Johnny is such a poor character now
Ben/Johnny
2 of 2
Originally Posted by Adrian_Ward1:
“Johnny is so wooden”
“Johnny is so wooden”
Originally Posted by Adrian_Ward1:
“Johnny is such a poor character now”
“Johnny is such a poor character now”
Was it necessary to post both of these things? I think the first one got your point across adequately.
Originally Posted by Peg ODwyer:
“I don;t see any chemistry between them, so I'd rather they did not pair them up. Just because 2 guys are gay, doesn't mean they have to become boyfriends. I wish Paul had not left, I loved the way he softened Ben. Plus I loved the older Cokers too.”
“I don;t see any chemistry between them, so I'd rather they did not pair them up. Just because 2 guys are gay, doesn't mean they have to become boyfriends. I wish Paul had not left, I loved the way he softened Ben. Plus I loved the older Cokers too.”
Surely you could argue that they only paired off Paul and Ben because they were both gay? At least Ben and Johnny are two characters who were created in a more 'organic' way and unlike Paul weren't created simply to facilitate a storyline. I do take your point about not just putting them together because they're gay but I was never hugely convinced by Ben and Paul as a pairing (though with that said I thought Ben's relationship with Pam was brilliant.)
I agree with those on the thread saying that Ben should really be with Jay, the only character I see him having genuine chemistry with, but I don't think they'd go in that direction with Jay.
No, they don't have chemistry imo. Ben/Jay have great chemistry and I love their scenes but I wouldn't want it to turn romantic, I love their friendship/brother relationship and a romance would ruin that imo.
I may be a bit biased, I like Ben and I'm not a fan of Johnny so a relationship between these two doesn't appeal to me.
I may be a bit biased, I like Ben and I'm not a fan of Johnny so a relationship between these two doesn't appeal to me.
2 of 2
