DS Forums

 
 

Week Four: Who Should Have Been Fired?


View Poll Results: Who should have been fired?
Grainne 24 26.37%
Karthik 6 6.59%
Mukai 66 72.53%
Somebody else on the losing team (please specify) 4 4.40%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 91. You can't vote on this poll right now - are you signed in?

Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 28-10-2016, 17:38
lightdragon
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: The Rebel County
Posts: 17,761
The other team got lucky.

From the losing team though Mukai should have gone, 4 weeks looking baffled is 3 weeks too many.

I would have also fired Grainne, what exactly did she do except put people in the wrong places? Then to bring back Karthik for doing nothing wrong. All the mistakes made were her decisions.
lightdragon is offline   Reply With Quote
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 28-10-2016, 19:59
mimi123456
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,806
Granary bread for being so undecided in the board room.
mimi123456 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28-10-2016, 20:43
meglosmurmurs
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Titan Uranus
Posts: 31,966
Mukai has been lucky to make it this far so I felt the choice was obvious. He's been carefully sneaking his way through since week 1.

Think Rebecca should have been brought back rather than Karthik.

Grainne seems quite sensible though. She reminds me of Kristina (series 3), sometimes in both her voice and face, plus they both have that steely determination that Sugar likes.
meglosmurmurs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28-10-2016, 23:41
JavarnJohnson
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 2,092
In terms of task performance, it should absolutely have been Grainne. She was fortunate to have had such a great scapegoat in Mukai and she did an excellent job of deflecting her many errors onto him in the boardroom.

I agree with Lord Sugar in that she seems to have "potential", but she was definitely to blame for her team's failure in the task. Plus what she did to Karthik annoyed me. Sidelined him in the task and then brought him back because she "didn't know what to do with him." Essentially, she put him in a position where there was nothing he could to prove himself, so he was going to be brought back regardless. Ridiculous and unfair.
JavarnJohnson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-10-2016, 00:53
JohnStannard
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 5,853
Mukai
JohnStannard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-10-2016, 17:19
Squatch
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 629
The other team should have lost and Sofiane should have been fired.
Squatch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-10-2016, 18:46
jude_le
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Posts: 85
The other team should have lost and Sofiane should have been fired.
THANK YOU
jude_le is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-10-2016, 22:54
Arthur_B
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 2,765
Definitely Mukai. He's been next to useless since the beginning and was living on borrowed time. Grainne had one bad week, but she has huge potential as Sugar said. There are far worse candidates than Grainne left in the competition.
Arthur_B is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-10-2016, 23:05
Luxray
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 9,501
Mukai -- two weeks too late!

The other team should have lost and Sofiane should have been fired.
Or this, yes.
Luxray is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-10-2016, 23:09
zona
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 166
So what would have happened if both teams had chose scarves, I expect one team would have been asked to change.

The fact is the losing team chose to go with handbags they should have made the best of that opportunity and they didn't, they were told that putting someone in the window display had the potential to boost sales they chose not to take that advice that was the difference that caused them to fail so whoever was responsible for making the choice not to do that was the one who caused them to fail to make that extra sale that would have made the difference between winning and losing, I believe that person was the PM so that was who should have been fired.
Honestly said!
zona is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30-10-2016, 16:36
Cats_Eyes
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 2,546
In terms of task performance, it should absolutely have been Grainne. She was fortunate to have had such a great scapegoat in Mukai and she did an excellent job of deflecting her many errors onto him in the boardroom.

I agree with Lord Sugar in that she seems to have "potential", but she was definitely to blame for her team's failure in the task. Plus what she did to Karthik annoyed me. Sidelined him in the task and then brought him back because she "didn't know what to do with him." Essentially, she put him in a position where there was nothing he could to prove himself, so he was going to be brought back regardless. Ridiculous and unfair.
She sure did. Plus Mukai told her many times to get the bags into the window - which was a no - brainer - but she refused.

She should have gone imo.
Cats_Eyes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2016, 10:19
Richard Cantelo
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 10

Is it me, or is this the least colourful collection of contestants there has been to date?
Richard Cantelo is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:00.