|
||||||||
Week Six: Who Should Have Been Fired? |
| View Poll Results: Who should have been fired? | |||
| Rebecca |
|
49 | 59.04% |
| Sofiane |
|
39 | 46.99% |
| Trishna |
|
2 | 2.41% |
| Somebody else on the losing team (please specify) |
|
4 | 4.82% |
| Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 83. You can't vote on this poll right now - are you signed in? | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Wales
Posts: 1,197
|
Week Six: Who Should Have Been Fired?
Poll up soon
|
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 364
|
I had such a soft spot for Rebecca and I don't think she deserved to go tonight!
I voted Sof
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 1,369
|
Rebecca for me, that was a colossal mistake, the alarm bells were ringing the minute the Turkish guy said on the phone they had all kinds of 'soap', the others picked up on it and she should have checked.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 3,056
|
Rebecca
Nice person but came across as a wimp and the way the footage was edited ehrn PM was determined she seemed to be hiding, as did Frances.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Kingston Upon Thames
Posts: 1,863
|
Rebecca, whilst a very nice girl, was totally useless throughout the process thusfar and so she was the right choice to go (though imo I think she should have been fired last week in place of JD)
Sofiane however has repeatedly shown himself to be an AWFUL team player, one of the worst the show has ever had. Totally in his own world. Should have been a double firing. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: The Rebel County
Posts: 17,761
|
Rebecca was doomed from the second she didn't fight to be PM.
She should've grabbed it and made Trish subteam leader, then she could hide behind overseeing everything, having the others negotiate, and banging on about time and logistics. In saying that, it's hard to see the winner in anyone on that team, so Suges should've fired them all.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2016
Posts: 189
|
Rebecca is a cert, because she is useless. I expect her "marketing agency" is just a crutch for other local businesses. Sof came very close and i would expect him to go on the next loss.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Dream
Posts: 2,797
|
Rebecca. She was dead meat for a good while and this task fully showed it. Nice girl but horrible candidate.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 5,853
|
Rebecca
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 900
|
Paul should have gone for green-lighting the trip to Streatham.
1) he had doubts that the shopkeeper had understood correctly but did not press Rebecca to check, perhaps figuring correctly that she'd be blamed anyway 2) as a Londoner, he knew it would take an hour or so because it is south of the river whereas his subteam was supposed to be east Of those in the final boardroom, Rebecca's time was clearly up. Trishna did herself no favours -- as Claude said, she identified the right tactic of walking away from failed negotiations but did not go through with it, giving the impression she lacks leadership skills. (As an aside, Trishna may have been right here.) Sofiane is impossible to work with. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 10,713
|
Quote:
Rebecca, whilst a very nice girl, was totally useless throughout the process thusfar and so she was the right choice to go (though imo I think she should have been fired last week in place of JD)
Sofiane however has repeatedly shown himself to be an AWFUL team player, one of the worst the show has ever had. Totally in his own world. Should have been a double firing. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,595
|
Would AS have accepted Rebecca business plan if she was running it with her sister?
Wouldn't her sister have had to bail out? |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Lytham St Annes
Posts: 2,366
|
Quote:
Would AS have accepted Rebecca business plan if she was running it with her sister?
Wouldn't her sister have had to bail out? |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 900
|
Quote:
Would AS have accepted Rebecca business plan if she was running it with her sister?
Wouldn't her sister have had to bail out? Here is Claude explaining this in pretty frank terms to Jordan: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NbpW7CY9Cnc |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2016
Posts: 85
|
Rebecca's firing was long overdue.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: In my Opinion
Posts: 10,057
|
Rebecca - really not sure how she made it onto the programme. Ineffectual and delusional. Honestly, she's worse than an empty seat...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 2,546
|
Quote:
Rebecca was doomed from the second she didn't fight to be PM.
She should've grabbed it and made Trish subteam leader, then she could hide behind overseeing everything, having the others negotiate, and banging on about time and logistics. In saying that, it's hard to see the winner in anyone on that team, so Suges should've fired them all. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 5,212
|
Rebecca was the right choice to go.
Although both she and Frances have been in the losing team every time, Frances is more under the radar so has escaped so far. |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 2,546
|
Quote:
Rebecca - really not sure how she made it onto the programme. Ineffectual and delusional. Honestly, she's worse than an empty seat...
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 00:36.

