|
||||||||
Is TA one of the most tired shows on TV? |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Scotland
Posts: 5,892
|
Is TA one of the most tired shows on TV?
I started watching The Apprentice during Series 8. The format really hooked me, and honestly the run up to Series 9 was one of the most exciting run-ups to a tv show i recall, and of course Series 9 was incredibly enjoyable - definitely up there with the best series of the show.
However, something's not been right with the last three series - too many candidates may be the issue, but it just seems to have become increasingly stale, repetitive and predictable.. I think the show needs an overhaul if it wants to remain popular - a new board, a new boardroom, between 12 and 14 candidates, turn it back into a job and other things. |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: London
Posts: 895
|
In my opinion they have gone down the old big brother route of turning it into a freak show. Nobody in their right mind would call most of the current clowns Britain's brightest business brains. Personally I would like to see more authentic business minded participants and tasks.
It's never going to happen though and the inclusion of ever greater idiots in the name of entertainment will continue. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 1,400
|
Quote:
I started watching The Apprentice during Series 8. The format really hooked me, and honestly the run up to Series 9 was one of the most exciting run-ups to a tv show i recall, and of course Series 9 was incredibly enjoyable - definitely up there with the best series of the show.
However, something's not been right with the last three series - too many candidates may be the issue, but it just seems to have become increasingly stale, repetitive and predictable.. I think the show needs an overhaul if it wants to remain popular - a new board, a new boardroom, between 12 and 14 candidates, turn it back into a job and other things. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Scotland
Posts: 5,892
|
Quote:
LOL started watching from series 8 and calling it tired.
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 13,706
|
I have loved the Apprentice since the very first series when it was on a quiet graveyard slot on BBC 2 and the lovely Tim won.
This series, however, has been the most difficult to watch and I can't quite put my finger on why. Maybe it's because the tasks are the same every year? Maybe it's because I've lost interest in the business partner stuff? Maybe it's the preposterous candidates that they've managed to dredge up? it's because I'm tired of Karren's stupid faces? I agree with Lojen's point that it's been 'Big Brothered' and turned into a desperate headline grabbing freak show over the past few years. What stumps me the most and has stumped me this year especially, is why on earth people still apply for the show? The show is, essentially, a funfair sideshow of nutters, clueless imbeciles and people-with-a-God-complex. It hasn't been a serious business show for years. It's not like Big Brother where the contestants are vacuous, fame-whores. The people who go on the Apprentice at least have some brains (we're led to believe that anyway!) so why do they still go ahead an apply? Or maybe I'm just being naive and it is more like BB than I think ... |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 4,220
|
It's a tired show, I watch out of loyalty now, but the thrill factor has gone since Sugar's natural wit abandoned him and he relies on written quips provided to him by unfunny writers. The triumvirate of Sugar, Nick and Margaret was a winner, and the show had high standards and values of both production and generally, the quality of the candidates, with the odd village idiot for comic value, now its mainly village idiots with the odd sensible one, slapstick music to denote idiocy, BBC choreographed 'ineptitude' - especially in making candidates look like they know nothing about their chosen profession.
Whoever mentioned Big Brother has it right, as its morphing into something resembling it. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 13,706
|
Quote:
It's a tired show, I watch out of loyalty now, but the thrill factor has gone since Sugar's natural wit abandoned him and he relies on written quips provided to him by unfunny writers. The triumvirate of Sugar, Nick and Margaret was a winner, and the show had high standards and values of both production and generally, the quality of the candidates, with the odd village idiot for comic value, now its mainly village idiots with the odd sensible one, slapstick music to denote idiocy, BBC choreographed 'ineptitude' - especially in making candidates look like they know nothing about their chosen profession.
Whoever mentioned Big Brother has it right, as its morphing into something resembling it. ) that they both left the show when they did. Margaret especially picked her time to leave perfectly as the show was entering its dumbed down phase.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Dream
Posts: 2,797
|
I always thought the 10th series was the worst but this has to take the cake.
YAWN YAWN YAWN |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Scotland
Posts: 5,892
|
The glory days of Series 1-5 are never coming back, I think I just need to accept that. Series 6 didn't really grab my attention: it was quite formulaic in a similar to way it is now. Series 7 was good. Series 8 was dull and tired in hindsight. Series 9 was fantastic - a true return to form, with amazing characters, show firsts and some great candidates. Series 10 was like Series 9, but watered down with too many candidates and also too many annoying ones IMO. Last year was enjoyable, but somewhat dull and extremely gimmicky. This year is the same to be honest except it all just feels so forgettable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 4,220
|
Quote:
The glory days of Series 1-5 are never coming back, I think I just need to accept that. Series 6 didn't really grab my attention: it was quite formulaic in a similar to way it is now. Series 7 was good. Series 8 was dull and tired in hindsight. Series 9 was fantastic - a true return to form, with amazing characters, show firsts and some great candidates. Series 10 was like Series 9, but watered down with too many candidates and also too many annoying ones IMO. Last year was enjoyable, but somewhat dull and extremely gimmicky. This year is the same to be honest except it all just feels so forgettable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 633
|
Replace Sugar.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 4,693
|
I'm finding it a chore.
I think after reading all those stories by Selina and the like of the amount of scripting and editing (which i know in some senses has always been there of course), has made it more noticeable this year just how set up and railroaded the whole thing is. Sugar isn't even that funny or memorable anymore and most of the candidates are just jokes and not even interesting ones at that. Like someone said above I really think they need to take a refresh, a re look and strip back the show. Less editing sabotage, show us a more realistic picture of how tasks unfold even if it isn't "action packed" necessarily with mistakes and errors etc. For example last night, and I maybe completely wrong, but I had the feeling that they were told "don't ask the personal shopper any details about his budget etc", so they could set it up that he only spent £1000. That's the kind of cynical thinking I have with each task now. Just give us transparency, give us actual business minds and business tasks. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 12,020
|
Quote:
I have loved the Apprentice since the very first series when it was on a quiet graveyard slot on BBC 2 and the lovely Tim won.
This series, however, has been the most difficult to watch and I can't quite put my finger on why. Maybe it's because the tasks are the same every year? Maybe it's because I've lost interest in the business partner stuff? Maybe it's the preposterous candidates that they've managed to dredge up? it's because I'm tired of Karren's stupid faces? I agree with Lojen's point that it's been 'Big Brothered' and turned into a desperate headline grabbing freak show over the past few years. What stumps me the most and has stumped me this year especially, is why on earth people still apply for the show? The show is, essentially, a funfair sideshow of nutters, clueless imbeciles and people-with-a-God-complex. It hasn't been a serious business show for years. It's not like Big Brother where the contestants are vacuous, fame-whores. The people who go on the Apprentice at least have some brains (we're led to believe that anyway!) so why do they still go ahead an apply? Or maybe I'm just being naive and it is more like BB than I think ... As for the show, it is getting samey and arguably bound to be a bit tired by now, but still a brilliantly edited classy watchable production imo. Maybe it could do with a couple of years break perhaps, but Im still watching. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 12,020
|
Quote:
Series 6 was a classic for one reason and one reason only - Baggs. Otherwise, yes it wouldn't have been in the class of the first 5 series...but all thats followed has seen a slow decline...but hey, we're all still watching eh?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Guest
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 7,972
|
Quote:
The glory days of Series 1-5 are never coming back, I think I just need to accept that. Series 6 didn't really grab my attention: it was quite formulaic in a similar to way it is now. Series 7 was good. Series 8 was dull and tired in hindsight. Series 9 was fantastic - a true return to form, with amazing characters, show firsts and some great candidates. Series 10 was like Series 9, but watered down with too many candidates and also too many annoying ones IMO. Last year was enjoyable, but somewhat dull and extremely gimmicky. This year is the same to be honest except it all just feels so forgettable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 4,220
|
Quote:
Its still hard to believe Stuart Baggs passed away. Personally I thought the dressing down he got from Lord Sugar when he was eventually fired was way over the top.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Guest
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 7,972
|
Quote:
Massively. That was probably the moment I began to see the show for what it was, They found the flimsiest thing to level at Baggs (lack of a license?) and made out like he was biggest most fraudulent bastard they've ever had when Sugar gave A JOB to Lee McQueen after an admission to falsifying his CV
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 13,706
|
Poor Stuart, such a sad loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 7,312
|
The last enjoyable series for me was series seven (Tom and Helen final two), but it's also the reason I think it's become a bit of a farce.
Changing the prize to an investment rather than a job has ruined it. I'm too cynical to believe that the businesses the candidates put forward haven't been looked at by Alan, his team, the producers etc. making the tasks entirely pointless. Before, if you performed poorly, you were fired. It was straight forward because the prize was a job so there was nothing for Alan to lose. Now, if they have a decent business but perform crap, he's reluctant to get rid of them; so other candidates who maybe have weaker business plans but are performing well lose out. See Tom, for example. He was weak in so many tasks and his time should have been up by halfway, but Alan kept giving him a 'second chance' because he was always going to win regardless of his performance on the tasks. Helen was far superior than Tom; even Alan acknowledged this, but she lost because her business plan was weaker than Tom's - making the entire process pointless for her. Alan was never going to allow her to win / invest in her even if she single-handedly won every task. It was pointless her even competing. And that's why the show is just a mockery that I haven't taken seriously since the change in prize. |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,504
|
There is no logic whatsoever in setting these ludicrously difficult and pressured tasks as part of a "search for a business partner". Nobody in business does such a thing, and certainly Sugar never did when creating Amstrad. It is what it is has always been, a game show and I watch it to be entertained. Yes the format is tired because it is so familiar but it still fascinates me to watch the candidates jump through the hoops even though the odds are so high against them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 13,706
|
Quote:
The last enjoyable series for me was series seven (Tom and Helen final two), but it's also the reason I think it's become a bit of a farce.
Changing the prize to an investment rather than a job has ruined it. I'm too cynical to believe that the businesses the candidates put forward haven't been looked at by Alan, his team, the producers etc. making the tasks entirely pointless. Before, if you performed poorly, you were fired. It was straight forward because the prize was a job so there was nothing for Alan to lose. Now, if they have a decent business but perform crap, he's reluctant to get rid of them; so other candidates who maybe have weaker business plans but are performing well lose out. Helen was far superior than Tom; even Alan acknowledged this, but she lost because her business plan was weaker than Tom's - making the entire process pointless for her. Alan was never going to invest in her even if she single-handedly won every task. It was pointless her even turning up. And that's why the show is just a mockery that I haven't taken seriously since the change in prize. |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 30,890
|
Used to love TA but when they started to pick people who wanted the publicity more than the job and then the tasks followed suit, that was it for me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Guest
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 7,972
|
Quote:
There is no logic whatsoever in setting these ludicrously difficult and pressured tasks as part of a "search for a business partner". Nobody in business does such a thing, and certainly Sugar never did when creating Amstrad. It is what it is has always been, a game show and I watch it to be entertained. Yes the format is tired because it is so familiar but it still fascinates me to watch the candidates jump through the hoops even though the odds are so high against them.
![]() ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Guest
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 7,972
|
Quote:
Used to love TA but when they started to pick people who wanted the publicity more than the job and then the tasks followed suit, that was it for me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 7,312
|
Quote:
I agree that the link between the tasks and the outcome has been rendered pointless by the business investment. It's basically down to the last two shows and whether Shugs likes the business idea or not - whether he has any interest in the individual is almost irrelevant. We've seen him favour people who, on paper have been weaker candidates simply because Shugs feels like their business proposition is a 'goer'.
Then there's the whole inconsistency thing with people being fired, too. One week he's firing people because they're not doing anything / hiding, the next he's letting people off who have zero sales in a sales task, whilst someone who's clearly contributed gets the boot. I understand there needs to be a balance between those doing nothing and those doing too much / messing up, but there's absolutely no balance - it's all over the place. It all seems too contrived now, it's just a case of letting the 'interesting' personalities remain regardless of their performance. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 12:20.



)
) that they both left the show when they did. Margaret especially picked her time to leave perfectly as the show was entering its dumbed down phase.
