|
||||||||
Is EastEnders in the predicament Corrie has been in for many years? |
![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 137
|
Is EastEnders in the predicament Corrie has been in for many years?
... i.e. competing demographics demanding different things from the show. Older viewers preferring more conventional, character driven storytelling, and younger viewers demanding more sensationalist, immediate gratification style storylines?
It's something I've thought for a while. The soap genre was certainly never invented to be dramatised in the way it has been in recent years. Why invent a programme that runs every week all year round if you're going to make them as action packed as a film or drama series chronicling one event over many months or years. Surely multiple killers per family in a soap was never sustainable? The point of a soap is surely to show every day interaction with drama gradually building from the characters? Imo, soaps have dug their own hole with increased sensationalism in recent years. Has EE reached a point where there is sufficient polarisation amongst its viewers where the show will struggle to please either, which, arguably, has been the case for Corrie for many years? |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 2,854
|
Quote:
... i.e. competing demographics demanding different things from the show. Older viewers preferring more conventional, character driven storytelling, and younger viewers demanding more sensationalist, immediate gratification style storylines?
It's something I've thought for a while. The soap genre was certainly never invented to be dramatised in the way it has been in recent years. Why invent a programme that runs every week all year round if you're going to make them as action packed as a film or drama series chronicling one event over many months or years. Surely multiple killers per family in a soap was never sustainable? The point of a soap is surely to show every day interaction with drama gradually building from the characters? Imo, soaps have dug their own hole with increased sensationalism in recent years. Has EE reached a point where there is sufficient polarisation amongst its viewers where the show will struggle to please either, which, arguably, has been the case for Corrie for many years? |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 137
|
Quote:
All I know is that Corrie has been rubbish for years, and now Eastenders is also rubbish, so yeah they're in the same predicament.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,462
|
I don't think Eastenders is in any predicament, it's been fantastic recently
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 137
|
Quote:
I don't think Eastenders is in any predicament, it's been fantastic recently
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,462
|
Quote:
And you've been registered since 05. My guess is you're a bit older than the average twitter teen?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 137
|
Quote:
Well im 28, but it doesn't mean I don't enjoy some sensationalism, but the difference in quality in Eastenders since SOC took over has been remarkable
(P.s. I lost interest in soaps years ago and don't really have an iron in the fire regards the debate, though corrie was always my preferred soap. But I do still have a residual academic interest and watch them all from time to time. ) |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,462
|
Quote:
I agree. SOC's approach is the only one that makes sense. But I remember when positive twitter comments were universally used on here as a way of buttressing posts praising EE's quality. As was trending.
(P.s. I lost interest in soaps years ago and don't really have an iron in the fire regards the debate, though corrie was always my preferred soap. But I do still have a residual academic interest and watch them all from time to time. ) |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 137
|
Quote:
Viewing figures haven't gone down for Eastenders so the viewer base is still there
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,462
|
Quote:
Do you think there has been an increased divide in the fanbase?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 137
|
Quote:
I do think there is a certain section of the fan base pissed that SOC axed a lot of characters, and I think that will come out even more on Twitter when Ronnie and Roxy leave, but I think long term SOC will be a very good appointment for Eastenders
I suppose another way of looking at it is that EE is over 30 years old now. The same age Corrie was in the early to mid nineties. It seems to me that EE is going through an inversion of the transition phase Corrie was going through then. I.e. a more back to basics approach for EE now as opposed to a more modern sensationalist approach Corrie was attempting then in response to the more edgy EE and Brookside. Is EE now leading the pack in a new, more sustainable phase of the soap genre? Corrie certainly didn't have an easy transition, and didn't really his its stride until the early naughties. It seems as a TV show gets older, the harder it is to balance the views and interests of all viewers. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,462
|
Quote:
I agree 100%.
I suppose another way of looking at it is that EE is over 30 years old now. The same age Corrie was in the early to mid nineties. It seems to me that EE is going through an inversion of the transition phase Corrie was going through then. I.e. a more back to basics approach for EE now as opposed to a more modern sensationalist approach Corrie was attempting then in response to the more edgy EE and Brookside. Is EE now leading the pack in a new, more sustainable phase of the soap genre? Corrie certainly didn't have an easy transition, and didn't really his its stride until the early naughties. It seems as a TV show gets older, the harder it is to balance the views and interests of all viewers. Completely agree, doesn't help that the social media audience were spoiled under DTC who hyped everything up on Twitter and Facebook, and basically used that to platform to base how he ran the show, in fact I was surprised he killed Lucy off and that Twitter didn't explode |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 1,351
|
I've been a visitor to this forum for many years now and EastEnders, more than any other soap is scrutinised a lot more. If it's dramatic and big oh it's too OTT, if it's everyday character stories, oh it's boring! look at Emmerdale, 12 car pile up, why can't EastEnders do that? So it will never win.
Personally, Coronation Street is still recovering from a horrendous couple of years and even now, is still not out of the woods. The storylines have a bit more of an edge to them is all. EastEnders's Friday episode with Lee and Whitney's wedding was heartbreaking and poignant. It didn't need a big revelation, screaming row, punch up etc, instead it focused very much on Lee and his alarmingly dwindling mental health. The end of the episode in particular was quite harrowing. I really enjoyed it and I'm interested to see more of this story. Sean O'Connor and the team have gradually brought Lee's mental health story back to the forefront, instead of devoting weeks to it and then dropping it. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 8,756
|
Quote:
Completely agree, doesn't help that the social media audience were spoiled under DTC who hyped everything up on Twitter and Facebook, and basically used that to platform to base how he ran the show, in fact I was surprised he killed Lucy off and that Twitter didn't explode
My position is this - I liked many of DTC's ideas but the standard of writing, and some of the cast leaving/getting pregnant etc, scuppered many decent storylines, the who killed Lucy in particular when Jac Jossa got pregnant, Ben Hardy and Mimi Keene left and I think this forced re-writes of some of the original idea and DTC then allowed silliness to reign. SOC has indeed done the programme a great service in revising the writing and making sure characters are concentrated on rather than sensationalism, however, the axings were hasty and in some cases foolish easy targets. If you tidy up the writing so viewers get interested in the characters again, only for them to being written out it seems rather pointless. The Cokers and Lee Carter are prime examples of characters who had plenty more mileage in them but weren't given a chance to work with the improved material before the decision to axe was made. I am yet to be convinced he has a clear vision of what is required, but will give him more than a month or two before I start demanding his head on a spike. I am one of those who is a long term viewer (I've watched from the beginning) but I am not quite ready to join the blue rinse brigade yet. Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 2,854
|
Quote:
When do you think Corrie became rubbish?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 36,061
|
Quote:
When Stuart Blackburn took over, it just hasn't been the same. I cant see Kate Oates making it any better either. They need new characters.
I think it's writers that's the biggest problem with Corrie, also keeping hold off their many long term in training b list characters like Fizz, Sean etc |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 22,461
|
Quote:
Viewing figures haven't gone down for Eastenders so the viewer base is still there
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 19,604
|
The last month of Eastenders has been far better than anything we have i had in the previous 12 months.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,462
|
Quote:
People just put in on out of habit and it's in the background. Not the same as watching it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 36,061
|
I would say if anything, out of the big three EastEnders has the most fickle audience. It has more teens watching and tweeting about it than the other two and they are more likely to switch off rather than just have on in the background.
At least that is what it has been accused of in the past, having kiddies and tweens on FB and twitter dictate what happens on the show. |
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 9,021
|
Quote:
People just put in on out of habit and it's in the background. Not the same as watching it.
To answer the OP, I think all soaps have viewers who watch for different things. I don't think EastEnders is done with drama/big storylines and that eventually there will be a mix. I think SOC is just tying up loose ends and making us care about characters before starting his own storylines. I don't imagine he'll go to the lengths DTC did at times in his storytelling but fortunately you don't need to to have exciting storylines. Some of the storylines where DTC took things to extremes still ended up being boring. As for Corrie I think the big issue there is that they struggle to pull anything off these days without making viewers cringe. The high drama and everyday scenes are generally both poorly executed. However, I'm an on/off viewer and haven't watched it much recently. Some think it's improving, others disagree. |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Nucleus
Posts: 1,770
|
As a younger viewer of Corrie I much prefer the authentic character driven storytelling. Problem is in Corrie - too many of the scenes that aren't supposed to be dramatic are played totally for laughs. Unfortunately Corrie have forgotten how to do this naturally and it all comes across as forced and over the top.
When I watch EastEnders I often find it quite boring BUT it seems more natural that Corrie at the minute. |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,465
|
Quote:
As a younger viewer of Corrie I much prefer the authentic character driven storytelling. Problem is in Corrie - too many of the scenes that aren't supposed to be dramatic are played totally for laughs. Unfortunately Corrie have forgotten how to do this naturally and it all comes across as forced and over the top.
When I watch EastEnders I often find it quite boring BUT it seems more natural that Corrie at the minute. EE in recent months has managed to concentrate on making the characters realistic people again. They're interacting, chatting and exchanging banter in a natural way. They've turned characters that we didn't particularly like or care about into people who are becoming normal, everyday people we can relate to. All down to attention to detail and clever writing. Quite remarkable really. Okay, it's meant that sensationalism has gone and plots have been simmering rather than exploding. Yes, people have accused it of becoming boring but it's more than likely a temporary phase that'll enable us to care about the forthcoming stories more now that the characters have regained some sense of personality and realism. DTC got carried away in the second half of his tenure and it was going to kill the show if it continued. Too much was happening too quickly and it wasn't credible or realistic. In fact, much of it wasn't even memorable, it was a blur. It was a shame as his first year was superb, unfortunately he seemed to get swept up on the initial praise and went OTT with his retconning and fan-fiction. People accuse of SOC coming in and wielding the axe, getting rid of the wrong characters. Given how he's transformed Pam, Les and Lee, you have to kind of wonder if it's right to lose them but he must have a long-term vision where the departing characters aren't needed. He could have made some easy decisions to axe the likes of Ian, Jane and Phil as they're going to be hard to redeem but he hasn't and you have to give him credit for that, it'll be interesting to see where he takes these characters as they need a lot of work and have some serious problems to deal with. Conversely, KO hasn't even found the axe under her desk. She needs to... fast. The characters need sorting out as much as the writing, she needs to take a leaf out of SOC's book and shake up the cast considerably, it needs new blood. Too many characters are just festering and few, if any, of those introduced in the last two or three years are working. |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: London
Posts: 9,412
|
I think EastEnders is in a transition phase, and Christmas/New Year will be the start of SOC's storylines. As LHolmes said it does feel like he's setting the show up for a new era by tying up some loose ends and improving/developing characters. Given the recent axings I expect we will see lots of new characters in 2017.
I'm enjoying it at the moment even if it isn't exactly action-packed. It reminds me of what EastEnders was like 20+ years ago. However, I do understand why this must be frustrating for newer viewers who are used to the twists and OMG moments of the Santer/Kirkwood/DTC eras. SOC has a more measured approach to drama but it's silly to suggest he can't or won't provide big storylines; he was story producer during what was arguably EastEnders' most successful period ever - the early 2000s - and he was responsible for the Trevor and Mo story. |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 592
|
Good point made above about SOC probably getting criticism from 'twitter' because he axed a few 'popular' characters - rather than his stories or direction.
If he had kept on Ronnie, Roxy and Masood, would he be getting as much grief? |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 12:36.


