|
||||||||
Week Four: Who Should Have Been Fired? |
| View Poll Results: Who should have been fired? | |||
| Grainne |
|
24 | 26.37% |
| Karthik |
|
6 | 6.59% |
| Mukai |
|
66 | 72.53% |
| Somebody else on the losing team (please specify) |
|
4 | 4.40% |
| Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 91. You can't vote on this poll right now - are you signed in? | |||
![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#26 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: The Rebel County
Posts: 17,761
|
The other team got lucky.
![]() From the losing team though Mukai should have gone, 4 weeks looking baffled is 3 weeks too many. I would have also fired Grainne, what exactly did she do except put people in the wrong places? Then to bring back Karthik for doing nothing wrong. All the mistakes made were her decisions. |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,806
|
Granary bread for being so undecided in the board room.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Titan Uranus
Posts: 31,964
|
Mukai has been lucky to make it this far so I felt the choice was obvious. He's been carefully sneaking his way through since week 1.
Think Rebecca should have been brought back rather than Karthik. Grainne seems quite sensible though. She reminds me of Kristina (series 3), sometimes in both her voice and face, plus they both have that steely determination that Sugar likes. |
|
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 2,092
|
In terms of task performance, it should absolutely have been Grainne. She was fortunate to have had such a great scapegoat in Mukai and she did an excellent job of deflecting her many errors onto him in the boardroom.
I agree with Lord Sugar in that she seems to have "potential", but she was definitely to blame for her team's failure in the task. Plus what she did to Karthik annoyed me. Sidelined him in the task and then brought him back because she "didn't know what to do with him." Essentially, she put him in a position where there was nothing he could to prove himself, so he was going to be brought back regardless. Ridiculous and unfair. |
|
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 5,859
|
Mukai
|
|
|
|
|
|
#31 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 629
|
The other team should have lost and Sofiane should have been fired.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2016
Posts: 85
|
Quote:
The other team should have lost and Sofiane should have been fired.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#33 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 2,764
|
Definitely Mukai. He's been next to useless since the beginning and was living on borrowed time. Grainne had one bad week, but she has huge potential as Sugar said. There are far worse candidates than Grainne left in the competition.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#34 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 9,497
|
Mukai -- two weeks too late! Quote:
The other team should have lost and Sofiane should have been fired.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#35 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 165
|
Quote:
So what would have happened if both teams had chose scarves, I expect one team would have been asked to change.
The fact is the losing team chose to go with handbags they should have made the best of that opportunity and they didn't, they were told that putting someone in the window display had the potential to boost sales they chose not to take that advice that was the difference that caused them to fail so whoever was responsible for making the choice not to do that was the one who caused them to fail to make that extra sale that would have made the difference between winning and losing, I believe that person was the PM so that was who should have been fired. |
|
|
|
|
|
#36 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 2,546
|
Quote:
In terms of task performance, it should absolutely have been Grainne. She was fortunate to have had such a great scapegoat in Mukai and she did an excellent job of deflecting her many errors onto him in the boardroom.
I agree with Lord Sugar in that she seems to have "potential", but she was definitely to blame for her team's failure in the task. Plus what she did to Karthik annoyed me. Sidelined him in the task and then brought him back because she "didn't know what to do with him." Essentially, she put him in a position where there was nothing he could to prove himself, so he was going to be brought back regardless. Ridiculous and unfair. She should have gone imo. |
|
|
|
|
|
#37 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 10
|
lame 'cast'
Is it me, or is this the least colourful collection of contestants there has been to date?
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 12:23.



