Originally Posted by Mark_Washingto1:
“Yeah I think the story could ruin Peter, but I still wouldn't put it past Kate Oates.
Yeah but controversy sells these days”
Short term yes,but that would have to be weighed against the long ter harm in sacrificing such an important character.
Viewers that tune in because they've seen a tabloid screaming about a controversial plot tend not to stick around once that short term plot has played out so any gain is temporary. Meanwhile, loyal viewers going back decades become disillusioned and switch off so thetevis a danger of rstings actually going down.
You have to remember that whilst Corrie of course want to attract new viewers, it has the oldest demographic of all the soaps due to its age and reputation as the.most sedate and down to earth amongst them. Any producer with a half a brain doesn't risk losing that core audience.
It's not Hollyoaks (& I do by the way like Hollyoaks) where they assume a young audience who want constant excitement and melodrama and probably won't stay with the soap once their favourite characters have left and they themselves age. It expects a high turnover of characters and viewers in a way the other soaps don't.
Brookside is an example of a soap which started courting controversy and cheap stunts to attract interest and it burnt out, losing it's core audience and was cancelled. No EP wants to repeat that mistake.