• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Soaps
ED- Ross owning Charity
<<
<
3 of 5
>>
>
Glendarroch
29-10-2016
Charity deserved a lot of what Ross said - not about her sexual activities but the stuff about her being a poor mother ( which in ED land is the worst ' crime' you can commit, far worse than attempted murder). Clearly she was also attempting to use him to make Cain jealous!

However, she was at a very low ebb, so his reducing her even further was horrible.
Glendarroch
29-10-2016
Duplicate
sorcha_healy27
29-10-2016
Originally Posted by trevon1:
“It's not about excusing Chrissie. It's about excusing Robert and Ross for doing worse and having a double standard for female characters. We seem to throw around terms like bitch pretty easily when it comes to Chrissie but not so much when it comes to Robert and Ross who get hero worshipped for doing similar things to Chrissie.”

Chrissie seems to be getting excuses made for her. It's nothing to do with the gender issue.

People like who they like. I loved Kim for example who was truly a villain but I don't like Cain who is also a villain.
Silent-Tears
29-10-2016
Originally Posted by Mark_Washingto1:
“Ugh, I haven't seen it yet but I don't like how it sounds. I need Charity to be back on top.”

I think it was Ross on top actually lol
sorcha_healy27
29-10-2016
Originally Posted by Silent-Tears:
“I think it was Ross on top actually lol ”

Nico_D
29-10-2016
Originally Posted by trevon1:
“It's not about excusing Chrissie. It's about excusing Robert and Ross for doing worse and having a double standard for female characters. We seem to throw around terms like bitch pretty easily when it comes to Chrissie but not so much when it comes to Robert and Ross who get hero worshipped for doing similar things to Chrissie.”

I think it's just the terminology that's diffrent, Robert and Ross often referred to as a bastards and are liked and loathed in equal measure. People dislike chrissie at the mi ute is because she is so limp, she crumbles and bursts into tears whenever anyone retaliates.
Whedonite
29-10-2016
Originally Posted by sorcha_healy27:
“Plenty of people call him a skank same with Cain.”

Do they? I can't say I see it all that often, if at all. I see it with the female characters all the time though.
sorcha_healy27
29-10-2016
Originally Posted by Whedonite:
“Do they? I can't say I see it all that often, if at all. I see it with the female characters all the time though.”

Well just because you don't see it doesn't mean it hasn't been said.

I dislike charity as a character regardless of her gender. I also strongly dislike Cain.

I love Emma and Ross. It's irrelevant whether they're male or female.

A decent character is a decent character.
Mormon Girl
29-10-2016
Originally Posted by sorcha_healy27:
“Well just because you don't see it doesn't mean it hasn't been said.

I dislike charity as a character regardless of her gender. I also strongly dislike Cain.

I love Emma and Ross. It's irrelevant whether they're male or female.

A decent character is a decent character.”

Do you think Emma Atkins and Jeff Hordley can act? Are we still friends on here? Do you look at your PMs on here
sorcha_healy27
29-10-2016
Originally Posted by Mormon Girl:
“Do you think Emma Atkins and Jeff Hordley can act? Are we still friends on here? Do you look at your PMs on here”

Yes I think both Emma and Jeff are wonderful actors. You don't have to like a character to recognise someone playing that character is a good actor mg.

As anyone will tell you I'm terrible at reading my pms
Mormon Girl
29-10-2016
Originally Posted by sorcha_healy27:
“Yes I think both Emma and Jeff are wonderful actors. You don't have to like a character to recognise someone playing that character is a good actor mg.

As anyone will tell you I'm terrible at reading my pms ”

If you were producer promise me you wouldn't axe Charity and Cain and write Charity better? Do you think Charity and Cain have good banter? Do you prefer Charity and Cain as friends who can also support Debbie? Do you think Emma and Jeff have good onscreen chemistry, Did you like Charity and Cain together in 2003, 2004, 2009 and 2010?
scone
29-10-2016
Let's hope she isn't pregnant again and uses it as an excuse to claim it's Cain's child. We all know Ross is extremely potent
samcains90
29-10-2016
Originally Posted by Whedonite:
“Do they? I can't say I see it all that often, if at all. I see it with the female characters all the time though.”

There's a lot of girl on girl crime going on. Inside and outside of the soap.

If there's any reason at all it's because they've crossed a favourite male character or slept with him.

In a ot of fiction the favourite characters are usually male regardless whether they are or are not the main protagonist. Women are oftentimes used as catalysts for events beyond their control.
sorcha_healy27
29-10-2016
Originally Posted by samcains90:
“There's a lot of girl on girl crime going on. Inside and outside of the soap.

If there's any reason at all it's because they've crossed a favourite male character or slept with him.

In a ot of fiction the favourite characters are usually male regardless whether they are or are not the main protagonist. Women are oftentimes used as catalysts for events beyond their control.”

I tend to disagree as regards soap Sam.

Emmerdale's most beloved characters are female. Zoe, Kim, Lady Tara and the likes are legendary characters.

I think it's ridiculous thst the gender card is being played here. This isn't reality. Obviously there is terrible double standards about male and female behaviour on real life but i don't think it's the case as regards charity and the likes..
cyrilandshirley
29-10-2016
Originally Posted by Whedonite:
“People even blamed her for Rakesh's problems and cheered him for physically attacking her. The comments on Youtube were disturbing.”

Quelle surprise.

Originally Posted by sorcha_healy27:
“To be honest Cyril it's nothing to do with misogyny. Robert has done bad stuff to many people..

Chrissie got Andy blamed for shooting Lawrence to protect her sex pest son and because she was pissed off he cheated on her.

Is she to be excused for her actions because of her gender?”

Robert has done bad stuff to a lot of people, I agree. What's misogynist (to me) is that the way the whole story has been twisted by the show, they're portraying Bobby and his dull paramour as in some way having done Chrissie a favour by screwing behind her back then throwing it in her face. Instead of portraying them as the hateful self-indulgent cheating lying cockwombles that they are.

I don't excuse Chrissie's actions at all - they've turned her into a bit of a cartoon bitch for the sake of Andy's exit, she's pretty much irredeemable (though still reasonably fun to watch). But it's been done to play to the Saint Bobby and Wifey storyline - she's been made evil so it excuses what they did. I find it all a bit daft to be honest. But I sure do hate Robert now. What an absolute prick. I hope someone smacks his smug head off his shoulders.
sorcha_healy27
29-10-2016
Originally Posted by cyrilandshirley:
“Quelle surprise.



Robert has done bad stuff to a lot of people, I agree. What's misogynist (to me) is that the way the whole story has been twisted by the show, they're portraying Bobby and his dull paramour as in some way having done Chrissie a favour by screwing behind her back then throwing it in her face. Instead of portraying them as the hateful self-indulgent cheating lying cockwombles that they are.

I don't excuse Chrissie's actions at all - they've turned her into a bit of a cartoon bitch for the sake of Andy's exit, she's pretty much irredeemable (though still reasonably fun to watch). But it's been done to play to the Saint Bobby and Wifey storyline - she's been made evil so it excuses what they did. I find it all a bit daft to be honest. But I sure do hate Robert now. What an absolute prick. I hope someone smacks his smug head off his shoulders.”

You're really eloquent Cyril and I totally respect what you're saying


As regards the Rakesh situation he was in a terrible mental state and was on the brink because of Chrissie's actions. No he shouldn't have attacked her but I highly doubt there'd be such condemnation about Chrissie attacking rakesh if the situations were reversed.

Even in poldark Demelza hit Ross and was applauded for her violence yet had he done that to her there'd have been outrage.
samcains90
29-10-2016
Originally Posted by sorcha_healy27:
“I tend to disagree as regards soap Sam.

Emmerdale's most beloved characters are female. Zoe, Kim, Lady Tara and the likes are legendary characters.

I think it's ridiculous thst the gender card is being played here. This isn't reality. Obviously there is terrible double standards about male and female behaviour on real life but i don't think it's the case as regards charity and the likes..”

Oh don't get me wrong, soap characters tend to push the boundaries and female characters are mostly certainly catalysts for their own stories.

Ross is most definitely the type of character to use such language, and have double standards.

But look at the way Robert is so revered for putting Chrissie down and using his "wiles" to lure Rebecca into betraying her family.
Meanwhile, Rebecca is getting slaughtered for using her "wiles" to try and seduce Robert.

I think though, in soaps there's a good balance of nice male and female characters and naughty male and female characters. It's more the audience language that brings up such discussion.
trevor tiger
29-10-2016
Originally Posted by trevon1:
“I agree. In fact, I feel there has been a lot of sexism in Emmerdale lately with the female characters always getting made fools of by men. First Robert to Chrissie and now Ross to Charity. Can we see a woman getting the upper hand for once?”

I love Robert and Ross and cannot stand Charity or Chrissie BUT I actually agree with the bib. It does seem rather loaded against the females at the moment. We need a woman that can hold their own against these men but there just doesn't seem one around currently. Charity would have seemed the ideal candidate but she has become a needy wreck and is just not up to the job. Chrissie has always been more of an annoying spoilt princess that caves at the first sign of any resistance so would never be up to the job.

One thing I would say however in favour of the characters of Robert and Ross saying what they did when they did is that in Robert's case Chrissie unnecessarily pushed him. He said 'not now' but she followed him and pushed him to respond so he lashed out like only Robert can and it was funny well I thought so. Also, with Ross, Charity blatantly used him so she too in a sense had it coming.

Maybe it's just about timing with these 2 outbursts being so close to each other. Still it has drawn attention to the lack of a strong woman that isn't just desperate for a man
sorcha_healy27
29-10-2016
Originally Posted by samcains90:
“Oh don't get me wrong, soap characters tend to push the boundaries and female characters are mostly certainly catalysts for their own stories.

Ross is most definitely the type of character to use such language, and have double standards.

But look at the way Robert is so revered for putting Chrissie down and using his "wiles" to lure Rebecca into betraying her family.
Meanwhile, Rebecca is getting slaughtered for using her "wiles" to try and seduce Robert.

I think though, in soaps there's a good balance of nice male and female characters and naughty male and female characters. It's more the audience language that brings up such discussion.”

Good points Sam

I don't think Robert puts Chrissie down out of anything other than the fact that they loathe each other now in fairness.

I also don't think Rebecca is being slaughtered but I think it's predictable that they had the women fighting each other over
Robert. It's very clichéd is what it is.
SULLA
29-10-2016
Originally Posted by sorcha_healy27:
“To be honest Cyril it's nothing to do with misogyny. Robert has done bad stuff to many people..

Chrissie got Andy blamed for shooting Lawrence to protect her sex pest son and because she was pissed off he cheated on her.

Is she to be excused for her actions because of her gender?”

No. She is to be excused because it was Slugden.
sorcha_healy27
29-10-2016
Originally Posted by SULLA:
“No. She is to be excused because it was Slugden.”



I suppose it's all Robert's fault Andy shagged Bernice too. Nothing is ever Chrissie's fault
Coldwater2020
29-10-2016
Quote:
“ Chrissie seems to be getting excuses made for her. It's nothing to do with the gender issue.”

I agree. I'm not the least bit interested in this feud between Robert and the Whites because as far as I'm concerned it just makes everyone involved look bad, but we're clearly supposed to understand Chrissie's motivations for framing Andy because she's been hard done by by the men in her life and she was protecting Lucky as if either of those things justifies setting someone up for a life sentence in prison. And enough people dislike Andy to think he deserved everything she did to him.

Quote:
“ I don't excuse Chrissie's actions at all - they've turned her into a bit of a cartoon bitch for the sake of Andy's exit, she's pretty much irredeemable (though still reasonably fun to watch). But it's been done to play to the Saint Bobby and Wifey storyline - she's been made evil so it excuses what they did.”

I doubt it was done to make Robert and Aaron more forgivable or popular since they were already very popular and clearly forgiven despite everything and giving Chrissie a personality change hasn't really affected that. If anything it feels like the writers thought it would make her a more interesting and popular character because people love a good bitch . I mean Charity is popular despite how awful she can be and Kim Tate was very popular so they obviously understand the appeal of the Soap Bitch. Whether they've been successful is another story.
ianradioian
29-10-2016
Originally Posted by sorcha_healy27:
“I tend to disagree as regards soap Sam.

Emmerdale's most beloved characters are female. Zoe, Kim, Lady Tara and the likes are legendary characters.

I think it's ridiculous thst the gender card is being played here. This isn't reality. Obviously there is terrible double standards about male and female behaviour on real life but i don't think it's the case as regards charity and the likes..”

Zoe, Kim and Lady Tara were great ED characters

But; if course; the best-and iconic was Ma Sugden, played by Sheila Mercier ( still with us )
samcains90
29-10-2016
Originally Posted by Coldwater2020:
“I agree. I'm not the least bit interested in this feud between Robert and the Whites because as far as I'm concerned it just makes everyone involved look bad, but we're clearly supposed to understand Chrissie's motivations for framing Andy because she's been hard done by by the men in her life and she was protecting Lucky as if either of those things justifies setting someone up for a life sentence in prison. And enough people dislike Andy to think he deserved everything she did to him.



I doubt it was done to make Robert and Aaron more forgivable or popular since they were already very popular and clearly forgiven despite everything and giving Chrissie a personality change hasn't really affected that. If anything it feels like the writers thought it would make her a more interesting and popular character because people love a good bitch . I mean Charity is popular despite how awful she can be and Kim Tate was very popular so they obviously understand the appeal of the Soap Bitch. Whether they've been successful is another story.”

I don't believe for a second that Chrissie's actions are meant to be justified, the majority of the audience hate her. A portion of that coming from the fact that she was the Gorgon standing in the way of Robert & Aaron's being together.

To turn her into a bitch only suits to grow the hatred of that character not diminish it by making her popular.
sorcha_healy27
29-10-2016
Originally Posted by samcains90:
“I don't believe for a second that Chrissie's actions are meant to be justified, the majority of the audience hate her. A portion of that coming from the fact that she was the Gorgon standing in the way of Robert & Aaron's being together.

To turn her into a bitch only suits to grow the hatred of that character not diminish it by making her popular.”

You have a point about her being turned into villain of the year Sam

I really liked Chrissie when she arrived in the village especially when she felt so terrible in the aftermath of the crash and took responsibility for her actions

Since then she's been turned into a panto villain.
<<
<
3 of 5
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map