• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Soaps
EE: Sharon the gold digger
<<
<
3 of 16
>>
>
Whoopie Doo
31-10-2016
I just remembered something. Did Roxy ever find out Phil and Shirley stole most of her money? perhaps he should have included Roxy in the will for Amy's future.
jamesc_715
31-10-2016
I'm surprised Rob Gittins wrote tonight's episode because he's the longest serving writer. But I shouldn't be too surprised because he was the one who wrote the 'Hello Princess' retcon.
bass55
31-10-2016
Originally Posted by priscilla:
“Most are just expressing on what was shown, from her angry outburst to not being included, forcing Phil to change it there and then and finally that smirk when he signed it to me was a gold digger.
Her and Philth were over, and its coming across as if she only meddled her way back into the Mitchells so she could be rewarded with some cash after Philth's liver rots away and he dies.”

I've despaired at Sharon plenty of times in this stint, and there have been plenty of times where her behaviour has been totally out of order. I don't understand the outrage with this one. She's ensuring that she and her son aren't left penniless/homeless after her husband's death, the husband who has put her through a lot of emotional and physical trauma, and whose businesses and children she has been looking after while he has been drinking himself to death. Nobody in that situation would have sat back and said nothing while Phil left everything to a child.
vald
31-10-2016
Originally Posted by Whoopie Doo:
“I just remembered something. Did Roxy ever find out Phil and Shirley stole most of her money? perhaps he should have included Roxy in the will for Amy's future.”

Yes she found out but he'd already put the money back. Ronnie stole £100.000 off him to pay him back....not that she gave any to Roxy. That's Mitchells for you.
Harlowe
31-10-2016
Originally Posted by bass55:
“I've despaired at Sharon plenty of times in this stint, and there have been plenty of times where her behaviour has been totally out of order. I don't understand the outrage with this one. She's ensuring that she isn't left penniless after her husband's death, the husband who has put her through a lot of emotional and physical traumtraund whose businesses and children she has been looking after while he has been drinking himself to death. Nobody in that situation would have sat back and said nothing while Phil left everything to a child.”

This how I view it, why the smirking didn't do her any favours, Phil is yet again making a decision, a big life changing decision without involving her, at least discussing it, cutting not just her but Ben out show such little disregard or actually putting any thought into it.
priscilla
31-10-2016
Originally Posted by bass55:
“I've despaired at Sharon plenty of times in this stint, and there have been plenty of times where her behaviour has been totally out of order. I don't understand the outrage with this one. She's ensuring that she isn't left penniless after her husband's death, the husband who has put her through a lot of emotional and physical trauma. And whose businesses and children she has been looking after while he has been drinking himself to death. Nobody in that situation would have sat back and said nothing while Phil left everything to a child.”

Sharon should have never went back to him after he attacked her, she should have went through with taking his money. To go back to him, play happy families, then split up and go back again when he's a deaths door just comes across as a gold digger. I understand that you think she should be given something but the way it was written for me it didn't really show her in a good light.
The stuff she was saying about Ben was true, but I think that was overshadowed with her making Phil change it immediately.
Whoopie Doo
31-10-2016
Originally Posted by vald:
“Yes she found out but he'd already put the money back. Ronnie stole £100.000 off him to pay him back....not that she gave any to Roxy. That's Mitchells for you.”

So if Phil paid Roxy back her 3 million why does she never have any money? Does Roxy know about Shirley's involvement?
EE_springer
31-10-2016
Originally Posted by bass55;84410612...Of course it's Sharon's business who her [B:
“husband[/b] leaves his estate to. She's not some nobody off the street. They're married.”

Are they? I seem to remember the divorce was granted, which is why is has confused me that Sharon is still calling herself Phil's wife. Did the divorce not go through?
J-B
31-10-2016
Originally Posted by sorcha_healy27:
“The writing for Sharon is truly appalling. Any longstanding viewer regardless of whether they like sharon or not knows full well she isn't a gold digger.

Sean o connor seems to be continuing in this vein which is all wrong.”

So she isn't a gold digger, apart from the writing, the multiple examples of gold digging since her return, and her characterisation
jamesc_715
31-10-2016
Originally Posted by EE_springer:
“Are they? I seem to remember the divorce was granted, which is why is has confused me that Sharon is still calling herself Phil's wife. Did the divorce not go through? ”

No it never went ahead and they didn't get the decree absolute. They are still married.
soap-lea
31-10-2016
Originally Posted by Whoopie Doo:
“So if Phil paid Roxy back her 3 million why does she never have any money? Does Roxy know about Shirley's involvement?”

Cos he stole her last 20k and not 3mill
Harlowe
31-10-2016
Originally Posted by Whoopie Doo:
“So if Phil paid Roxy back her 3 million why does she never have any money? Does Roxy know about Shirley's involvement?”

He only stole 20k I think, cause she needed it to pay for Ronnie's first wedding. to Jack

He did a lot of dodgy work to pump his money up.

She knows about it , Shirley gets off scot free 90% of the time, its mostly swept under the carpet, Ronnie blackmail him for 100k and to get rid of Nick and the money got burnt.

She apparently spent all of her money, that's why she not had a proper job in 4 years until recently.
rosiedevon
31-10-2016
Originally Posted by EE_springer:
“Are they? I seem to remember the divorce was granted, which is why is has confused me that Sharon is still calling herself Phil's wife. Did the divorce not go through? ”

I thought that too.
priscilla
31-10-2016
Is Phil, Richie's only client?? Lool she was there and soon as he called with the changed Will. If that was me, I would have seen it as a bit iffy, guy in hospital will die in a few months or weeks, ex wife or wife (forget what sharon is now) there making sure it is signed.
vald
31-10-2016
Originally Posted by Whoopie Doo:
“So if Phil paid Roxy back her 3 million why does she never have any money? Does Roxy know about Shirley's inveolvement?”

They only stole £20,000, she blew the rest herself😏
Whoopie Doo
31-10-2016
So Roxy blew 3 million in six months? !!!

EastEnders has always been so unrealistic. No wonder its considered the joke soap.
vald
31-10-2016
Originally Posted by priscilla:
“Is Phil, Richie's only client?? Lool she was there and soon as he called with the changed Will. If that was me, I would have seen it as a bit iffy, guy in hospital will die in a few months or weeks, ex wife or wife (forget what sharon is now) there making sure it is signed.”

Maybe he tore up the second will the minute Sharon left.
Whoopie Doo
31-10-2016
Still a bit surprised people seem to be condoning Phil's homophobia though just because they dislike Sharon.

I hope Ben finds out and lets Phil die a painful lonely death.
Tomski12
31-10-2016
Originally Posted by Whoopie Doo:
“So Roxy blew 3 million in six months? !!!

EastEnders has always been so unrealistic. No wonder its considered the joke soap.”

She bought a beauty salon, share in a club, car loads of expensive items and if I'm correct a flat. So actually it was realistic (especially for Roxy)
LHolmes
31-10-2016
Originally Posted by Whoopie Doo:
“So Roxy blew 3 million in six months? !!!

EastEnders has always been so unrealistic. No wonder its considered the joke soap.”

Danny and Glenda stole some of it. She bought a house and Roxy's (the salon) and new jeep so she did splash out a bit but there's no way she got through 3m. I remember Bryan Kirkwood referencing it on This Morning as, "Maths isn't our strong point." That's an understatement.

Also after apparently having nothing left (in terms of cash) at the end of 2010, Roxy sold her house, the salon and her stake in R&R in 2011 yet was penniless again a few months later.
LHolmes
31-10-2016
Originally Posted by Tomski12:
“She bought a beauty salon, share in a club, car loads of expensive items and if I'm correct a flat. So actually it was realistic (especially for Roxy)”

She was pretty reckless like giving the Vic to Peggy and the Arches to Phil (IIRC) but even then she still had other assets eg. the salon, her house, and a stake in the club. So even cash poor at the end of 2010 she was not exactly on the breadline. The odd thing is when she sold her remaining assets off in 2011 that money just evaporated into thin air (unless she had loads of debt but I can't even believe she got through the initial 3m even with some unwise choices and Danny conning her let alone went even further to have loads of debt on top of that).
T.K. Mazin
31-10-2016
Originally Posted by J-B:
“So she isn't a gold digger, apart from the writing, the multiple examples of gold digging since her return, and her characterisation ”

J-B is on a roll tonight .
Whoopie Doo
31-10-2016
Originally Posted by LHolmes:
“Danny and Glenda stole some of it. She bought a house and Roxy's (the salon) and new jeep so she did splash out a bit but there's no way she got through 3m. I remember Bryan Kirkwood referencing it on This Morning as, "Maths isn't our strong point." That's an understatement.

Also after apparently having nothing left (in terms of cash) at the end of 2010, Roxy sold her house, the salon and her stake in R&R in 2011 yet was penniless again a few months later.”

Oh so it happened under his reign! lol now it makes sense
Peg ODwyer
31-10-2016
Originally Posted by Whoopie Doo:
“Still a bit surprised people seem to be condoning Phil's homophobia though just because they dislike Sharon.

I hope Ben finds out and lets Phil die a painful lonely death.”

Poor Ben, he does not deserve this treatment by his nasty Dad. I can see & understand Sharons point, anyone who is married, expects their spouse to leave them something, if they do not already have joint accounts/ownership.
vald
31-10-2016
Originally Posted by Whoopie Doo:
“Still a bit surprised people seem to be condoning Phil's homophobia though just because they dislike Sharon.

I hope Ben finds out and lets Phil die a painful lonely death.”

I don't see anyone condoning it....it was disgusting. Ben should have been his first consideration.
<<
<
3 of 16
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map