I find the whole "so and so will obviously win" annoyance a bit odd, to be honest. I know a tight competition is exciting, but everyone complains if this is manufactured by the producers and judges. If one contestant is clearly more popular with the public than anyone else, and good enough to survive a dance off if that happens, then yes, they probably will win - I don't see why this is a problem. It's better this than endless manipulation and pretence, surely? As it happens, I think Danny has a very good chance but am not totally sure he'll win - there's still enough time for others to consolidate their popularity, I think. I still prefer others and imagine there are plenty out there like me. But if he's a good enough dancer to get to the final and the most popular with the public, then he should win, surely?