Originally Posted by saralund:
“I didn't get the impression that Maeamo was about ecology. The fact that the ingredients came from within visual range of the restaurant wasn't about reducing carbon footprint, it was about immersing yourself in the world immediately around you and experiencing it vibrantly. I guess if people wait for months for a table, fly thousands of miles and pay a fortune, they're well and truly focused on what they're eating.
If I make the trip to a foreign city to see an exhibition of rare Vermeers, I don't mind that there aren't very many of them nor that I've had to pay a fortune. I think these 3-star establishments are essentially Vermeer exhibitions.
A friend of mine took his family for the tasting menu at the Fat Duck, and can still describe each course in minute detail, six years later. He didn't love every dish, but each one was an experience he won't forget.”
If you read interviews with him, you'll see his philosophy is rooted in an ethos based on tradition, ecology & the environment as well as cutting edge culinary principles.
I prefer to spend £££ less often on an amazing meal than £ on a few mediocre ones. There's a good reason why he has 3 stars and people will wait months for a table. I see no difference, personally, in the cultural value of experiencing a meal at somewhere like Maemo vs an example of high culture.
His dishes interest me as I also do a lot of preserving, I was "foraging" before the term was invented so unlike a lot of the comments I read on here, I'd actually like to try Esben's food.
but re my earlier point, here's still satire to be had though, at the grand contradiction.
PS
jonbwfc - I'f travel quite way to visit Rivington pigeon Tower again