• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Soaps
EE: Sharon the gold digger
<<
<
1 of 16
>>
>
J-B
31-10-2016
Tonight proved Sharon to be the scrounging gold digger we all know her to be. Trying to screw Phil's kids out of their inheritance like that.

Horrid woman. If Phil dies she'll have found yet another bloke to scrounge off within a few weeks.

Thanks.
soap-lea
31-10-2016
Couldn't agree more, I am disgusted at her behaviour
jamesc_715
31-10-2016
I'm pleased she lectured Phil for leaving Ben out of the will because it's out of order not giving Ben any assets. But yes she wanted money.
soap-lea
31-10-2016
Originally Posted by jamesc_715:
“I'm pleased she lectured Phil for leaving Ben out of the will because it's out of order not giving Ben any assets. But yes she wanted money.”

Yet she just made him change the will and Ben's still not in it!
J-B
31-10-2016
Harassing a dying man into letting her get her grasping hands on his money... sickening.

It's demonstrably got nothing to do with Ben, it's all about her and her horrible son.
jamesc_715
31-10-2016
Originally Posted by soap-lea:
“Yet she just made him change the will and Ben's still not in it!”

That's true. I agree she wanted money but as his wife, I also think she was hurt he didn't include her in the will.
sorcha_healy27
31-10-2016
Sharon isn't a gold digger.
Phil has treated her like an unpaid babysitter /secretary/crisis sorter for years and even after Ben and him reconcile he still can't even accept his sexuality.

Leaving all the money to Louise is frankly ludicrous.
bass55
31-10-2016
Let's get a few things straight.

Firstly, Sharon isn't and has never been a gold digger. If she wanted money she could have married John in 2012, or she could have fleeced Phil in 2014. She did neither.

Secondly, Phil leaving his entire estate to a 14 year old girl is thoughtless and irresponsible. He has a son and wife to think of too. Sharon has put up with a hell of a lot of shit from Phil, and has looked after his businesses and his children in the process. It was she that made the Albert a success. Why shouldn't she ensure her own financial security (and Denny's) in the event of Phil's death? Are we all going to pretend that if we were in Sharon's situation we would have said nothing? Ridiculous.

But this is DS and it's Sharon, so the faux outrage begin.
sorcha_healy27
31-10-2016
Typical of Phil to shit all over those who've stood by him
soap-lea
31-10-2016
Originally Posted by bass55:
“Let's get a few things straight.

Phil leaving his entire estate to a 14 year old girl is thoughtless and irresponsible. He has a son and wife to think of too. Sharon has put up with a hell of a lot of shit from Phil, and has looked after his businesses and his children in the process. It was she that made the Albert a success. Why shouldn't she ensure her own financial security (and Denny's) in the event of Phil's death? Are we all going to pretend that if we were in Sharon's situation we would have said nothing? Don't be so ridiculous.

Let the faux outrage begin.”

Phil gave Sharon his half of the Albert. It is not his fault she gave it away and it is her fault that she has no financial security.

Plus she arrived back in the square a few yrs ago without a penny to her name and latched onto Phil for the security.

It's non of her business who he leaves his money too
AcerBen
31-10-2016
I don't understand why Phil decided to leave them out of the will in the first place, it makes no sense
jamesc_715
31-10-2016
Originally Posted by sorcha_healy27:
“Typical of Phil to shit all over those who've stood by him”

Indeed. I'm appalled Ben is left out of the will and Phil knows Ben is planning to donate part of his liver to him.
bass55
31-10-2016
Originally Posted by soap-lea:
“Phil gave Sharon his half of the Albert. It is not his fault she gave it away and it is her fault that she has no financial security.

Plus she arrived back in the square a few yrs ago without a penny to her name and latched onto Phil for the security.

It's non of her business who he leaves his money too”

Sharon returning penniless in 2012 was terrible continuity. When she left in 2006 she had just sold the Vic and her house, as well as the club. Realistically she would have been a millionaire. Then it disappeared without any explanation.

It was Sharon who slogged her guts out in the R&R and later the Albert to make it a success. She wasn't just handed the business on a plate.

Of course it's Sharon's business who her husband leaves his estate to. She's not some nobody off the street. They're married.
sorcha_healy27
31-10-2016
Originally Posted by soap-lea:
“Phil gave Sharon his half of the Albert. It is not his fault she gave it away and it is her fault that she has no financial security.

Plus she arrived back in the square a few yrs ago without a penny to her name and latched onto Phil for the security.

It's non of her business who he leaves his money too”

It's exactly her business given the amount of shite she's had to deal with from him

The businesses kept running because of her

His family kept together because of her

And all when Phil was drinking himself to death

Of course it's her business

Giving everything to Louise and nothing to Ben is petty and spiteful
Whoopie Doo
31-10-2016
All this hate for Sharon how do you think Ben would feel about being left out? would he be branded a gold digger too? he has given Phil a granddaughter, a grandchild Phil seems to have forgot existed. What about her future?

Totally team Sharon on this one. Phil has only really known Louise for something like 9 months with a brief few months in 2010 while Ben has spent most of his life living with Phil.
LHolmes
31-10-2016
If it was about doing the right thing she'd have fought Ben's corner as well not just her own.
bean_of_sb
31-10-2016
Of course she wants stability! She is is his wife and with that surely comes financial security should he die? She has a son to look after and she will be the one Louise and Ben turn to when Phil dies, not their mothers.
soap-lea
31-10-2016
Originally Posted by sorcha_healy27:
“It's exactly her business given the amount of shite she's had to deal with from him

The businesses kept running because of her

His family kept together because of hero

And all when Phil was drinking himself to death

Of course it's her business

Giving everything to Louise and nothing to Ben is petty and spiteful”

I agree leaving to Louise and not Ben is spiteful.

Ppl are forgetting that Sharon was divorcing Phil till she found out he was dying..
J-B
31-10-2016
I'll expect apologies from all of you who said I was wrong to label Sharon a scrounging gold digger in short order.
Sora2311
31-10-2016
It's obvious he's left Ben out of his will so Ben feels pissed off and doesn't want to give him part of his liver
sorcha_healy27
31-10-2016
Originally Posted by J-B:
“I'll expect apologies from all of you who said I was wrong to label Sharon a scrounging gold digger in short order.”

Well you won't get one from me
Foxster Hotpot
31-10-2016
I agreed with what Sharon was saying to Phil about how wrong it was to cut Ben out, but weirdly we then had the scene with Ritchie where she acted like she didnt care what happened to Ben's inheritance once she had got her own position sorted.
soap-lea
31-10-2016
Originally Posted by AcerBen:
“I don't understand why Phil decided to leave them out of the will in the first place, it makes no sense”

Originally Posted by Whoopie Doo:
“All this hate for Sharon how do you think Ben would feel about being left out? would he be branded a gold digger too? he has given Phil a granddaughter, a grandchild Phil seems to have forgot existed. What about her future?

Totally team Sharon on this one. Phil has only really known Louise for something like 9 months with a brief few months in 2010 while Ben has spent most of his life living with Phil.”


Both issues were covered in the episode
Harlowe
31-10-2016
Originally Posted by soap-lea:
“Phil gave Sharon his half of the Albert. It is not his fault she gave it away and it is her fault that she has no financial security.

Plus she arrived back in the square a few yrs ago without a penny to her name and latched onto Phil for the security.

It's non of her business who he leaves his money too”

Why she may of overacted, it her her business, they are married and I think any wife would be a little miff that he leave he whole asset to a 14 year old girl without at least discussing it with her, she by he side, in his bed and running his businesses and household, looking after his kids, he chose to marry her, so yes it her business.
sorcha_healy27
31-10-2016
Originally Posted by soap-lea:
“I agree leaving to Louise and not Ben is spiteful.

Ppl are forgetting that Sharon was divorcing Phil till she found out he was dying..”

And she called off the divorce because she was being a decent human being and supporting Phil.
<<
<
1 of 16
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map