involve those sort of moves. Nor does ballet ever use heel leads. In fact, a large part of the specifics of ballet movement are entirely different to those required in ballroom (people talk of having to 'unlearn' ballet for ballroom purposes). But that does not mean that she is not extremely knowledgeable about the body and would know that certain moves, especially done without proper support from the right muscles, can be dangerous.
I agree that she is knowledgeable in areas that she is trained in, no-one has disputed that, but I believe that she should restrict her critique to those areas,...the areas that she has been trained in.

Despite what you seem to imply, Len is trained in lines and artistry, its what we all do in ballroom, many different types of lines ( we don't actually call them lines) in all dances except VW.

There is a saying in Ballroom dancing, that good dancing comes from the floor up. This means that provided you apply correct footwork and technique, you have half a chance to be a good dancer, or better.

Len appears to concentrate mostly on the footwork for a couple of reasons in my opinion. Firstly he is the only one to know the correct footwork and secondly he can hopefully rely on the other judges to pass comment on the visuals, ie topline, arms, hands and lines etc.

There is only so much he can say in the few seconds given him.
Jennifer_F is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-10-2016, 20:47
pasodabble
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Londontown
Posts: 4,769
I don't think Len's all that, most of the professionals are more highly qualified at dance than he is. He's the Gregg Wallace of the dance world, he's made a career out of 'liking stuff and not liking stuff'.

He's not committed to the show that made him, either. Like Paul Hollywood he's followed the money.
One doesn't need to be a highly accomplished dancer to be a great dance teacher or judge. The pros aren't automatically accomplished dance teachers - for some of them fresh from competing this may be their first experience of teaching novices.
pasodabble is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-10-2016, 20:51
Jennifer_F
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 3,520
One doesn't need to be a highly accomplished dancer to be a great dance teacher or judge. The pros aren't automatically accomplished dance teachers - for some of them fresh from competing this may be their first experience of teaching novices.
Very true, all valid points.
Jennifer_F is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-10-2016, 22:31
Toasted Toad
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 3,283
I agree that she is knowledgeable in areas that she is trained in, no-one has disputed that, but I believe that she should restrict her critique to those areas,...the areas that she has been trained in.

Despite what you seem to imply, Len is trained in lines and artistry, its what we all do in ballroom, many different types of lines ( we don't actually call them lines) in all dances except VW.

There is a saying in Ballroom dancing, that good dancing comes from the floor up. This means that provided you apply correct footwork and technique, you have half a chance to be a good dancer, or better.

Len appears to concentrate mostly on the footwork for a couple of reasons in my opinion. Firstly he is the only one to know the correct footwork and secondly he can hopefully rely on the other judges to pass comment on the visuals, ie topline, arms, hands and lines etc.

There is only so much he can say in the few seconds given him.
Agreed. But knowledge of musculature is very much an area she is trained in, which is why I am surprised that some people say she gives advice that could be damaging.

One can argue continuously about artistry (as opposed to technique). I don't think Len knows it from a hole in the ground. Others may disagree vehemently. Where I see a dancer who doesn't have it, there is no amount of technique that will make up for it.

It would be really nice if they could give information or demos as the competition went on showing us what the ideal basic technique (both footwork and shaping) is for the different dances. A lot of the audience want to know, and Len has only a few seconds to say (and often goes for a soundbite rather than anything actually constructive - e.g. Pickling his walnuts). Telling us that someone's footwork was good doesn't get us very far. In what way was it good? Conversely, what would have made it bad? Even on Lens glans he is often still too busy cultivating his onscreen persona to tell us anything useful

Something like that waltz clip someone posted above. Or Jo's informative demos on ITT last year, but done every day. I learned more in a few seconds from her than from the rest of the series. The demos we have had from others, e.g. The Cliftons doing the samba, have been far too skimpy, as they have tried to cover too much ground. I'm sure there's more than enough of the most basic information to last through 3 months (after all, there's 10 dances even without the added extras.) There's plenty of rubbish that could be replaced on ITT with something interesting.
Toasted Toad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28-10-2016, 01:09
chachaclo
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 358
I wish they'd put more dance stuff in the VTs instead of the random crap. I mean the celebs have to learn the steps so why can't they do a little 'this is the basic step for this danc' or 'we're going to work on rise and fall' instead of zorbing...
chachaclo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28-10-2016, 06:33
abivan
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 710
I'm a bit older than you and I found him to be quite fun as a teacher. Not scary at all. We always used to finish off the sessions with March of the Mods.
I was a chubby child (the dance lessons were my mum's idea -but were a nightmare for me). I stood out and was an easy target for criticism.
abivan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28-10-2016, 11:08
Doghouse Riley
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: North-West England
Posts: 25,847
I was a chubby child (the dance lessons were my mum's idea -but were a nightmare for me). I stood out and was an easy target for criticism.
You mean, as you got older it stopped, until like many of us, you started posting on DS?
Doghouse Riley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28-10-2016, 14:40
Cadiva
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: In sunny (hah!) Yorkshire
Posts: 13,940
One doesn't need to be a highly accomplished dancer to be a great dance teacher or judge. The pros aren't automatically accomplished dance teachers - for some of them fresh from competing this may be their first experience of teaching novices.
And irrespective of that anyway, Len is an extremely qualified judge. I happen to agree with the rest of your point just as an aside anyway.
Cadiva is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 28-10-2016, 15:05
fatskia
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 8,563
When Strictly started, I think it suited Len more. They had professionals from a background similar to his and there was more emphasis on learning to dance the 10 dances properly. There always were 'points for entertainment' - which is much less an area of expertise for Len versus the other judges.

Now, the Show has changed, and list of dances has changed. Strictly has introduced some new rules (some of which seem to be secret or made up when needed). There are now dances added to the 10. Props, backing dancers, unsuitable music, unsuitable themes, dogs, cannons, bull riding, getting out of bed. Len is probably qualified more than most on the latter.

Praising Brendan for putting in an illegal lift, to 'make the routine complete'.

Len is still the best judge of the dancing, but I consider Craig as the most consistent judge.
fatskia is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28-10-2016, 16:20
kaycee
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 8,439

One can argue continuously about artistry (as opposed to technique). I don't think Len knows it from a hole in the ground. Others may disagree vehemently. Where I see a dancer who doesn't have it, there is no amount of technique that will make up for it.


.
A good dancer will certainly need to show artistry, but unless he/she has first learnt the correct technique, all the artistry under the sun will not make it a good dance.

As for Len not understanding artistry - it might surprise you that many professional dancers, both ballroom and Latin (including some of the Strictly pros) went to him for lessons to improve their performance and artistry levels.
kaycee is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply




 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:37.