Originally Posted by sorcha_healy27:
“None of this makes her a gold digger though and that wasn't the point that was being made..”
To be fair Sorcha, I never actually called her a gold digger. I said it won't help her cause with those who believe that of her. She did come across as entitled tonight and made no mention of what she's already had which could've given her and Denny a future.
Historically Sharon isn't a gold digger (the Mitchell bruvs helped her buy the Vic in the 90s but she was in love with Grant and I don't think the money really crossed her mind, she wanted the Vic out of love for the place not for security) but characters nowadays are at the mercy of producer whims some of which can be left field from how they were written originally. SOC has been better at characterisation than DTC but tonight was a blip for Sharon it seems. It did seem she was looking after her own interests. Yes she argued the point about Ben's sexuality but when push came to shove she was happy to settle for only her and Denny's inclusion in the will and looked pretty smug about it.
There's also the fact people change depending on life's circumstances. Sharon's been at rock bottom before that's bound to change how much value she places in £. I still wouldn't generally class Sharon as a gold digger but it's been a recurring thread in this stint. I remember a scene in 2014 where she was gloating over a drunk Shirley in Phil's house and made it clear she didn't care about Phil and that Denny was her only priority.
Not the same as saying she's a gold digger (so bringing up John from 2012 etc is irrelevant as TPTB obvs had different ideas for Sharon then than making her independent again) but I do think putting Sharon with Phil in 2013 was seen as a quick fix to getting the character out of the gutter.