|
||||||||
Was Aleksandra right to leave. |
| View Poll Results: Was Aleksandra right to quit? | |||
| Yes - she was right to be true to herself |
|
84 | 76.36% |
| No - she should have stayed and toughed it out |
|
26 | 23.64% |
| Voters: 110. You can't vote on this poll right now - are you signed in? | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 5,201
|
Was Aleksandra right to leave.
The panel has spoken, the audience has spoken - what say you?
|
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 1,400
|
Smart woman.
Leave at the beginning of a task to: - Avoid a knocking from Sugar. - Get some controversy going (rather than leave while at the house). |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,504
|
She was right to go because once you lose focus you're a goner and you might as well cut your losses.
But obviously she should not have applied to be on it in the first place; it's been on long enough that no candidate can claim ignorance of how it works. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: LFLF Research Div
Posts: 49,337
|
Quote:
The panel has spoken, the audience has spoken - what say you?
Unsure which box I'd tick. It's what Doc said which made me think she should have stayed for the Task, and left after that. Maybe the Task was the real reason for leaving, but we'll never know now. So tick whichever box is suitable
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Kingston Upon Thames
Posts: 1,863
|
If she didn't feel like she could carry on then of course she has every right to leave.
HOWEVER, what an absolutely stupid decision to wait until the task had already started to quit. She should have quit in front of Lord Sugar when he was giving the briefing of the task so he could re-adjust the teams accordingly. The way she quit as they had just picked a PM meant she left Grainne and the others up shit creek without a paddle, not at all a well thought-out moment. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,283
|
Quote:
If she didn't feel like she could carry on then of course she has every right to leave.
HOWEVER, what an absolutely stupid decision to wait until the task had already started to quit. She should have quit in front of Lord Sugar when he was giving the briefing of the task so he could re-adjust the teams accordingly. The way she quit as they had just picked a PM meant she left Grainne and the others up shit creek without a paddle, not at all a well thought-out moment. Doubtful that she would have walked if Rebecca had been PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 913
|
None of us can know enough about her, or her personal situation to really have a judgement on whether she timed it right. I'm sure she must have entered the process thinking she could cope with everything and tbh I for one have more respect for someone quitting than those I. The boardroom begging to be kept on.
Maybe she just realized that most of them were acting like a bunch of [fill on your own word] and wanted nothing more to do with it? |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Kingston Upon Thames
Posts: 1,863
|
Quote:
Seemed like a personal thing against Grainne in hindsight, as she also made a catty remark about her on you're fired.
Doubtful that she would have walked if Rebecca had been PM. Conversely, perhaps she'd decided to leave the show mid-week at the candidates' house off-task, but the producers wouldn't allow her to leave off-camera and insisted she at least start the next task before quitting? Either way, definitely horrible timing from Grainne and the others' perspective, you could just feel the panic in that room. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,186
|
Absolutely right to leave.
Absolutely wrong to leave at that moment. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,281
|
It was the most blatant 'producer thought this would look good on TV' moment ever to be honest!
They're obviously not forced against their will to remain in the competition but at the same time they would sit down with the production team for a while first just to confirm they really do want to leave the process, a bit like you see on Big Brother now and again. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Lytham St Annes
Posts: 2,366
|
Quote:
If she didn't feel like she could carry on then of course she has every right to leave.
HOWEVER, what an absolutely stupid decision to wait until the task had already started to quit. She should have quit in front of Lord Sugar when he was giving the briefing of the task so he could re-adjust the teams accordingly. The way she quit as they had just picked a PM meant she left Grainne and the others up shit creek without a paddle, not at all a well thought-out moment. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 34,217
|
Quote:
She was right to go because once you lose focus you're a goner and you might as well cut your losses.
But obviously she should not have applied to be on it in the first place; it's been on long enough that no candidate can claim ignorance of how it works. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: London
Posts: 60
|
Wow I can't believe this board. WHY would you enter a process that's known to be brutal?? On You're Fired she mentioned work life balance? How can you expect this on a show thats been on air FOREVER. Don't apply and waste peoples time if you're going to leave, everyone knows what the process is like.
I believe people should have to start paying a decent amount of money (that's returned at the end/if you're fired). Because being in the industry, having a contestant leave at will is just such a waste of time and resources. DONT APPLY if you can't hack it. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 3,021
|
For all we know she might have told everyone before the task started (even a day before).
The producers might have said 'We need that on film. It'll make a good talking point' Looking back, none of them, including Claude, look that surprised. I think they already knew, so it does feel like we're being a bit manipulated here. I'm surprised nothing was made of the fact that it became 8 v 6, which must have handicapped the losing team (25% less manpower, but they lost the task with just under 20% fewer takings) |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 3,993
|
She got the publicity she desired so it worked.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 68,915
|
Quote:
The panel has spoken, the audience has spoken - what say you?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2016
Posts: 189
|
You last two are absolutely right. It is all too typical of the feminist lobby that they demand education, opportunity etc., but when it doesn't suit them, they can just stop, because they will be away from their kids (she knew that). Give it ten years and she will be back demanding some kind of "equality" for being away for ten years.
It was also a stupid time to go - my answer on manning the window would have been "We were down to six when they had eight". They could not alter the teams as they did not know hat had been said/arranged in the other team by that point. All the business consultants I have ever come across have invariably spent long periods away from home. Funny thing is that I cannot find anything about this company on the Net and it reminds me of many of the previous female candidates, who are now "motivational speakers", "consultants" etc. while living off some boyfriend/husband. |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: An English Village
Posts: 1,551
|
I found her a bit flakey from the off, minimal contribution, constantly whinging.
I imagine she had few allies within the group. For me it wasn't a case of if she would go but when. This group of 'alleged entrepreneurs' are the very worst I have seen on this programme, and there hasn't been a big pool of good candidates down the years, simply a succession of huge ego's and gobs on a stick |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,636
|
She was right to leave, but the way she did it was wrong. Why not just tell them in the house that morning? It was almost as if she was waiting to see what the task was and if she could be bothered.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 4,220
|
I think she signed up to challenge herself and get on telly without realizing the grueling nature of filming and being forced to live with arseholes...I don't blame her for quitting, but I blame her for wasting everyones time by signing up in the first place.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2016
Posts: 85
|
of course she was right to leave, but not when she did. it was completely unfair on the team, which left it to 6 vs 8, which was obviously a major disadvantage for Nebula. she should have either done it in the boardroom, or in the house, at least.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Dream
Posts: 2,797
|
What a waste of space and time. At least she should have tried to tough it out.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 4,220
|
Quote:
of course she was right to leave, but not when she did. it was completely unfair on the team, which left it to 6 vs 8, which was obviously a major disadvantage for Nebula. she should have either done it in the boardroom, or in the house, at least.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,764
|
I fully expected Claude to say something to her like "You'll need to speak to Lord Sugar, first" - Rather like someone being sent to see the headmaster in school!
I was surprised Claude didn't speak to her outside the room, but then, of course, we don't see everything that happens. For the reasons she gave, I believe she was right to leave and have voted accordingly. |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 4,220
|
None of the others cared, one less person to worry about.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 11:15.


