Originally Posted by anthony david:
“Nothing needs looking at, they weren't good enough. The other four were very good indeed and it would have been wrong to eliminate one of them at that stage.”
I wasn't suggesting eliminating any of those that got through but both of those who went home showed themselves to be significantly better than the third chef to qualify from the previous night. I'm questioning taking three through then when the third best chef of the group was far worse than the top two and still pretty weak.
Originally Posted by David_Flett1:
“I can't ever remember 4 being sent home in this round before, yes I think four, actually 5 could have gone home and that would have been fair. Don't expect the that 3 to survive against last night's four though.”
Actually, you're probably right. I think I'm thinking of the amateur series where they've taken fewer through. Still think they should only have had two qualify from Tuesday's heat though.
”
